Bush documents fake, CBS apologizes - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-20-2004, 03:03 PM   #1
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,927
Local Time: 11:26 PM
Bush documents fake, CBS apologizes

http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=3...Administration
__________________

__________________
U2Kitten is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:19 PM   #2
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,927
Local Time: 11:26 PM
They were fakes after all!

CBS Apologizes Over Bush Guard Duty Memos

18 minutes ago

By DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer

NEW YORK - CBS News apologized Monday for a "mistake in judgment" in its story questioning President Bush's National Guard service, claiming it was misled by the source of documents that several experts have dismissed as fakes.

The network said it would appoint an independent panel to look at its reporting about the memos. The story has mushroomed into a major media scandal, threatening the reputations of CBS News and chief anchor Dan Rather.


It also became an issue in the presidential campaign. The White House said the affair raises questions about the connections between CBS's source, retired Texas National Guard officer Bill Burkett, and Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites)'s campaign.


Rather joined CBS News President Andrew Heyward in issuing an apology Monday.


"We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry," Rather said. "It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism."


Almost immediately after the story aired Sept. 8, document experts questioned memos purportedly written by Bush's late squadron leader, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, saying they appeared to have been created on a computer and not on the kind of typewriter in use during the 1970s.


CBS strongly defended its story. It wasn't until a week later — after Killian's former secretary said she believed the memos were fake — did the news division admit they were questionable.


Burkett admitted this weekend to CBS that he lied about obtaining the documents from another former National Guard member, the network said. CBS hasn't been able to conclusively tell how he got them, or even definitely tell whether they're fakes or not. But the network has given up trying to defend them.


"Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report," Heyward said. "We should not have used them."


The Associated Press could not immediately reach Burkett for comment. Rather was set to interview Burkett Monday night on CBS' evening news program.


Heyward told The Associated Press it was not clear what, if any, disciplinary action would be taken against CBS News employees. Besides tainting the network's flagship broadcast, "60 Minutes," the report was a damaging blow to Rather, 72. Some have suggested the scandal, along with the low ratings of the "CBS Evening News," could hasten Rather's retirement.


"Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully," Rather said.


Alex Jones, director of Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, said it appeared to be an honest mistake by CBS, not a willful attempt to deceive. But he said the network was too slow to respond.


"I think that their delaying and obvious resistance to acknowledge the evident realities has kept the story alive a lot longer than it needed to be and was a lot more damaging to CBS than it needed to be," he said.


For "60 Minutes," it's the biggest ethical mess since the 1995 incident captured in the movie "The Insider," which depicted the newsmagazine caving to pressure from CBS lawyers and not airing a whistleblowing report from an ex-tobacco executive.


Jones said questions will probably center on the story's producer, Mary Mapes. She's one of the network's top investigators and broke the story of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal photos. Her immediate boss is Josh Howard, recently named executive producer of the "60 Minutes" Wednesday edition.


White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the White House appreciated CBS's expression of regret but that there were still serious questions about Burkett.

"Bill Burkett, who CBS now says is their source, in fact is not an unimpeachable source as was previously claimed," McLellan said. "Bill Burkett is a source who has been discredited and so this raises a lot of questions. There were media reports about Mr. Burkett having senior level contacts with the Kerry campaign."

The Kerry campaign has said it had nothing to do with the story.

Burkett, a Democrat, sent an e-mail last month to several Texas Democrats, saying he had passed along information to former Georgia senator and Kerry supporter Max Cleland about information that would counter criticism of Kerry's Vietnam War service.

Cleland said Monday that he does "not have any knowledge" about documents used to support the "60 Minutes" story.

Heyward told The AP he has "no reason to believe either the Kerry campaign or the Bush campaign was involved in this."

"A lot of reporting went into this story," Heyward said. "It's not as if one person's account was taken at face value."

The call for an independent review was reminiscent of CNN's "Tailwind" scandal in 1998. The cable network retracted a story that the U.S. military had used nerve gas in Laos during the Vietnam war.

CNN appointed independent panels to look into the "Tailwind" story and the missed election calls of 2000. Both panels helped to restore trust in the network and resulted in real changes to the networks' operation, said Tom Johnson, CNN's chief executive at the time.

"As with all professions, we screw up at time," Johnson said. "We need to admit it when we do."

The so-called Killian documents indicated he was being pressured to "sugarcoat" the performance ratings of a young Bush, then the son of a former Texas congressman, and that Bush failed to follow orders to take a physical. Killian died in 1984.

Heyward said he did not think CBS' story was the result of any bias against Bush. The National Guard service story was "a legitimate area of inquiry" that several news organizations were pursuing, he said.

"The story of how this happened is going to be a much more interesting story than the veracity of these documents," Jones said, "and I hope CBS will tell it."
__________________

__________________
U2Kitten is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:21 PM   #3
Blue Crack Addict
 
U2democrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: England by way of 'Murica.
Posts: 22,140
Local Time: 04:26 AM
just because the documents were fraud doesn't mean the contents are.
__________________
U2democrat is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:22 PM   #4
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,927
Local Time: 11:26 PM
That's usually why people fake documents because there aren't any real ones that say what they want because they don't exist and aren't true.
__________________
U2Kitten is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:32 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by U2democrat
just because the documents were fraud doesn't mean the contents are.
Do you want news sources perpetuating stories for which they have no evidence??

I'll take a dozen swift boat veterans to a fake document any day.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 03:58 PM   #6
New Yorker
 
Scarletwine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Outside it's Amerika
Posts: 2,746
Local Time: 11:26 PM
I'd say his secretary is collaborative evidence enough.
__________________
Scarletwine is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 04:14 PM   #7
ONE
love, blood, life
 
zoney!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: six metro locations
Posts: 11,293
Local Time: 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Scarletwine
I'd say his secretary is collaborative evidence enough.


The documents may be false...but I still think there is validity to the alegations.

The whole campaign has come down to swift boat captains and a national guard secretary!

__________________
zoney! is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 04:16 PM   #8
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 08:26 PM
Who needs facts anymore? We are campaigning on the perceptions of the candidates.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 04:20 PM   #9
ONE
love, blood, life
 
zoney!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: six metro locations
Posts: 11,293
Local Time: 10:26 PM
KILL YOUR TELEVISON
__________________
zoney! is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 06:19 PM   #10
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 02:26 PM
So a single democracrat secretary means that while the documents may be fake, their intention is real. This is postmodern bullshit artistry at its finest, along the lines of "It's the truth because although its fake, it tells part of a bigger truth".
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 06:27 PM   #11
New Yorker
 
Flying FuManchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Used to live in Chambana. For now the Mid-South.
Posts: 3,149
Local Time: 11:26 PM
LOL... If a "credible" news organization starts using forgeries with false accuations to push stories then we might as well accept all tabloids as mainstream media. Facts be damned if Col. Staudt's reputation is brought down or he's made to look like an ass. That's the man mentioned by pseudo Killian, in the forged documents, who told Killian to "sugarcoat" things.

Of course to some people. Any means necessary to bring down Bush. Right?

I think its sad that people justify the use of forgeries to attack/ critique a President/ person. If Rather wanted to make a hit piece, then he should have gonr to the secretary in teh frist place. Of course, her interview wouldn't have had as big or as negative an impact those "memos" had. CBS/ Rahter just got even more pathetic.
__________________
Flying FuManchu is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 07:24 PM   #12
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,927
Local Time: 11:26 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by A_Wanderer
So a single democracrat secretary means that while the documents may be fake, their intention is real. This is postmodern bullshit artistry at its finest, along the lines of "It's the truth because although its fake, it tells part of a bigger truth".
LOL. And if this had been something Bush had been caught faking on Kerry the people here would be all over it like stink on shit instead of trying to make excuses.
__________________
U2Kitten is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 07:36 PM   #13
New Yorker
 
sharky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,637
Local Time: 11:26 PM
Rather was trying to be a good journalist and do a story. His problem was that he didn't fully question the motives behind his "unnamed source" for these documents. If we attack Rather, we should attack Novak for the same thing. A Republican outed the wife of a Democratic rival as a CIA agent and rather than questioning the motive, Novak ran it as is, risking the country and Valerie Plame's life -- much harsher than the documents in this case.

And it still doesn't answer the big question: WHERE WAS BUSH? Even he hasn't been able to answer that question after years of denying he did anything wrong. PROVE IT!

Texans for Truth will pay $50,000 to anyone who can prove Bush served in Alabama. The money, after several weeks, is still up for grabs.
__________________
sharky is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 07:39 PM   #14
ONE
love, blood, life
 
A_Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Wild West
Posts: 12,518
Local Time: 02:26 PM
Hmm, interesting - the obviously fake documents are run but it was the fault of ignorance and not bias by Rather and CBS that let it happen.

On an unrelated topic a journalist ran a story that had more damaging effects but this one helped Republicans therefore we should forget about the fake documents and attack Bush.

Simple really.
__________________
A_Wanderer is offline  
Old 09-20-2004, 09:15 PM   #15
New Yorker
 
Flying FuManchu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Used to live in Chambana. For now the Mid-South.
Posts: 3,149
Local Time: 11:26 PM
Novak is a putz too, but again he got heat and may still get some heat (doubt it though). A wrong done by Novak doesn't justify wrongs done by CBS.
__________________

__________________
Flying FuManchu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com