the iron horse
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Yes?
No?
Why?
No?
Why?
Evolution is a scientific fact and it is also a scientific theory.the iron horse said:"Teach ID in a theology classroom and evolutionary biology in the science classroom."
Are you saying science can prove evolution without a doubt?
A done, sealed, in the science fact?
The eye of an eagle watches for something called faith.
the iron horse said:"Evolution is a scientific fact.."
Please post the facts on the origin of matter and life.
My view is that whatever we believe on this topic is a matter of faith.
I believe God created all, but I have zero science, just faith.
...and a few reasons that make me think this way
BonoVoxSupastar said:Teach science in a science class and theology in a theology class.
It's pretty simple.
This is not a question about the origin of life (a field in which much study is being done), it is a question of evolution. We have mountains of evidence for evolution from both our knowlege of paleontology right through to genetics. New species arise as conditions change, complex mechanisms on all levels driving natural selection, information being passed down through genes ~ altered through mutation and sexual reproduction.the iron horse said:"Evolution is a scientific fact.."
Please post the facts on the origin of matter and life.
My view is that whatever we believe on this topic is a matter of faith.
I believe God created all, but I have zero science, just faith.
...and a few reasons that make me think this way
the iron horse said:Are you saying science can prove evolution without a doubt?
A done, sealed, in the science fact?
The eye of an eagle watches for something called faith.
melon said:Creationism and ID have no scientific basis.
nbcrusader said:Only to the extent that (i) science will not consider the concept of God and/or (ii) such concepts are beyond our ability to understand through scientific theory.
u2bonogirl said:I dont understand why if macroevolution can be taught as fact in school when its not proven, then the alternative side cant be taught as well.
Shouldnt kids be given a choice?
Why are people so afraid to allow this?
As somebody who believes in microevolution but also creationism, should I have been forced to attend classes that taught something that went directly against what I believe in?
melon said:
Shintoism holds that the Earth was created with a gigantic penis.
melon said:
Shintoism holds that the Earth was created with a gigantic penis. Shall we consider that an "alternative theory" for evolution?
No. Creationism and ID aren't even in the realm of "theory," which is a strict scientific definition. Creationism and ID go into the realm of "guessing" with no proof. It has no place in science class. Period.
Yes. There is value in understanding mainstream academic knowledge. I took a class in microeconomics that was nothing more than a propaganda class for supply-side economics. Should I have been forced to attend a class that taught something that went directly against what I believe in? Yes. Now I am very well-informed about where supply-side ideology comes from, and I'm able to formulate intelligent criticisms of it.
Melon
u2bonogirl said:I think what I gained from attending that class was a stronger belief in what I had believed in to begin with
I also got publicly taunted by my teacher for not believing in what most of the rest of the class believed in. There were a few others but they were too ashamed to speak up
melon said:
Well, it is science class. As long as you don't intend to have a career in biology, then it really doesn't matter if you disagree with evolution, ultimately. But now you know what science believes when it comes to the creation of life, and there is some value in that.
I still greatly believe that it would be a huge mistake to taint science with religious tenets. It would be a disaster.
Melon
u2bonogirl said:I guess I see more reason in creationism than the big bang or darwinism, or anything like that.
Even if I didnt believe in God I think I would still find more reason in it.
Nobody in the history of the world has been able to come up with an empirical test for the existence of God, hence as an element God is unfalsifiable and therefore having God or any unfalsifiable being in the equation makes it unscientific.nbcrusader said:
Only to the extent that (i) science will not consider the concept of God and/or (ii) such concepts are beyond our ability to understand through scientific theory.
the iron horse said:It takes a lot of faith not to believe in a God.
It takes a lot of faith to believe in a God.