Compromising Women's Rights Compromises Freedom - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-15-2005, 11:56 PM   #1
love, blood, life
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,876
Local Time: 10:40 AM
Compromising Women's Rights Compromises Freedom

[Q]Iran's bitter lessons for Iraq

By Swanee Hunt, Isobel Coleman

International Herald Tribune, February 07, 2005

Before the recent elections, leading Iraqi politicians did their best to assuage concerns of their more secular compatriots by promising moderation and inclusion. But election rhetoric is not reality. An important test will be how these leaders address women's rights in the face of pressure from religious extremists.

While political leaders may profess moderation on many issues, if they do not adhere to basic principles of human rights -- including the equal rights of women -- their moderation is an illusion. We need look no further than across the border to Iran to see how compromising women's rights compromises democracy and freedom.

Despite promises of equality in the run-up to the 1979 revolution, women were systematically stripped of their rights as Iran's clerics consolidated power. They lost rights to divorce and child custody. They were dismissed from official positions. Day care services were terminated, forcing women out of jobs. The hijab, or Islamic covering, was imposed, and violators punished severely.

For the past 25 years, Iranian women have been fighting to regain ground. It is not surprising that many of Iran's leading human rights activists are women who have devoted their lives to fighting for greater liberty and equality for all citizens. At a broad societal level, Iranian women's demands for freedom, education and employment are inexorably changing society; up to 70 percent of university students are now women. Female lawyers, journalists and, more recently, members of Parliament have been key proponents of political and legal reform.

Perhaps most significant, Iranian women have consistently pushed for alternative interpretations of religious texts. They have found important partners in Iran's reformist clergy, vocal proponents of an Islamic Renaissance of sorts. This trend toward finding solutions within an Islamic framework has provided the reformist movement with theologically sophisticated arguments that are better able to combat conservative viewpoints.

Unfortunately, the gains made are under threat from conservatives. In the past six months, more than half a dozen journalists and civil society activists, many of them women, have been arrested for allegedly engaging in propaganda against the regime, endangering national security, inciting public unrest and insulting sacred beliefs. The judiciary's attempts to stifle dissent include the arrests of the editors of leading women's rights journals who have been charged with "moral crimes." The Revolutionary Public Prosecutor's office in Tehran even threatened to arrest Shirin Ebadi, the 2003 Nobel Peace Prize winner. Freedom of the press and civil society in Iran continue to wane.

If the United States is serious about promoting democracy in the Middle East, it must put women's rights at the center of any dialogue. In the case of Iran, more than ever, pressure should be on creating space for human rights and democracy activists. Concern that external criticism undermines reformers is largely misplaced since the movement is already on life support, crushed by the all-powerful Guardian Council, which disqualified 80 percent of reformists from the last parliamentary elections. Today, many Iranians believe that only international diplomatic pressure will force the regime to move on human rights and reform.

Instead of threatening military intervention, America must put the onus on Iran's leadership by making human rights a priority alongside nuclear discussions. The Bush administration should also ease sanctions that prevent American nongovernment organizations from engaging with Iran's fragile but determined civil society groups. Cutting off people-to-people contacts serves the hard-liners' interests in Tehran more than America's.

In the case of Iraq, America should not underestimate the potential of civil society groups, and particularly women's groups, working from within to fight extremism. Elevating the voices of women is a positive way to undermine those who misuse scriptures to justify the narrowest patriarchy. And civil society is a pillar of democracy that holds government accountable.

Neither Iranians nor Iraqis have given up the fight for freedom. But in both countries, democracy remains fragile. In Iran, if America does not adopt a policy that pressures the government instead of its people, then hard-liners will complete their dismantling of pro-democracy forces. In Iraq, if America fails to support civil society groups, and women's groups in particular, extremism will win.

A failure by the United States in either country will leave America's children and their children with even greater difficulties to wrestle with in the future.

Dreadsox is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 04:02 AM   #2
love, blood, life
melon's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,763
Local Time: 10:40 AM
Well, if there's any minor consolation, Shi'ites are traditionally more liberal when it comes to treatment of women. Despite the bad press given to Iran, what isn't said is that Iranian women are quite "liberated" in comparison to other Islamic nations around it. Compare that to Saudi Arabia, and you'll wonder why the press doesn't harp on our "ally" to expand women's rights. Of course, I already know the answer to that question.

Looking at preliminary dialogue, it sounds like Iraq may take a "federalist" approach to law. Shi'ites want to institute "Sharia law" in their territories, and have expressed that they wouldn't mind more secular law in Kurdish regions like they want. Even then, though, the likely Shi'ite PM looks interested in being more "liberal" than the Shi'ite clerical establishment wants.

But back to Iran: it is at a turning point, and I think there should most definitely be hard diplomatic pressure put on the nation. I definitely think it could become democratic on its own, but I can't say when.

My fear, of course, is that Bush is already starting his long march to war with Iran, and that a hasty plan will breed extremism in Iran, rather than democracy.


melon is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 07:56 AM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
verte76's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 02:40 PM
I think Iran could be a democracy, too, if the right amount of pressure is put on their leadership to acknowledge the rights of the reformers. I just hope Bush & Co. don't screw it up with another war.
verte76 is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 08:03 AM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 10:40 AM
There is a lot of oppression in Iran. If there is any peaceful way to resolve conflict and promote reform, I'm all for it. I'm not very optimistic about any possibility of going to war with them, I think there could be a chain of economic and social consequences as a result.
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 08:31 AM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
nbcrusader's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,070
Local Time: 07:40 AM
Let's just ask a basic question from the article.

Are women's rights the central issue to the Iran question? Not just important, but the central, primary issue?
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 02-16-2005, 12:31 PM   #6
New Yorker
Scarletwine's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Outside it's Amerika
Posts: 2,746
Local Time: 10:40 AM
No, again we would be acting against SA if it was.

I fear Iran is now being passed over for the opportunity opened up in Syria.

Scarletwine is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright ©