phillyfan26
Blue Crack Supplier
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Messages
- 30,343
struckpx said:
if you want to falsely accuse them, be my guest. i won't be apart of it.
How is it a false accusation?
struckpx said:
if you want to falsely accuse them, be my guest. i won't be apart of it.
phillyfan26 said:
How is it a false accusation?
struckpx said:
show me where the bush administration has been found guilty of conspiracy?
unico said:
ask libby.
struckpx said:
show me where the bush administration has been found guilty of conspiracy?
struckpx said:
so they aren't guilty, are they.
unico said:
of course they are. they know what they did. we know what they did. they have now, and always have considered themselves above the law. they are playing games to avoid being held accountable.
struckpx said:
how do we know what they did?? are you 100% sure? its Washington. do you honestly believe everything you read or watch or hear? until something is done in court, they are innocent according to our constitution. libby is guilty.
struckpx said:
how do we know what they did?? are you 100% sure? its Washington. do you honestly believe everything you read or watch or hear? until something is done in court, they are innocent according to our constitution. libby is guilty.
phillyfan26 said:
That is absolute bullshit. Give me a break.
To say the court is always correct is bullshit. To say that the court is the only way to judge someone is bullshit.
What do you think cover-up means?
phillyfan26 said:
But, I've heard the arguments in defense of the administration, all of them, in this thread. They're pathetic.
anitram said:
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong." -- Richard Dawkins
anitram said:
"When two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong." -- Richard Dawkins
struckpx said:
This quote does not apply here sadly.
You cannot jump to conclusions on evidence, most of which has been leaked by the opposing party's sources. If you guys want to start accusing people, fine. Pretty low class if you ask me. That is what elementary kids do. "Teacher, he took my pen." That is what you guys are doing.
I am waiting until some hard evidence comes out. Enough of the hear say.
Think very carefully about this statement.You cannot jump to conclusions on evidence
Diemen said:You're pretty funny, struck. Basically as soon as you get caught with no evidence to back up your stance, you turn on those who catch you on it, rather than go about finding the evidence to back it up. Doing the latter would work wonders on your debate skills.
Oh and just because the evidence doesn't come from your party doesn't mean it automatically comes from the opposing party. This evidence comes from various, both within the Democratic party and independent of it.
struckpx said:You cannot jump to conclusions on evidence,
struckpx said:
So, to say that you are always correct is 100% right?
phillyfan26 said:
Does that have anything at all to do with my statement? I mean ANYTHING.
Diemen said:You're pretty funny, struck. Basically as soon as you get caught with no evidence to back up your stance, you turn on those who catch you on it, rather than go about finding the evidence to back it up. Doing the latter would work wonders on your debate skills.
struckpx said:
yes, everything. you said that the court of law is not merit, and therefore we can make false accusations.