BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
shart1780 said:
OK, I'll rephrase that. I believe in God more than man's view of God's creation.
So you don't believe in Genesis?
shart1780 said:
OK, I'll rephrase that. I believe in God more than man's view of God's creation.
shart1780 said:OK, I'll rephrase that. I believe in God more than man's view of God's creation.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
So you don't believe in Genesis?
shart1780 said:
OK, I'll rephrase that. I believe in God more than man's view of God's creation.
I won't discount that God may have caused some sort of Big bang, but I believe in a 7 day creation.
Evidence for this? I can claim that this post is written on behalf of Xenu alien overlord and his ET will acting through me and it's just as valid.shart1780 said:
Genesis was written by God through man. Man was his secretary, so to speak.
See theres a little bit of a problem since all the heavy elements in your system were created in supernova blasts and following the big bang there was only hydrogen and a little bit of helium, there had to have been at least one generation of stars before the Earth could possibly form, the universe simply lacked the elements required to make a planet, or for that matter you. First generation stars means at least a few hundred million years, the fact we can see back in time more than that when we look at the stars would support this.I won't discount that God may have caused some sort of Big bang, but I believe in a 7 day creation.
A_Wanderer said:Evidence for this? I can claim that this post is written on behalf of Xenu alien overlord and his ET will acting through me and it's just as valid.
shart1780 said:
Genesis was written by God through man. Man was his secretary, so to speak.
melon said:
It's quite odd, considering that science is a creation of God and probably the most direct evidence of His nature.
Melon
AEON said:Wow Melon! For the first time I think we are in absolute 100 % agreement!
angelordevil said:
It's really interesting to note that many scientists actually frowned on the Big Bang theory for years. Why? Because such a theory hinted at creation, with all its religious connotations.
AEON said:
It's Amazing how quickly some scientist will abandon science once they reveal evidence that there is a God.
A_Wanderer said:Evidence for this? I can claim that this post is written on behalf of Xenu alien overlord and his ET will acting through me and it's just as valid.
If this wonderfully accurate evidence exists then present it and I would look like a contemptable fool for willfully ignoring it, but that simply has not been done.Wanderer, even if the evidence were right in front of you I don't think you would chose to accept it.
A_Wanderer said:If this wonderfully accurate evidence exists then present it and I would look like a contemptable fool for willfully ignoring it, but that simply has not been done.
I generally fall in line with theistic evolutionists – but even that is still evoking a designer, a divine causal agent.A_Wanderer said:As a matter of record I do distinguish between theistic evolution and creationism / ID and you clearly are not a nutbar, but for the sake of argument I am more than willing to take the hardest line on the absence of the divine in the universe.
shart1780 said:There really is no point at all trying to prove to anyone that God exists through concrete evidence. Even if it could be done (which it can't), it wouldn't turn anyone to Christ, which is ultimately what matters.
AEON said:
I sort of disagree. It was the evidence of the Big Bang in conjunction with majoring in philosophy in college for 3 years that opened my mind to receiving Christ.
Yes, ultimately I had to take a leap of faith. But for me, it felt more like a baby step because it made so much sense to me.