Bush in 30 Seconds...

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

BVS

Blue Crack Supplier
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
41,232
Location
between my head and heart
Create a TV ad that tells the truth about George W. Bush.

Sick of the propaganda being beamed at you from the current administration's media mavens? Here's a new way to fight back: Enter MoveOn.org Voter Fund's political ad contest. You don't have to be formally trained in the art of filmmaking, just ready, willing and able to create an ad that tells the truth about George Bush.

All eligible submissions will be posted on this web site and rated by visitors. The top rated ads will then be voted on by our panel of esteemed judges, including Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo, and Gus Van Sant. The winning ad idea will be broadcast on television during the week of Bush's 2004 State of the Union address, and the winner will receive a recording of the ad as broadcast.

To enter, just make a 30 second ad and submit it through this web site. Submissions will be accepted between November 24th and December 5th, 2003 and voting on the site will run between December 15th and December 30th, 2003.

Before you make your entry, you'll want to review the submission guidelines, and if you really want to know all the details, you can review the official rules. Good luck! We look forward to seeing your submission.

Want to help spread the word about the contest? Just download and post this poster in places where entrants might hang out.
http://www.bushin30seconds.org/
 
"Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo, and Gus Van Sant."

Would you say this panel of "esteemed Judges" is fair and unbiased and will give a positive add about Bush as much consideration as a negative one?
 
STING2 said:
"Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo, and Gus Van Sant."

Would you say this panel of "esteemed Judges" is fair and unbiased and will give a positive add about Bush as much consideration as a negative one?

They're as "fair and unbiased" as Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, and Roger Ailes (former RNC head and first / current FOX News head) would be on the same subject.

This GOP quest for objectivity is about as laughable as Ponce de Leon's quest for the fountain of youth.

Melon
 
Melon,

"They're as "fair and unbiased" as Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, and Roger Ailes (former RNC head and first / current FOX News head) would be on the same subject."

So your saying Mr. Moore will give my 30 second add as much consideration as anyone elses?

"This GOP quest for objectivity is about as laughable as Ponce de Leon's quest for the fountain of youth."

The look on Howard Deans face when being criticized beats both.
 
STING2 said:
"Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo, and Gus Van Sant."

Would you say this panel of "esteemed Judges" is fair and unbiased and will give a positive add about Bush as much consideration as a negative one?

That's ridiculous. Read the ad again, do you think they're looking for an ad that puts Bush in positive light?

Will Bush's campaign be "fair and unbalanced" and give positive light where warranted with his opponents?
 
Well then why not be honest and simply state, "were looking for NEGATIVE adds about Bush"?
 
STING2 said:
So your saying Mr. Moore will give my 30 second add as much consideration as anyone elses?

About as much of a chance as FOX News living up to its unlawful trademark.

The look on Howard Deans face when being criticized beats both.

http://www.bushorchimp.com/

I wouldn't start talking about looks on faces, because you'll lose that battle every time.

Melon
 
Melon,

"I wouldn't start talking about looks on faces, because you'll lose that battle every time."

Before I saw Howard Dean's face during a period of criticism, I would agree.
 
Last edited:
I wish I'd watched that Democratic debate last night. I haven't been watching the debates but I'm upset about Dean's remarks about Southerners and the Confederate flag (I wouldn't be caught dead with one of those :censored: things)..........so I wish I'd seen his face.
 
Last edited:
Having paid attention to Howard Dean from the beginning, I've known that he deviates from the standard party platform in regards to gun control. Having heard his comments in reference to courting Southern whites, including those waiving the "Confederate flags," I personally knew that the key importance to the statement was not the flag, but about the working class Southern males who currently vote Republican.

While I do think that the comment was in poor taste, I think most of the Democratic candidates are resorting to the same over-PC attitude that has scared many people out of the party. If the best thing that these candidates have to offer is to personally attack each other and blow things out of proportion, then the Democratic Party is in trouble in 2004.

Melon
 
I don't think they really needed to jump all over Dean about the flag remark, but the remark was in really bad taste. We have explosive controversies going on in alot of our states, including Alabama, over the "appropriate" places to put any Confederate flags, particularly as the flag commonly known as the "Confederate" flag is actually the war flag of the Confederacy. It's very divisive around here, with some people claiming it's heritage and some people claiming it's racist. It's very emotional. I think that's why you saw the Southern candidates in particular upset. They've been through the flag dispute at least once.
 
melon said:
While I do think that the comment was in poor taste, I think most of the Democratic candidates are resorting to the same over-PC attitude that has scared many people out of the party. If the best thing that these candidates have to offer is to personally attack each other and blow things out of proportion, then the Democratic Party is in trouble in 2004.

I think this is exactly what will cause the Democratic party to crumble. Without a pressing rally flag (such as abortion), candidates will continue to "out- PC" each other.
 
Rocking Dean
At what was supposed to be a friendly chat with the "youth vote," the Democratic candidates ganged up on the front-runner about his Confederate flag comments.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Josh Benson



Nov. 4, 2003 | BOSTON -- The "Rock the Vote" forum in Boston's Faneuil Hall was supposed to be a feel-good affair, a chance for the candidates to "connect" with America's youth. It was a "Rock the Vote" event in 1992, after all, where Bill Clinton cheerfully told a young crowd that he preferred boxers over briefs.

Front-running candidate Howard Dean found it to be quite different, though, after he came under fierce attack for recent comments that he made about the need to appeal to Southern whites "with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks."

After the debate, Dean dismissed the criticism as "just political silliness." It's true he'd made similar comments previously about white voters and Confederate flags, with no resulting controversy, and he said that he meant it as a call for a broad Democratic constituency.

But his opponents, who view the former Vermont governor as the candidate to beat, seemed disinclined to offer him the benefit of the doubt.

Rev. Al Sharpton, one of two African-American candidates in the race, led the assault, saying Dean's comments were "more like Stonewall Jackson than Jesse Jackson." Sharpton added, "Most poor Southern whites don't wear a Confederate flag, and you ought not to try to stereotype that," he continued, to hearty applause from the college-age audience.

Dean responded by saying that he too was offended by the flag, but that Democrats needed to appeal to "poor white people" if they were to win a national election.

But Sharpton's criticism was immediately followed by an angry lecture from Sen. John Edwards, who has been outspokenly critical of Dean's comments since they were published Nov. 1 in the Des Moines Register. "The last thing we need in the South is someone like you coming down and telling us what to do," he said, jabbing his finger toward a seated Dean.

"Unless I missed something, Governor Dean still has not said he was wrong," Edwards said. "Were you wrong, Howard?"

Dean shot back: "No, I wasn't, John Edwards, because people who vote who fly the Confederate flag, I think they are wrong because I think the Confederate flag is a racist symbol. But I think there are lot of poor people who fly that flag because the Republicans have been dividing us by race since 1968 with their Southern race strategy."

In the post-debate spin room, Dean seemed almost mournful about the tone of the night's events.

"I do think the tone of the attacks was unfortunate tonight, because those kinds of personal attacks are not going to achieve the goal that we seek, which is to make sure that George Bush is not reelected to another term," he told a crush of reporters.

He also singled out Edwards and Kerry for criticism. "I think that for Senator Kerry and Senator Edwards to claim that I'm a racist, which is essentially what they did, is going to hurt their campaigns more than I am. I think people know that I'm not a bigot."

The attacks on Dean were not entirely unexpected, given his status as the apparent front-runner. He is leading in the polls in New Hampshire, and is in a close race with former House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt in Iowa. (Gephardt, in fact, was the only candidate not to show up at the event, choosing to stay in Iowa and campaign.) And such has been the strength of his Internet-driven fundraising that his campaign is considering an option that until now was the exclusive domain of the Bush campaign: forgoing federal matching funds in exchange for avoiding limits on spending during the primary campaign. According to a report Tuesday night by the Associated Press, the campaign is about to announce a "vote" by supporters on whether to bust the spending caps.

Judging by early reaction on the Dean Web site, the vote will overwhelmingly support spending the extra money. But Dean will no doubt come in for more criticism from his rivals if he ignores the spending limits.

For the rest of the field, by contrast, the "Rock the Vote" event was mostly an opportunity to dress casually (in some cases) and to talk about familiar subjects. John Kerry, in an open collar, talked about his experience in Vietnam and in the antiwar movement. Retired Gen. Wesley Clark, wearing a black mock-turtleneck, criticized the Bush administration's conduct of military operations in Iraq. Edwards discussed his rural, working-class roots, Rep. Dennis Kucinich talked about his plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq, Sen. Joe Lieberman talked about his plans to create jobs, and former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun talked about the need for women to have a higher profile in presidential politics.

Sharpton, dressed in his customary three-piece suit, once again had most of the night's punch lines. "I come from the [Martin Luther] King movement," he said. "We believe in dreams. Mr. Bush believes in hallucinations."

The event did have its lighter moments: The candidates were asked if they smoked marijuana, and Edwards, Dean and Kerry said they had, while Sharpton, retired Gen. Wesley Clark, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio said they had not. Braun declined to answer. And as a group, the candidates revealed they favored PCs over Macs.

And Dean tried to keep his sense of humor. Reacting to criticism by Kerry over his position on gun control, Dean grinned and said, "I told a group of press people in Iowa, the reason I knew I was the front-runner is that I keep picking buckshot out of my rear end all the time."

It's certain Dean is in for more buckshot in the coming days. As the storm over his comments on Southern whites show, the plain-talking style that is so appealing to many frustrated Democrats can be troublesome to his candidacy, especially now that he's receiving much greater scrutiny than when he was an underdog candidate. Dean made virtually identical comments as far back as the DNC meeting last February, telling the crowd that "white folks in the South who drive pickup trucks with Confederate flag decals on the back ought to be voting with us because their kids don't have health insurance either, and their kids need better schools, too." Back then, he received standing ovations from the crowd and glowing reviews in the media.

He will also be blasted for his apparent desire to withdraw from the public finance system, which -- when he was a poor underdog early in 2003 -- he said he would abide by, contrasting his poverty with the campaign of President Bush. (The Bush campaign did not abide by the primary spending limits in 2000, and won't this year.)

But if his recent past is any indication, Dean will try to turn the assaults upon him to his advantage. Back on June 22, after a contentious appearance on "Meet the Press" in which he appeared to stumble under tough questioning, Dean supporters rallied to his defense by pouring in donations on his Web site. Tonight, after CNN host Anderson Cooper asked him about a past comment on gay partnerships, Dean accusingly fired back: "You sound like Tim Russert."

FYI, I can't link this article, so that's why I'm quoting the whole thing.

Melon
 
nbcrusader said:


I think this is exactly what will cause the Democratic party to crumble. Without a pressing rally flag (such as abortion), candidates will continue to "out- PC" each other.

this is an accurate assesment.
dramaqueens trying to out dramatize eachother w/Angry Nikita Dean feeling the most spurned.:ohmy: :sexywink::angry:

DB9
 
Of course the film is supposed to be negative. It's directed to move-on members - most who are extremely critical of this admin. regardless of political affiliation.

I'm sure Bush will be hiring very expensive advertising agencies with his record setting 200m to make positive ads. But some of you think this is wrong?

I also agree with melon, while not phrased correctly I agree Dean trying to reach out to the working class marginally poor of the south.
 
Last edited:
Everyone else in the Democratic campaign is after Dean. I just got an irate e-mail from someone who is a big shot in the Kucinich campaign. They're ripping him to shreds over the "flag flap" as the controversy is called. This is what happens when you're the front-runner. I agree that the controversy is dumb but that's local politics for you. Yes, Southern liberals can act like asses too.
 
Scarletwine said:
Of course the film is supposed to be negative. It's directed to move-on members - most who are extremely critical of this admin. regardless of political affiliation.

So, is this about truth, hate, or something in between?
 
nbcrusader said:


So, is this about truth, hate, or something in between?

It's about perception. Their is no truth anymore in politics. It's all about perception. Many believe this administration has lied, many feel they haven't. We may never know, it may stay between God and those in the administration.

Bush may present certain facts that make his case. Doesn't mean he exactly lied, but it also doesn't mean it's the truth.

Move On may certain facts that make their case.

Absolute Truth on a large scale like this may never happen. Right now it's just people's perceptions.
 
BonoVoxSupastar said:


It's about perception. Their is no truth anymore in politics. It's all about perception.
I agree

I think not even the politicians themselves know anymore whether they were led by the truth or by perception
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom