Cindy Sheehan Arrested by Capitol Police - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-01-2006, 03:36 PM   #16
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Stateless
Posts: 56,381
Local Time: 05:05 PM
i smell a patsy


let's have someone in place to also arrest just so that we can justify arresting sheehan... who shouldn't have been invited into the chambers in the first place, but considering how many will ignore that fact and complain, we'll have this in place to go "ha! i told you so" and poo poo all of them.
__________________

__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 03:52 PM   #17
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,475
Local Time: 05:05 PM
so it's safe to assume that Ms. Sheehan is under surveillance and her phones have been wire-tapped? they knew what she was doing, right down to the t-shirt she was going to wear, and were able to effectively counter-program?

good.

__________________

__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:10 PM   #18
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 02:05 PM
I am sure she has been making over seas phone calls to al-qaeda.



or

1. to Chavez

2. Chavez to Castro

3. Castro to Spanish Newspaper reporter

4. Spanish NP reporter to Al-Jazeera reporter

5. Al-Jazeera to BinLaden tape deliverer

6. BinLaden tape deliverer to Rove/CIA Productions.
__________________
deep is online now  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:28 PM   #19
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Irvine511
so it's safe to assume that Ms. Sheehan is under surveillance and her phones have been wire-tapped? they knew what she was doing, right down to the t-shirt she was going to wear, and were able to effectively counter-program?

good.

Please.

The SOTU is so well scripted, the entire "drama" with Cindy Sheehan and Beverly Young was all scripted before the event.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:29 PM   #20
Blue Crack Supplier
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 30,475
Local Time: 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader


Please.

The SOTU is so well scripted, the entire "drama" with Cindy Sheehan and Beverly Young was all scripted before the event.


how did they know what lines Ms. Sheehan was going to be reading?
__________________
Irvine511 is online now  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:40 PM   #21
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 05:05 PM
I do not believe she was there to protest. I actually believe what she wrote on her blog. It appears to be more than reasonable to me what she is saying in her own words.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index_594.html
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:41 PM   #22
Acrobat
 
enggirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Superstar Trailer Park
Posts: 435
Local Time: 06:05 PM
According to Sheehan's description of events (that I read earlier today), she was given a ticket, gave it to someone else, but then the person who gave her the ticket told her that the press had been alerted...so Cindy got the ticket back. She'd been at a protest earlier in the day and had the shirt on from that. when she entered the building, she was searched, etc., shown up to her seat, and was warm from the walk. she wasn't even completely out of her jacket when the guy who ushered her in said "Protestor," grabbed her and hauled her out, hurting her in the process. she said that she wasn't told to cover the shirt or anything, just taken out and arrested. The other woman was taken out but NOT arrested.

I am so tired of people saying "yeah, you have freedom of speech...but you have to be ready to face the consequences of what you say" but not respecting that the freedom of speech means that sometimes people are going to say things with which you don't agree and you HAVE to respect it because it's freedom of speech...not "you are free to say things, but only if I like them"! AArgh! I'm just annoyed at the whole thing. it makes me nuts.
__________________
enggirl is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:52 PM   #23
Blue Crack Addict
 
phanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in the darkness on the edge of town
Posts: 25,060
Local Time: 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
I do not believe she was there to protest. I actually believe what she wrote on her blog. It appears to be more than reasonable to me what she is saying in her own words.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index_594.html
Censorship is alive and well, even if you don't say anything.
__________________
phanan is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:53 PM   #24
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,501
Local Time: 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
I do not believe she was there to protest. I actually believe what she wrote on her blog. It appears to be more than reasonable to me what she is saying in her own words.


If she had stood up and started shouting or held up a smuggled sign
it would have worked to the Presidents advantage.

If he had to stop for her to be taken out for making a disturbance
he would have gotten a lot of sympathy for the total disrespect of the event and the office.

She would have been roundly condemned and the Dem. congresswoman would be taking shots, too.


However, if she just sat there wearing the T-shirt
and the networks kept panning to her
instead of Laura Bush that would have been a loss for the President.

I am with those of you that believe the Republican Congressman's wife was plant
to justify removing Sheehan.
__________________
deep is online now  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:54 PM   #25
Blue Crack Addict
 
phanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in the darkness on the edge of town
Posts: 25,060
Local Time: 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by deep

I am with those of you that believe the Republican Congressman's wife was plant
to justify removing Sheehan.
I agree - that part had to have been planned.
__________________
phanan is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:56 PM   #26
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 05:05 PM
I would wonder if it was planned specific for Sheehan or was it something that may have just been in place period for anyone.

And I too believe it happened on purpose.
__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:59 PM   #27
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by phanan
Censorship is alive and well, even if you don't say anything.
The rule that was violated has been in effect for a while. People have been removed from Chambers before this Administration.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 05:00 PM   #28
Blue Crack Addict
 
phanan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in the darkness on the edge of town
Posts: 25,060
Local Time: 05:05 PM
It wasn't right then, and it's not right now.
__________________
phanan is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 05:00 PM   #29
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 02:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreadsox
I do not believe she was there to protest. I actually believe what she wrote on her blog. It appears to be more than reasonable to me what she is saying in her own words.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index_594.html
Do you really think those are her own words. Irvine spoke of her needing better handlers. I'm sure people working with MichaelMoore.com would be happy to help.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 05:02 PM   #30
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,881
Local Time: 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader


Do you really think those are her own words. Irvine spoke of her needing better handlers. I'm sure people working with MichaelMoore.com would be happy to help.
I have been reading posts "by her" for months on the web. I have even rattled off a response or two in an email to her.

Yes, I believe it to be her.
__________________

__________________
Dreadsox is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com