pub crawler
New Yorker
deep said:One can aspire to be a pacifist and not be a pacifist.
deep, your point is well taken and, to be fair, I should clarify the comments I've made with respect to STING2.
I agree with you and STING2 that one can aspire to be a pacifist and not be a pacifist. I aspire to be a pacifist. I hope I am "pacifistic" in my actions. Indeed, I consider myself "pacifistic" in my actions. But I do not claim to be a 100% pure Pacifist any more than I claim to be a perfect human being or a perfect Christian.
STING2 stated that "everyone who is not evil aspires to be a pacifist." STING2 is not evil, therefore I can only conclude that he is aspiring to be a pacifist.
Based on what I've read of STING2's posts in the FYM forum, I have been tempted to write that STING2 is in love with the idea of war (though he makes claims to the contrary) but I haven't written that because I can't back it up, i.e., I haven't read everything he's written and, of his writings that I have read, I don't even remember everything.
Nevertheless, in this thread STING2 has made it perfectly clear where he stands:
STING2 said:I defend the use of USA military force in every single war the USA has ever fought in because I believe it was just and necessary.
That, to me, is an amazing statement, and it confirms my suspicion that STING2 simply won't listen to any argument against war, no matter how rational. It's easy for me to believe STING2 made up his mind about the current situation in Iraq before he was even fully aware of the circumstances.
Furthermore, STING2's unequivocal, unquestioning support for the use of (U.S.) military force leads me to ask the following question: In what way is STING2 aspiring to be a pacifist?