Diana or Camilla - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-05-2005, 05:44 AM   #1
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
BonosSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,566
Local Time: 03:39 AM
Diana or Camilla

Assuming sometimes it is hard to have both, who makes a better marriage partner--someone hot or someone steadfast?
__________________

__________________
BonosSaint is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 07:54 AM   #2
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Camilla, because Diana is a rotted corpse.

Melon
__________________

__________________
melon is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 07:57 AM   #3
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,471
Local Time: 02:39 AM
funny, Camilla looks kind of rotted as well ...
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 07:58 AM   #4
Refugee
 
Evalicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Golganooza
Posts: 1,291
Local Time: 09:39 AM
neither
__________________
Evalicious is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 09:26 AM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
beau2ifulday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 5,512
Local Time: 07:39 AM
I'll take the corpse over Camilla anyday.
__________________
beau2ifulday is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 09:33 AM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 11:39 PM
celebacy
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 10:27 AM   #7
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,471
Local Time: 02:39 AM
on a serious note: why? why be celibate? what's the benefit?
__________________
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 10:46 AM   #8
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 07:39 AM
I'll take the corpse also.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 11:10 AM   #9
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2democrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: England by way of 'Murica.
Posts: 22,140
Local Time: 07:39 AM
i'll take william and/or harry
__________________
U2democrat is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 11:53 AM   #10
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Why do people care? It isn't as if Prince Charles is a supermodel himself. He's a rather plain looking royal, but do we ever talk about how ugly Prince Charles is? Nope. The burden is always on the woman. Personally? I liked Diana, but Charles and her looked like a complete mismatch. They should have married different people.

I wish Charles and Camilla the absolute best, and they should have married three decades ago. But that's right. Royals are still put to antiquated rules about who they can and can't marry. The difference between a "commoner" and a "royal" is the label; that's it.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 02:02 PM   #11
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Zoomerang96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: canada
Posts: 13,459
Local Time: 01:39 AM
camilla is still a horse, melon.

royalty blood, is there anything more pure?!?!!? to be associated in any way with the divine romanovs must be a most extatic feeling!!
__________________
Zoomerang96 is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 02:35 PM   #12
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Zoomerang96
camilla is still a horse, melon.
And so is Charles. It's a match made in ugly heaven.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 02:36 PM   #13
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,781
Local Time: 02:39 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Zoomerang96
royalty blood, is there anything more pure?!?!!? to be associated in any way with the divine romanovs must be a most extatic feeling!!
I'm distantly and indirectly related to the Romanovs.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 03:18 PM   #14
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 07:39 AM
Good grief melon, you're distantly related to the Romanovs? Do you mind if I ask what your ethnic background is? I'm just curious, it's the historian in me.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 03-05-2005, 05:40 PM   #15
ONE
love, blood, life
 
indra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,689
Local Time: 03:39 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon
Why do people care? It isn't as if Prince Charles is a supermodel himself. He's a rather plain looking royal, but do we ever talk about how ugly Prince Charles is? Nope. The burden is always on the woman. Personally? I liked Diana, but Charles and her looked like a complete mismatch. They should have married different people.

I wish Charles and Camilla the absolute best, and they should have married three decades ago. But that's right. Royals are still put to antiquated rules about who they can and can't marry. The difference between a "commoner" and a "royal" is the label; that's it.

Melon
Agreed. I think it's pitiful that women are judged primarily on how they look. Horrible to think that only beautiful people can find happiness or love, yet that seems so often to be the opinion. Maybe in Chuck's eyes Camilla is gorgeous and in Camilla's eyes Chuck is the most handsome creature to ever live. Certainly Diana didn't make Charles happy and Charles didn't make Diana happy.
__________________

__________________
indra is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com