CNN-Weapons were already missing - Page 3 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-26-2004, 05:52 PM   #31
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 07:14 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by DaveC
Even you wily conservatives can't manage to talk away the disappearance of hundreds of tonnes of weapons due to gross incompetence... ahh it's a good day.
That UN should have gotten rid of those explosives years ago....

__________________

__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 06:00 PM   #32
The Fly
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 90
Local Time: 03:14 AM
Since none of us really know the true FACTS on this yet, I think it's all just speculation. What I do know is that the search, or lack thereof, would have been a tactical decision, not a strategic one. There are stories flying all over the place representing either viewpoint. Each has their own fact and fiction to support their view. What is inexcusable is presenting such a story without having all the facts right before an election. This is especially true of CBS's original programming schedule and certain anti-US forces within the UN. To say the government is hiding something because they haven't responded to a news story within 24 hours is rather petty. Maybe they are a little hesitant to present anything until ALL the facts are known. I'm sure after the initial failure of our intelligence services, this is especially true.
__________________

__________________
Boston01 is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 06:02 PM   #33
New Yorker
 
Flying FuManchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Used to live in Chambana. For now the Mid-South.
Posts: 3,152
Local Time: 10:14 PM
I repeat.... there needs to be some sort of reform in the media... I don't know how, but the more I follow the news, the more that I'm disgusted with the media...
__________________
Flying FuManchu is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 07:27 PM   #34
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 03:14 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by DaveC
Even you wily conservatives can't manage to talk away the disappearance of hundreds of tonnes of weapons due to gross incompetence... ahh it's a good day.
\

There are over 600,000 tonnes of explosives in Iraq, regardless of how this situation with 300 tonnes turns out, its important to keep some perspective here. The US Military and coalition forces are currently accounting for and destroying large amounts of these stockpiles, but it would be foolish to presume that there would have been some way to secure all 600,000 tonnes of explosives within days of the invasion. The fact of the matter is that it will take years to clean up and account for all this stuff.
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 07:58 PM   #35
The Fly
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 33
Local Time: 03:14 AM
Yes taken from a "wily conservative" website.
From one Army Reserve Captain Ian Dodgsen
whose job it is to think about logistics.

"If I were a guerilla "looter" and I was planning such an operation from a military standpoint, here's what the task would require:
Assumptions:

-Each "looter" could haul comfortably about 25 pounds per trip to a truck. (of course after 12 hours that would require superhuman endurance)

-I'd allow 5 minutes per round trip to the truck

-Work day 12 hours

-assume security breaks down 1 week after war starts (that allows 2
weeks before the US troops arrive)

-each pickup truck can carry about 1/4 ton of explosives (I did a quick calculation based upon the dimensions and weight of a block of C-4 and the dimensions of an average small pickup) and it takes 15 minutes to either load or unload the truck.


-the secure hiding place for 380 tons of explosives is 30 minutes away.


Calculations:

-380 tons / [((12hrs/dayX60min/hr) / (5 min per load)) X (25 lbs per load) X 14 days] = 15 loaders X 2 = 30 loaders/unloaders


-30 loaders/unloaders times 200% for breaks, rest, inefficiency, etc. = 60 loaders and unloaders.


-380 tons / [(12hrs/day / 1 hr/round trip,load,unload) X (.25 tons per trip) X 14 days] = 10 trucks and drivers X 1.5 (contingency) = 15 trucks and drivers.


-4 trucks + 10-15 men to supply water, food and other logistical
requirements


Total = 19-20 trucks, 90 men working continuously for two weeks to "loot" facility.


Bottom line this operation would take the resources of AN ENTIRE COMPANY (approx. 100 men) OVER TWO WEEKS, good Intel to know exactly where the "right" explosives were hidden and a means of breaching huge steel doors and concrete of an ASP.


And all of this would have to be done in an area with numerous intel overflights that would be looking for exactly this kind of activity in the combat zone, and not get noticed at all. Like so much of what the New York Times, CBS, and the Kerry campaign feeds us ... it just doesn't add up.
__________________
SouthPark(R) is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 08:04 PM   #36
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 01:14 PM
It's obviously also an administration that never admits a mistake, no matter how fictional.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 10-27-2004, 03:16 AM   #37
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 01:14 PM
Now its straight from the horses mouth
Quote:
US: No Explosives When GIs Arrived
(CBS/AP) The Pentagon said Monday that invading U.S. troops did not find explosives at an Iraqi site where hundreds of tons of bomb-making material were once stored.

The U.N.'s nuclear watchdog alerted the Security Council this week that the Iraqi interim government reports nearly 400 tons of powerful explosives were missing from the al-Qaqaa facility, 30 miles south of Baghdad, as a result of "theft and looting ... due to lack of security."

From the end of the 1991 Gulf War until the March 2003 U.S. invasion, the explosives had been under seal by the International Atomic Energy Agency because they could have been used to trigger nuclear weapons under Saddam's dormant bomb program.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in651082.shtml
__________________

__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com