Clone controversy - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-03-2003, 08:46 PM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Clone controversy

I must be crazy--I never post here because I'm not normally overly fond of controversy. But I want to know what people think about the clone controversy. First of all, do you believe that the cloning is even going on? The group that claims it's doing the cloning won't produce the evidence. They won't show the "cloned" baby or anything. Then, do you think cloning is moral or not? Why or why not?
__________________

__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 09:49 PM   #2
Refugee
 
bonoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, Canada- Charlestown, Ireland
Posts: 1,398
Local Time: 03:24 AM
Well for your first time arnt you asking for alot!
__________________

__________________
bonoman is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 09:58 PM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by bonoman
Well for your first time arnt you asking for alot!

I guess. But I saw a giant thread on the controversy on a Coldplay discussion board, no one got killed and that's a hell of a flamey board. I got curious about opinions on Interference since it's safer here.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:10 PM   #4
War Child
 
Sparkysgrrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: under the table and screaming
Posts: 754
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Cloning any ol thing, or cloning of humans?
Anything that's done by a cult of ppl that think the aliens are going to save them scares me
__________________
Sparkysgrrrl is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:10 PM   #5
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 05:24 AM
Well,

I for one am surprised that Yoda allowed himself to be the future emporer's pawn in the movie. Bringing the clone army in like that is just a serious lack of foresight on Yoda's part.

I also wonder why the Emporer just does not clone himself? Why does he need Darth Vader and Luke Skywalker down the road?

Just my 2 cents.
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:16 PM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Damn. I should have called this thread "human cloning controversy" because yes, I'm talking about human cloning. That religious group that is putting out the clone stories *is* really wacko and scary. If they do indeed have a cloned baby why in hell won't they show it to anyone? Personally, I have my doubts as to whether or not the cloning even took place. Then........ is it right? I'm inclined to think we play God too much as it is.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 10:23 PM   #7
War Child
 
Sparkysgrrrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: under the table and screaming
Posts: 754
Local Time: 02:24 AM
I think we screw with nature too much, and in the case of cloning humans it has a great potential to backfire...
We don't need more ppl running around this planet.

But then again....mabey the gov't has secretly been cloning ppl for years and we just don't know about it.

__________________
Sparkysgrrrl is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 02:59 AM   #8
The Fly
 
drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tucson (soon to be Prescott), AZ ...USA
Posts: 79
Local Time: 03:24 AM

i think its fucked up and wrong on so many levels.....

__________________
drifter is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 08:32 AM   #9
The Fly
 
bleuone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 41
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by verte76
Damn. I should have called this thread "human cloning controversy" because yes, I'm talking about human cloning. That religious group that is putting out the clone stories *is* really wacko and scary. If they do indeed have a cloned baby why in hell won't they show it to anyone? Personally, I have my doubts as to whether or not the cloning even took place. Then........ is it right? I'm inclined to think we play God too much as it is.

It scares me a lot. Today i read in the newspaper that the second cloned baby will be born in a few days in holland.
The lesbien couple is very happy with the birht of thereselfs.
There are so much homeless and poor kids all over world, can't people adopt them?
__________________
bleuone is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 12:31 PM   #10
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
It's being reported on the news that the second cloned baby was born in the Netherlands to that lesbian couple. That's a good question, why can't they adopt? Do they absolutely have to have a damn *clone* of themselves??
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 01:42 PM   #11
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 02:24 AM
Wake Up, Cloning's Day Has Come

By Michael Shermer

January 2 2003

Ever since scientists in the 1970s first began cloning experiments on simple organisms, ethicists and lawmakers have been wringing their hands in Ludditean fear and existential angst over what to do when cloning technology approaches the human barrier.

On Friday, Brigitte Boisselier, the scientific director of Clonaid -- associated with the Raelians, a group that believes that life was seeded on Earth by aliens from other worlds -- announced that her team had done just that with a 31-year-old American woman who, they claim, gave birth to the world's first human clone, nicknamed, appropriately, Eve.

Whether the Raelians succeeded is irrelevant. It is clear that someone, somewhere, some time soon is going to generate a human clone. And once that happens, others will be quick to follow through the door and we will learn whether medical complications make cloning impractical as a form of fertility enhancement.

What I find disturbing is not cloning per se but three fundamental myths about it: the Identical Personhood Myth; the Playing God Myth; and the Human Rights and Dignity Myth.

The Identical Personhood Myth is perpetuated by those who say: "It's a horrendous crime to make a copy of someone." But what they should be saying is: "Clone all you like; you'll never produce another you because environment matters as much as heredity."

The best scientific evidence to date indicates that roughly half the variance between humans is accounted for by genetics; the balance is by environment. Because it is impossible to duplicate the near-infinite number of environmental permutations that go into producing an individual human being, cloning is no threat to unique personhood.

The Playing God Myth has numerous promoters, the latest being Stanley M. Hauerwas, a professor of theological ethics at Duke University who responded to the Clonaid announcement with this unequivocal denouncement: "The very attempt to clone a human being is evil. The assumption that we must do what we can do is fueled by the Promethean desire to be our own creators."

He is not alone in his belief. A 1997 Time/CNN poll, conducted on the heels of the news that a cloned sheep, Dolly, had been born, revealed that 74% of Americans said it was "against God's will" to clone human beings.

But cloning scientists don't want to play God any more than fertility doctors do. What's godly about in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer and other fully sanctioned birth enhancement technologies? Absolutely nothing. Yet we cheerfully accept these advances because we are accustomed to them.

The Human Rights and Dignity Myth is embodied in the Roman Catholic Church's official statement against cloning, based on the belief that it denies "the dignity of human procreation and of the conjugal union."

The same sentiment is also found in a Sunni Muslim cleric's demand that "science must be regulated by firm laws to preserve humanity and its dignity."

The reality is that clones will be no more alike than twins raised in separate environments, and no one is suggesting that twins do not have rights or dignity, or that twinning should be banned.

In the interest of assuaging these and other fears, I propose the Three Laws of Cloning.

* A human clone is a human being no less unique in his or her personhood than an identical twin.

* A human clone is a human being with all the rights and privileges that accompany this legal and moral status.

* A human clone is a human being to be accorded the dignity and respect due any member of our species.

Instead of restricting or banning cloning, I propose that we adopt the Three Laws of Cloning.

The soul of science is found in courageous thought and creative experiment, not in restrictive fear and prohibitions. For science to progress it must be given the opportunity to succeed or fail.

Let's run the cloning experiment and see what happens.
__________________
deep is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 02:37 PM   #12
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Well, gosh, I guess human clones are here to stay, whether or not this particular group is actually producing clones as they claim. We might as well accept clones as fellow human beings, no matter what else we might think about cloning. A while back in vitro fertilization was controversial as hell. Now it's common practice--two of my own friends have in vitro babies.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 03:15 PM   #13
New Yorker
 
Jam Jar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: In the middle of the Pine Barrens with the Jersey Devil
Posts: 2,686
Local Time: 06:24 AM
i think one couple used the dna of thier deceased kid to have another one- so i guess it'll look just like the kid..this fact tells ya- it's duranged, weird, and just plain f*ed up *sigh* that clonaid lady's scary looking...
__________________
Jam Jar is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 03:50 PM   #14
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Jam Jar
i think one couple used the dna of thier deceased kid to have another one- so i guess it'll look just like the kid..this fact tells ya- it's duranged, weird, and just plain f*ed up *sigh* that clonaid lady's scary looking...

Damn! That gives me the creeps!!
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 05:29 PM   #15
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:24 AM
I had to change my sig because of the clone controversy. I've enjoyed telling UFO jokes and stories, including stuff with an imaginary community of U2 fans, for years, but never really cared if UFO's actually existed. A headline about "UFO Cult" associated with the alleged birth in Holland made me feel like I should take "Peace, lemons, UFO's, and Elevation" out of my sig. It's a joke, but I don't know if everyone would understand that it's a joke. So I just took it out.
__________________

__________________
verte76 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com