Macfistowannabe said:
Nothing is being 'banned', in fact, you're trying to overturn a law.
Yeah, a law that restricts women from exposing their chests because it's "obscene" to some people. Since they feel they can restrict things based on their defintion of "obscene", I suppose this means I can do it, too, right?
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
*************************************************http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/stripc2.htm
Sexual Abuse
Stripclub customers frequently grab women’s breasts, buttocks, and genitals. Customers often attempt and succeed at penetrating strippers vaginally and anally with their fingers, dollar bills, and bottles. Customers expose their penises, rub their penises on women, and masturbate in front of the women. Women in this study consistently connected lap dances to the sexual abuse they suffered in the club. "That’s the first thing men try to do when they get close to you and always in a lap dance." Stripclub owners, managers, and staff also expect women to masturbate them and some have forced intercourse on strippers. See Table 2 Frequency of Sexual Abuse and Table 3 Attempted and Completed Sexual Abuse.
*************************************************
Is this something you want to happen more often? Why shouldn't we keep this under control? Why should society be one big strip club?
First off, all that stuff can happen to women who are fully clothed just as easily as it can to women who aren't. Of course I don't want that stuff to happen-what the women are wearing holds no relevance there, those guys are just jerks who deserve to be punished for assaulting these women. Second, aren't you the same one who said that people
should go to strip clubs if they want to see breasts and stuff? Now all of a sudden, you're saying that strip clubs are bad and that society would be just like them if this were legal. Third, by allowing women to be able to expose their chests if they want to, that does
not automatically mean that society will become "one big strip club". It's not like every woman in the country will automatically be running around topless everywhere they go. All we're saying by supporting this being legal is that if a woman does happen to be in a place where guys are topless, and she decides to go topless, too, she should not be punished for that, because if it's not illegal for guys to do that, it shouldn't be illegal for her to do it, too.
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
Name 'em.
Dr. Laura and that Tammy Baker girl aren't people I imagine run around exposing themselves, and yet I still think both of them fit those descriptions better, simply because of the way they present themselves. There's a couple I can think of right off the bat. And of course I agree with the statement that there's people I personally know that you wouldn't that dress conservatively, and yet still fit those descriptions. How you dress doesn't automatically determine what kind of a person you will be.
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
Even flashers avoid older people. They don't care for it in general, and perhaps we should be mindful of their take on it as well.
Well, that's the flashers' choice. It still doesn't automatically mean they shouldn't be allowed to be topless if they wish other places.
Angela
