equality blooms with spring - Page 61 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-14-2009, 12:47 PM   #901
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,331
Local Time: 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Do you feel it is more honorable to have an opinion based on conscience or one based on politics?
Conscience, which is why I know that eventually gays and lesbians will be treated like full citizens. Your conscience tells you that it's ok that they're not.



Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
As of this moment, gay marriage is not a Constitution right.
Is straight marriage? Can my marriage be nullified by a majority vote in my state?


Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Many believe they already do have full Constitution rights...
And they're fooling themselves, with their conscience somehow clear.


The Fourteenth Amendment:
Quote:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Law-abiding and taxpaying gays and lesbians are denied the full rights and protections of the US Constitution. They don't get the same rights and protections I do as a straight married woman. That's ok with your honorable conscience? Is that what you're "holding the line" for? Is that what you'll be telling your gay or lesbian grandchild?
__________________

__________________
martha is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:10 PM   #902
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post

that's far milder than what the church is threatening to do.
The Catholic Church is not making a threat - they are saying that under this new law they will be prohibited from obtaing a certificate to receive this money because of their current, and long standing religious views on homosexuality.

The Catholic charity work will continue.
__________________

__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:20 PM   #903
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martha View Post

Law-abiding and taxpaying gays and lesbians are denied the full rights and protections of the US Constitution. They don't get the same rights and protections I do as a straight married woman. That's ok with your honorable conscience? Is that what you're "holding the line" for? Is that what you'll be telling your gay or lesbian grandchild?
Again, I simply agree with Obama and Clinton that gay marriage is not a marriage because a marriage is between a man and a woman. There can be no protection of something that does not even exist.

If you accept the definition that a marriage is a union between a man and a woman (as I do - along with these Democratic heroes), then that automatically excludes any other possible combination.
__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:42 PM   #904
Self-righteous bullshitter
 
BoMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan — Socialist paradise
Posts: 16,659
Local Time: 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Do you feel it is more honorable to have an opinion based on conscience or one based on politics?
My conscience, which is why I cannot justify denying rights that I enjoy to a entire group of people. I am no better than Irvine, and he is no better than I, so why do I have more rights than he does?
__________________

BoMac is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:45 PM   #905
Blue Crack Addict
 
daygloeyes2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: No Emily's Allowed
Posts: 26,459
Local Time: 08:00 PM
I vehemently disagree with Obama and Clinton's shared stance on gay marriage.
__________________
daygloeyes2 is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:50 PM   #906
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
I certainly agree.

I wonder what President Obama's grandchildren will think of him when they hear him say, "I believe a marriage is union between a man and a woman"

Will he be remembered as an old fashioned bigot? A backwards thinking conservative who is "fearful and intolerant"?
FDR and JFK are remembered for their rather cowardly records on civil rights, just as much as Truman and LBJ are remembered for their advances. So it is worth noting that people do take notice, and Obama's record on this front will be remembered for what it is, even if, like FDR and JFK (and Clinton, for that matter), he is remembered positively in other respects.
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:57 PM   #907
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
The Catholic Church is not making a threat - they are saying that under this new law they will be prohibited from obtaing a certificate to receive this money because of their current, and long standing religious views on homosexuality.
Have government officials charged with enforcing this law concurred with this opinion, or is this the Church having their usual histrionic hissy fit when they don't get their way? After all, they "punished" people for suing them over the sex scandals by closing lots of churches. That'll show 'em for challenging their authority.
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 01:59 PM   #908
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Many believe they already do have full Constitutional rights...
Then, by this logic, it appears that gay people have better constitutional rights in other countries, and that the U.S. is effectively backwards.
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 02:03 PM   #909
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvine511 View Post
if the church wishes to receive government money with which it then seeks to aid the poor, all the church has to do is to give all their employees the same benefits whether they are married to a person of the same gender or the opposite gender. that's it. is that really so awful? that they have to follow the rules?
The question this begs too is whether we would be okay with giving government money to religious organizations that would refuse to hire black people, according to their belief structures. Why are gay people an acceptable punching bag when it comes to government funding?
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 02:05 PM   #910
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,331
Local Time: 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
Again, I simply agree with Obama and Clinton that gay marriage is not a marriage because a marriage is between a man and a woman. There can be no protection of something that does not even exist.

If you accept the definition that a marriage is a union between a man and a woman (as I do - along with these Democratic heroes), then that automatically excludes any other possible combination.
You quoted me, then didn't even address the quote.
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 02:07 PM   #911
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,331
Local Time: 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anitram View Post
I would like to ask you to outline the negative effects that legalizing gay marriage has had in nations where it is legal today. How has Canadian, Dutch, Spanish etc. society suffered, tangibly or otherwise, from this legislative move?
Since AEON apparently has you on ignore, I'll take a stab at it.

I can only think of the reduced tax revenues from once-single people finally getting the married tax benefits.
__________________
martha is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 04:15 PM   #912
Resident Photo Buff
Forum Moderator
 
Diemen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere in middle America
Posts: 13,234
Local Time: 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by melon View Post
The question this begs too is whether we would be okay with giving government money to religious organizations that would refuse to hire black people, according to their belief structures. Why are gay people an acceptable punching bag when it comes to government funding?
Because black people are naturally born that way. Gay people are deviants leading a willingly sinful life, obviously.
__________________
Diemen is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 04:25 PM   #913
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martha View Post
Since AEON apparently has you on ignore....
Not at all - I just don't always have the time to answer every question. Sometimes the threads move pretty darn fast. I do my best with the time I have.

To answer the question - I don't think enough time has passed (a few years) to determine much of anything.
__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 04:30 PM   #914
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
AEON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 4,052
Local Time: 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by melon View Post
Have government officials charged with enforcing this law concurred with this opinion...
No, I don't think they have concurred. It seems their view is that Catholic Church is actively refusing to make the necessary changes to earn the certificate - and the Catholic Church believes the city is actively forcing them to change their stance on homosexuality by mandating the certificate.
__________________
AEON is offline  
Old 11-14-2009, 04:34 PM   #915
She's the One
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,331
Local Time: 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEON View Post
To answer the question - I don't think enough time has passed (a few years) to determine much of anything.
How much time needs to pass before you will be able to determine something?
__________________

__________________
martha is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com