Canada left out of Rebuliding of Iraq! - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-11-2003, 03:06 PM   #1
Refugee
 
bonoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, Canada- Charlestown, Ireland
Posts: 1,398
Local Time: 03:28 PM
Canada left out of Rebuliding of Iraq!

Canada had been left of the list of 63 nations eligible to bid on contracts to re-build Iraq. The reason being:

"It's very simple. Our people risked their lives. Friendly coalition folks risked their lives, and therefore the contracting is going to reflect that, and that's what the U.S. taxpayers expect," Bush said.

But what about Canada's commitment of nearly 300 million to the Iraq war? That doesnt count. Most of the 63 nations on the list got on that list by saying they support the war. They gave no MEN or Money. Out of the 63 nations only a handful will be able to take on the loas of a large contract to rebuild, such as Britain, Japan, Italy, the Netherlands, Australia, South Korea and Poland.

Canada couldnt commit anymore troops because they had all available troops in Afganistan fighting with the US soldiers againist the war on terror. Canada was never for nor againist the war only that it said it would follow the UN ruling. It gave 300 million to the US for Iraq it commited troops in Afganistan and yet its been let down because of one little word.

Give me a break!
__________________

__________________
bonoman is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 03:29 PM   #2
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 38,313
Local Time: 04:28 PM
Yeah it's F-ed up. We have the same discussion going on in WAR.
__________________

__________________
BVS is online now  
Old 12-11-2003, 04:42 PM   #3
New Yorker
 
Sherry Darling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,857
Local Time: 06:28 PM
All I can do is reitterate to my Candaian friends that 500, 000 MORE OF US DID NOT VOTE FOR BUSH!

Thanks, that is all.

SD
__________________
Sherry Darling is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 06:07 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 10:28 PM
That's right, Sherry. All I can say is I didn't vote for Bush and don't plan to next year. Since Canada did give some sort of support for the Iraqi people I do not approve of this.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 06:19 PM   #5
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 03:28 PM

Did Canada give proportionately what it could of though.?
Reminds me of a spoiled demanding minimal contributing spouse.

2ndly-
Thats right 500,000 more voted for Gore and he lost the election

DB9
__________________
diamond is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 06:44 PM   #6
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 15,612
Local Time: 05:28 PM
Well, diamond, you're in luck, because your HERO believes that we've contributed enough.

Latest news, according to the Prime Minister of Canada, from Canada.com:

Quote:
''He thanked me for what we're doing in Afghanistan and for the offer of money in the reconstruction of Iraq,'' Chretien told a news conference Thursday.

''As for the news in the newspapers stating that Canada would be excluded from economic activities in Iraq, the president assured me that this was not the case, and that he would be taking action,'' Chretien said. ''And so I thanked him."

The United States announced this week that countries which did not support the U.S.-led war in Iraq last spring, including Canada, would not be allowed to bid on reconstruction contracts worth $18 billion.

But Chretien said Bush called Thursday and, ''he was telling me basically not to worry.''

The prime minister, who retires Friday, received the call before 8 a.m. at 24 Sussex Dr.

The president's exact words on the issue were: ''We are working to rectify the situation,'' said Chretien spokesman Stephen Hogue.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:13 PM   #7
Refugee
 
bonoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, Canada- Charlestown, Ireland
Posts: 1,398
Local Time: 03:28 PM
Ah but antrim you dont get the full story there.

It later came out that what Bush and Jean were talking about was sub-contracts. But they are still banned from making bids!

But we were thanked.

Oh and Diamond.

Canada gave 300 million to the US.
Now if we take that 300 million and put it into perspective from US terms, with the US havig 10-11 times the population and probably 12-13 times the econmoy we could peg that number at around 3 billion in US terms.

Is that not enough?

I challange you to go out and find how many countries put more then Canada into Iraq that is on that list of 63!
__________________
bonoman is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:26 PM   #8
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 03:28 PM
throw in a case of Molsen Golden and we call it even
__________________
diamond is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:29 PM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,763
Local Time: 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond

Did Canada give proportionately what it could of though.?
Reminds me of a spoiled demanding minimal contributing spouse.
Let me remind you, "diamond," that there are almost 30 million people in Canada versus almost 300 million people in the U.S. Add together the population of Michigan and Ohio alone, and you have 2/3 of the population of Canada.

If you are going to argue "proportion," keep that in mind.

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:31 PM   #10
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by melon


Let me remind you, "diamond," that there are almost 30 million people in Canada versus almost 300 million people in the U.S. Add together the population of Michigan and Ohio alone, and you have 2/3 of the population of Canada.

Melon

throw in a case of Molsen Golden and we call it even already
__________________
diamond is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:33 PM   #11
ONE
love, blood, life
 
melon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 11,763
Local Time: 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond
throw in a case of Molsen Golden and we call it even already
It's "Molson."

Melon
__________________
melon is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 07:34 PM   #12
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 03:28 PM
fuzzy math
fuzzy grammar

diamondsexy.
__________________
diamond is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 08:17 PM   #13
War Child
 
Katey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: ON Canada
Posts: 719
Local Time: 06:28 PM
Thanks for cleaing that up about the sub contrats it is true we are still left out of the bidding process.

Quote:
''What I'm saying is, in the expenditure of the taxpayers' money . . . the U.S. people, the taxpayers, understand why it makes sense for countries that risked lives to participate in the contracts in Iraq. It's very simple. Our people risked their lives, friendly coalition folks risked their lives and therefore the contracting is going to reflect that. George W. Bush''
Did George miss something here what did happen to the 300 million Canada has pledged to rebuild Iraq. maybe we need to throw in a case of Molson and a pecan pie for good measure. Ahh George you are not strengthining relations

P.S Godpseed all American, British and Canadian troops ..my heart to you..
__________________
Katey is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 08:19 PM   #14
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,876
Local Time: 10:28 PM
Let Canada bid for the contracts. They are making a contribution, unlike France, Germany and Russia.

But if you want to talk about proportion, the USA is giving over 60 billion dollars of aid to Iraq. Since Canada is 1/10 the size of the USA as others have stated, they should be giving 6 Billion to help Iraq, not the much smaller figure of 300 million. In addition, continuing on the 1/10 idea, Canada should have 13,000 troops in Iraq.
__________________
STING2 is offline  
Old 12-11-2003, 08:19 PM   #15
New Yorker
 
Sherry Darling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,857
Local Time: 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond
fuzzy math
fuzzy grammar

diamondsexy.

Fractions are fuzzy math?



sd
__________________

__________________
Sherry Darling is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com