Big brother,good or bad? - Page 2 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-21-2005, 06:27 PM   #16
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 03:52 AM
BVS, you're putting way too much fecal matter between the lines. Why can't you just read the post and take it for what it is? I never said that anything I don't like is by sickos. Nice try, though.
__________________

__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 06:36 PM   #17
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 01:52 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader
For some, any "standards" would be considered censorship.

In the alternative, can we not then consider any limitation for standards purposes "not censorship"?
Well there is a lot of gray area and can be a slippery slope.
__________________

__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 06:41 PM   #18
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,697
Local Time: 01:52 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
BVS, you're putting way too much fecal matter between the lines. Why can't you just read the post and take it for what it is? I never said that anything I don't like is by sickos. Nice try, though.
Nice way with words.

You said censorship in moderation is good and that there would be no need for censorship if there weren't sickos. You also go on to say:
Quote:
In my personal opinon I think that we've stressed out the sex to a point where we expect it in everything we see, and then we are told that another person's sex life is their business.
So by that definition anyone who had a different view of sex than you, you would like to see censored and therefore a sicko.

How did I misinterpret that?
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 09:04 PM   #19
Blue Crack Addict
 
verte76's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hoping for changes
Posts: 23,331
Local Time: 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader
For some, any "standards" would be considered censorship.

In the alternative, can we not then consider any limitation for standards purposes "not censorship"?
If the standards were "no nudes" then we'd have to leave out half the Renaissance. At least. Also my favorite Delacroix, "Liberty Leading the People", which is in the Louvre.
__________________
verte76 is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 12:26 PM   #20
Refugee
 
boystupidboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 2,026
Local Time: 06:52 PM
what about censorship on,say,an internet site like this one? Should moderators have the final say on what goes on in this site?Who makes them the moral referee?who monitors them?.....just a thought.....
__________________
boystupidboy is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 06:54 PM   #21
The Fly
 
Bono'sTyee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 115
Local Time: 11:52 PM


Aw man....
__________________

__________________
Bono'sTyee is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com