BonoVoxSupastar said:
Having children doesn't give anyone special treatment. There are a lot of fathers in prison. He should of thought of his children and his country before he perjured himself.
hahaha, wow. no remorse.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Having children doesn't give anyone special treatment. There are a lot of fathers in prison. He should of thought of his children and his country before he perjured himself.
struckpx said:
Cheney yes, Bush no. Should the middle man who is covering up for Cheney with two young children have to sit in jail for two years over this, no.
Vincent Vega said:
True statement. Bush doesn't know what's going on on every issue.
struckpx said:
hahaha, wow. no remorse.
BonoVoxSupastar said:
Why should I have remorse? Why do you have remorse? Is it only because you are a conservative?
struckpx said:
far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.
struckpx said:
far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.
struckpx said:
i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.
struckpx said:
far from. i don't affiliate with parties. i just call them as i see them and bashing bush on this is absurd. go after cheney. bush is doing his job and his right that the constitution grants him.
phillyfan26 said:
And calling them as you see them doesn't work when you don't open your eyes. It's hard to see with your eyes shut.
struckpx said:
so now i can only view it as your way or it isn't correct?
phillyfan26 said:
No. I'm saying that you don't read all the posts and don't look up all the facts.
Please address the rest of that post you quoted.
struckpx said:
hahaha, ok. No comment. It's not worth arguing.
phillyfan26 said:
You've admitted this, though, so how am I incorrect?
Please address the rest of my post you quoted before.
struckpx said:
I don't want to get into it. I am not going to comment anymore on this matter. It is a waste of time arguing over nothing. And I could write out the history of every event in this case. That still wouldn't be enough evidence for some here. So, go ahead and continue w/ your "Impeach Bush" slogans.
struckpx said:
I don't want to get into it. I am not going to comment anymore on this matter. It is a waste of time arguing over nothing. And I could write out the history of every event in this case. That still wouldn't be enough evidence for some here. So, go ahead and continue w/ your "Impeach Bush" slogans.
Lila64 said:Is there any hope for this country?
Slipstream said:This is the exact reason why I support our(UK, Canada, Oz, NZ) constitutional monarchy system.
Our shared Queen has power, but doesn't use it. The government(PM) uses the power but doesn't hold it. Our head of state and head of government are 2 different people. Democracy working at it's best. This could be another topic though.
struckpx said:
The President has some power, Congress has some, and the Judicial Branch has some. They all even out.
Our democracy is still the finest ever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PardonLJT said:I still don't understand why a president has this right to commute and pardon people...it is like a big 'fuck you' to the court system and the rule of law. Hmm I wonder if the pm of the UK has any similar rights....it just seems a completely daft rule.
Slipstream said:struckpx -- "So you are saying that our democracy doesn't work?"
I never said your democracy doesn't work. I said, this current pardon issue with Libby is why I prefer our constitutional monarchy system over the US system.
The example being, our Queen can only grant pardons on advice of the gov't. Pardoning power in the US is granted to the President.
struckpx said:
...regarding checks and balances. ... They all even out.