Anthony said:
Macfistowannabe; do you 'really' think that God 'designed' marriage solely for the purposes of pro-creation? That reads to me something more animal than human. After alll, animals don't need to be married in order to procreate - they do it anyway. I'm sure you'll agree that its more than just pro-creation when it comes to humans, and the 'typical liberal approach' which you seem to have cited must surely consider that, since it offers another approach from the usual specimens of pro-creation that we all are, if you read it your way.
Not "solely" but I believe that we have reproductive organs, and the purpose of those, is to reproduce. We aren't exactly animals, I would hope that our society would promote a higher standard than saying "well if animals do it, I guess it's okay" on a lot of issues.
Anthony said:
Also, don't you find it remotely insulting for couples who decide not to have children, or, even worse, for couples who 'can't' have children?
There must be more to a human relationship than the ability to inseminate someone.
Ant.
P.S - Macfistowannabe, you were doing a lot better before that comment.
Those who choose not to have children, for whatever reason, as long as they would give unwanted children away for adoption and such if they became pregnant, I can understand that. Couples who can't have children, I would think, would adopt children even if they aren't the natural parents.
There IS more than inseminating people, it's showing them love, compassion, moral principles, and obedience. However, I do believe that instead of stating the profound, unproven "born gay" propaganda, give someone hope that they can find relief through medicines, counseling, and faith. How can you believe in miracles if you believe that people cannot overcome obstacles?
In general, I think of explaining my doctorine on God's institution for heterosexual marriage to those who accept the secularized liberal doctorine as trying to explain what they make to be an optical illusion. They have their views, and I have mine. They are hypocritical as well, they do not practice the "tolerance" they preach of, and rather, label conservatives as "bigots", "homophobes", and "hateful". The activists have me convinced that they are every bit as hypocritical as Dobson.