Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-10-2008, 11:10 PM   #1
Refugee
 
Infinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,188
Local Time: 04:25 PM
Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

By Warren P. Strobel, McClatchy Newspapers
Mon Mar 10, 7:08 PM ET



WASHINGTON — An exhaustive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were captured after the 2003 U.S. invasion has found no evidence that Saddam Hussein's regime had any operational links with Osama bin Laden's al Qaida terrorist network.

The Pentagon-sponsored study, scheduled for release later this week, did confirm that Saddam's regime provided some support to other terrorist groups, particularly in the Middle East , U.S. officials told McClatchy . However, his security services were directed primarily against Iraqi exiles, Shiite Muslims, Kurds and others he considered enemies of his regime.

The new study of the Iraqi regime's archives found no documents indicating a "direct operational link" between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaida before the invasion, according to a U.S. official familiar with the report.

He and others spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity because the study isn't due to be shared with Congress and released before Wednesday.

President Bush and his aides used Saddam's alleged relationship with al Qaida, along with Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction, as arguments for invading Iraq after the September 11, 2001 , terrorist attacks.

Then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld claimed in September 2002 that the United States had "bulletproof" evidence of cooperation between the radical Islamist terror group and Saddam's secular dictatorship.

Then-Secretary of State Colin Powell cited multiple linkages between Saddam and al Qaida in a watershed February 2003 speech to the United Nations Security Council to build international support for the invasion. Almost every one of the examples Powell cited turned out to be based on bogus or misinterpreted intelligence.

As recently as last July, Bush tried to tie al Qaida to the ongoing violence in Iraq . "The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims," he said.

The new study, entitled "Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents", was essentially completed last year and has been undergoing what one U.S. intelligence official described as a "painful" declassification review.

It was produced by a federally-funded think tank, the Institute for Defense Analyses , under contract to the Norfolk, Va .-based U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Spokesmen for the Joint Forces Command declined to comment until the report is released. One of the report's authors, Kevin Woods , also declined to comment.

The issue of al Qaida in Iraq already has played a role in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Sen. John McCain , the presumptive GOP nominee, mocked Sen. Barack Obama , D-Ill, recently for saying that he'd keep some U.S. troops in Iraq if al Qaida established a base there.

"I have some news. Al Qaida is in Iraq ," McCain told supporters. Obama retorted that, "There was no such thing as al Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade." (In fact, al Qaida in Iraq didn't emerge until 2004, a year after the invasion.)

The new study appears destined to be used by both critics and supporters of Bush's decision to invade Iraq to advance their own familiar arguments.

While the documents reveal no Saddam-al Qaida links, they do show that Saddam and his underlings were willing to use terrorism against enemies of the regime and had ties to regional and global terrorist groups, the officials said.

However, the U.S. intelligence official, who's read the full report, played down the prospect of any major new revelations, saying, "I don't think there's any surprises there."

Saddam, whose regime was relentlessly secular, was wary of Islamic extremist groups such as al Qaida, although like many other Arab leaders, he gave some financial support to Palestinian groups that sponsored terrorism against Israel .

According to the State Department's annual report on global terrorism for 2002— the last before the Iraq invasion— Saddam supported the militant Islamic group Hamas in Gaza , Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command , a radical, Syrian-based terrorist group.

Saddam also hosted Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal , although the Abu Nidal Organization was more active when he lived in Libya and he was murdered in Baghdad in August 2002 , possibly on Saddam's orders.

An earlier study based on the captured Iraqi documents, released by the Joint Forces Command in March 2006 , found that a militia Saddam formed after the 1991 Persian Gulf war, the Fedayeen Saddam, planned assassinations and bombings against his enemies. Those included Iraqi exiles and opponents in Iraq's Kurdish and Shiite communities.

Other documents indicate that the Fedayeen Saddam opened paramilitary training camps that, starting in 1998, hosted "Arab volunteers" from outside of Iraq . What happened to the non-Iraqi volunteers is unknown, however, according to the earlier study.

The new Pentagon study isn't the first to refute earlier administration contentions about Saddam and al Qaida.

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

ON THE WEB:

Earlier report from the Iraqi Perspectives Project:

http://www.jfcom.mil/newslink/storyarchive/2006/ipp.pdf




Wait, so could Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice have been wrong??????
__________________

__________________
Infinity is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:31 AM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 03:25 PM
I still believe there is a Obama / Hussein connection.
I think they at least met.



Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. is his father
__________________

__________________
deep is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:42 AM   #3
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,685
Local Time: 05:25 PM
I have a resolution and satellite footage to prove it...
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 03-11-2008, 12:55 AM   #4
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by deep
I still believe there is a Obama / Hussein connection.
I think they at least met.



Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. is his father


__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:07 AM   #5
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,237
Local Time: 05:25 PM


Awesome picture.

deep, you're trying waaaaay too hard now.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 04:40 AM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 03:25 PM
no effort
at all

Irvine had emailed me that
he had a great picture

for the easily amused




I do like your shots of half dome
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:16 PM   #7
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
BrownEyedBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Pedro Sula, Honduras
Posts: 3,510
Local Time: 05:25 PM
No shit.
__________________
BrownEyedBoy is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:43 PM   #8
Blue Crack Addict
 
unico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rage Ave.
Posts: 18,747
Local Time: 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511




__________________
unico is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 04:04 PM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
U2isthebest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vision over visibility....
Posts: 12,332
Local Time: 07:25 PM
"Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida"


Hey, remember when we knew that...back in early 2003?
__________________
U2isthebest is offline  
Old 03-11-2008, 07:53 PM   #10
Refugee
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 2,451
Local Time: 05:25 PM
Even if there "was no connection" there was for the simple fact that they both were funding likeminded terrorist groups. I think people got so into the small details of the "no connection" argument simply because there wasn't anything formal (i.e. personal meetings, records etc.). Most people knew there was no connection as stated above but that didn't let Saddam off the hook for funding bombings in Isreal etc. Let me also state that I was NOT for the war (even at the very beginning) - if the United States was really going after the worst "terrorists" they would have invaded Saudi Arabia and tried to force those assholes to become a "democracy" instead of playing buddy-buddy with them like the Bush's (as well as other Presidents) have done all these years.
__________________
Harry Vest is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 01:17 AM   #11
Refugee
 
Infinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,188
Local Time: 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Harry Vest
Even if there "was no connection" there was for the simple fact that they both were funding likeminded terrorist groups. I think people got so into the small details of the "no connection" argument simply because there wasn't anything formal (i.e. personal meetings, records etc.). Most people knew there was no connection as stated above but that didn't let Saddam off the hook for funding bombings in Isreal etc. Let me also state that I was NOT for the war (even at the very beginning) - if the United States was really going after the worst "terrorists" they would have invaded Saudi Arabia and tried to force those assholes to become a "democracy" instead of playing buddy-buddy with them like the Bush's (as well as other Presidents) have done all these years.
I'm glad you are against the war. I'm glad you were against it from the very beginning like me because in the very beginning most people were for it. But the "no connection" thing is a big deal since the whole administration not only said that there was a connection but used it as a major reason for the war. On top of that, they even implied that Saddam had a role in 9/11. Most Americans thought he was part of the attacks. When you have people like Donald Rumsfeld saying that the U.S. has BULLETPROOF evidence that there is a link and then now we find out that was a complete 100% LIE, it gets irritating. Even worse, the second major reason why we invaded Iraq: WMD's, is also a complete LIE. That is when the details start mattering. If the simple fact was that Saddam also had funded certain terrorist groups then they should have said that instead of claiming that they have evidence of an al-Qaeda-Saddam connection and leading 3/4 of the nation and most of Congress to believe them.
__________________
Infinity is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 05:07 PM   #12
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,493
Local Time: 06:25 PM
wow! it's like the Soviet Union!

[q] Pentagon Report on Saddam's Iraq Censored?
March 12, 2008 1:58 PM

ABC News' Jonathan Karl Reports: The Bush Administration apparently does not want a U.S. military study that found no direct connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda to get any attention. This morning, the Pentagon cancelled plans to send out a press release announcing the report's release and will no longer make the report available online.

The report was to be posted on the Joint Forces Command website this afternoon, followed by a background briefing with the authors. No more. The report will be made available only to those who ask for it, and it will be sent via U.S. mail from Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia.

It won't be emailed to reporters and it won't be posted online.

Asked why the report would not be posted online and could not be emailed, the spokesman for Joint Forces Command said: "We're making the report available to anyone who wishes to have it, and we'll send it out via CD in the mail."

Another Pentagon official said initial press reports on the study made it "too politically sensitive."[/q]
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 05:36 PM   #13
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,685
Local Time: 05:25 PM
Quote:
Asked why the report would not be posted online and could not be emailed, the spokesman for Joint Forces Command said: "We're making the report available to anyone who wishes to have it, and we'll send it out via CD in the mail."
WTF, how does this make any sense?

You people are idiots...










plus, so not cost effective.
__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 03-12-2008, 05:41 PM   #14
Refugee
 
Infinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,188
Local Time: 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


plus, so not cost effective.
Don't worry, the only cost will be the ink and paper used to print the money.

BUSH = SADDAM
__________________
Infinity is offline  
Old 03-12-2008, 05:42 PM   #15
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 30,343
Local Time: 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Infinitum98
BUSH = SADDAM
__________________

__________________
phillyfan26 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com