It certainly sounds discriminatory, though it's a bit hard to evaluate without knowing more about what went into the airlines' decision process. For example, were they going on vague speculation that men are somehow more dangerous to children (in ways pertinent to the situation), or were they looking at research suggesting most children feel more comfortable around female strangers than male ones, etc. (Though even if the latter were true, it would hardly seem reasonable grounds for a categorical ban--as opposed to a 'preference,' such as they currently have for seating children next to no-one.)A Qantas spokesman confirmed the Australian airline, which operates domestic flights in New Zealand, does not allow unaccompanied children to sit next to men. The spokesman said the airline believed it was what customers wanted.
Ms Paul said Air New Zealand tried to seat children near a crew area so crew could keep an eye on them and, when possible, children were seated next to an empty seat. "Sometimes this isn't possible, so the preference is to seat a female passenger next door to an unaccompanied minor."
This is probably a stupid question...but is that an actual job title?The incident, which happened a year ago, irked Mr Worsley so much that he recently contacted National Party political correctness eradicator Wayne Mapp.
mattgerth said:I wish they would implement that policy in the States. Thers is nothing worse than having to sit next to or around children on a flight.
melon said:Nice to see straight men get a little dose of homophobia for once.
Melon
U2Scot said:Yes, because it's well known that 2 wrongs DO make a right.....
Irvine511 said:i'm really not surprised.
i've taught swimming lessons for years, and i've taught pre-school, and both times i was warned -- strictly off the record, and before i was "out" -- that i should never, ever put myself in any sort of situation where anything remotely questionable could be inferred into the situation. you learn how to give one-armed shoulder hugs, to make sure that your hands are visible at all times (and this can be difficult when you're trying to help a 7 year old swim a lap in the big pool or trying to correct a breaststroke kick).
it's a dose of reality that men have to face, straight or gay.
LivLuvAndBootlegMusic said:Well, if it makes you men feel any better, I've had a lot of female professors who've done their time in the business world basically give us "lessons" on how we have to dress and act if we're working around mostly men. Like if we wear a skirt (a nice one, I'm not talking about leather minis) or blouse, but the men are all wearing nice pants/suit outfit, we should assume that our clothes are intended to be a come-on and instead have to also wear black pants and a suit so it's less noticable that we're female.
joyfulgirl said:Oh boo hoo. Poor men, lol.
Irvine511 said:
well ... okay, on the whole i agree with you, but it's never a nice thing to have to work under the assumption that you are a potential child molestor.
joyfulgirl said:
Of course not. I am not in favor of this policy. Yet given how it's been men who have subjected others to discrimination throughout history, I just can't get all that upset when it is reversed on them. Fair to all the wonderful men who do not discriminate and in fact defend others against discrimination? Of course not. Can I argue against this policy? Absolutely. But I guess overall I don't care that much. Sorry.
Irvine511 said:if it were men discriminating aganist someone else, it wouldn't be news.
anitram said:I think you're all reading this the wrong way.
It's actually a continuation of discrimination against women. Now we're gonna be stuck sitting to somebody's annoying, screaming brats on a 10 hour flight. Great.
joyfulgirl said:
Of course not. I am not in favor of this policy. Yet given how it's been men who have subjected others to discrimination throughout history, I just can't get all that upset when it is reversed on them.
nathan1977 said:
Say what now? It's only men that discriminate?
A principle is either wrong, or it isn't.
nathan1977 said:Say what now? It's only men that discriminate?
A principle is either wrong, or it isn't.
joyfulgirl said:
Of course it's wrong. I was simply being honest in a knee-jerk kind of way, which is why I added the "lol" in my original post, kind of like ha ha now you white men know what it feels like.
melon said:Nice to see straight men get a little dose of homophobia for once. You all might be child molesters, you know.
Melon
whenhiphopdrovethebigcars said:That sounds very bitter.