Conservative take on bono

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

V Nura

Refugee
Joined
Jun 14, 2001
Messages
1,760
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/articles/03-25-02/jeffrey.htm

I'll get the rope.....find a lampost



Give Bono's Money Away
By Terence P. Jeffrey


The Irish rock singer Paul Hewson?who insists the world call him Bono?visited Washington last week to demand more U.S. foreign aid. He even enlisted President Bush in the cause.

Here?s a suggestion for the President: Slap a 100% tax on all income earned here by foreign rock stars to offset the cost of foreign aid.

Bono?who writes lyrics like "Alright alright, alright, alright, alright/It's alright, it's alright, it's alright, it's alright"?sees himself as a poet. The Bono Tax would be such an act of poetic justice you have to believe he?d love it.

Here?s how it would work: He gets taxed. Americans get a tax cut. The great Pharisee of rock?n?roll can still parade from Ritz to Ritz, in sackcloth and ashes (or is it silk shirts and sashes?), explaining to reporters and politicians how his heart bleeds for the destitute masses over there somewhere. American workers right here would keep more of their pay to put clothes on their own kids.

In a recent issue of People, Bono betrayed the kind of shanty Irish class hatred that would make my Irish kin roll their Kerry blue eyes. "There is an old story about an American and an Irishman looking up at a mansion," said Bono. "The American looks at it and says, ?One day I?m going to live in that place.? The Irishman looks at it and says, ?One day I?m going to get the b------ who lives in that place.?"

For this filthy rich Marxist materialist, America is the mansion. American workers are the b------s. And what he wants to get is our hard-earned pay.

This should inspire exactly one application of Mr. Hewson?s ideology: Level it against him and that pernicious class of millionaires to which he belongs, the foreign rock star.

They live in mansions. Many, if not most, are b-------s. Let?s get their pay.

Unfortunately, rather than seize Bono?s U.S. earnings, Bush invited him to a speech at the Inter-American Development Bank. In the speech, Bush proposed a three-year, $5-billion increase in U.S. foreign aid. Yet, in proposing his Bono-driven aid bonus, Bush correctly attacked the underlying premises of foreign aid itself.

"Contrary to popular belief," said Bush, "most funds for development do not come from international aid. They come from domestic capital, from foreign investment and especially from trade."

Right?that?s why development does not happen where governments steal capital and loot foreign investors.

His new aid program, Bush said, will "reward nations that root out corruption, respect human rights and adhere to the rule of law," and "where people can start and operate a small business without running the gauntlets of bureaucracy and bribery." Of course, Bush then correctly conceded, if regimes that receive foreign aid actually do these things "they will really no longer need it."

I?d bet Bono?s mansion that after Bush?s aid proposal runs its course Bono will be back demanding more?and Third World despots around the world still will be looting their peoples.

The principal difference between then and now is that the despots then will have more of our tax dollars.

Perhaps Bono has given Republicans an even better opportunity than the temptation to take him at his word and seize his wealth. It is a chance to debunk the false pretense of his argument.

Bono is right about the problem. Much of the world lives a miserable existence, subjected to disease and poverty it should be the lot of no human person to endure. But Bono is wrong about the solution. It is not government. It is freedom. Man is not elevated by the state, he is elevated by his own exertions when the state gets out of his way.

That used to be the Republicans? theme song. Have they forgotten how it goes?


________________
 
I you ever felt that something is so stupid that you don't even want to comment on it. This article is a good example.
 
I can't believe he picked one stupid bridge from "Zoo Station" to sum up Bono's lyrical prowess. He couldn't have picked something from "Promenade" or "So Cruel" or (insert much better lyrical example here). I would write to him to complain, except I'd probably get picked on in a future article.
 
I'd like to have a job where they pay me a lot of money to write down nonsense. Would be grand.
 
<HEforum@eaglepub.com>

If you want to reply to Terrence P. Jeffrey, the above is the E-mail to do it.
 
Back
Top Bottom