A REVOLUTION I think we can ALL get behind! - Page 17 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-09-2005, 11:09 AM   #241
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,651
Local Time: 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
If you're going to overturn a law, you better have a better reason than "society should be this way..."
I've gone far beyond that and so have many in here.
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe

This entire thread is devoted to complaining about a law that really isn't too hard to follow.
Separate water fountains weren't "hard to follow" but it didn't mean they weren't demeaning. Calling breast obscene I think is demeaning.
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe

Divorce is often about lust after others. Divorce is often about wanting something else. You've never thought breasts are used to attract men?
This is the weakest argument of them all. Divorce is about money, unhappiness, wanting more out of life, falling out of love, and yes sex. But to blame divorce on breasts...come on. THIS LAW IS NOT GOING TO MAKE WOMEN WALK AROUND TOPLESS. How many times does it have to be said. Women's bodies covered or uncovered attract men. This law will change nothing about sex. Get over that aspect of it.
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe

If they want to, not if they have to.
Since you keep bringing it up, what do you really think will happen? Where will we see women running around topless? Please tell me. Where will these poor children see breasts? And why is it so horrible? Did they not breast feed? Have they not seen art?
__________________

__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:16 AM   #242
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Moonlit_Angel
No-like I said, if people insist women remain covered up, fine. But then we should do that with the guys, too. If girls can't expose their chests, guys shouldn't be able to, either. If guys can, girls should be able to. It's merely a fairness thing.
But, again, under your definition, there is no harm for lack of fairness.
__________________

__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:28 AM   #243
Blue Crack Addict
 
Moonlit_Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In a dimension known as the Twilight Zone...do de doo doo, do de doo doo...
Posts: 19,256
Local Time: 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader
But, again, under your definition, there is no harm for lack of fairness.
No, but seeing as it does break a law in our Constitution that states that we're all equal, that's kind of a factor in the whole deal.

Angela
__________________
Moonlit_Angel is online now  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:24 PM   #244
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
Separate water fountains weren't "hard to follow" but it didn't mean they weren't demeaning. Calling breast obscene I think is demeaning.
Aright, enough said, now pay attention.

The argument has nothing to do with race, it has everything to do with keeping your freaking clothes on in public. If you can't do that, don't go out in public.

Separate fountains have NOTHING to do with this argument. I don't believe body parts are obscene, except when they are improperly exposed to those who would rather not see them.

This whole thread is about meaningless whining about a law that is NOT hard to follow, and the water fountain argument is a new low. If you're going to gripe about something, make it meaningful. Quit acting like your government has done nothing for you.

Here's a good place for all the clowns who can't follow the rules:

__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:33 PM   #245
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
This is the weakest argument of them all. Divorce is about money, unhappiness, wanting more out of life, falling out of love, and yes sex. But to blame divorce on breasts...come on. THIS LAW IS NOT GOING TO MAKE WOMEN WALK AROUND TOPLESS. How many times does it have to be said. Women's bodies covered or uncovered attract men. This law will change nothing about sex. Get over that aspect of it.
Then common sense must be weak to you. I'm not BLAMING DIVORCE on breasts. I'm saying that it would be FOOLISH to legalize this kind of crap when our society is so screwed up.

What are the benefits? Besides allowing people to be AS SLUTTY AS POSSIBLE IN THE PUBLIC EYE?
__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:38 PM   #246
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,651
Local Time: 07:13 PM
Quote:
Since you keep bringing it up, what do you really think will happen? Where will we see women running around topless? Please tell me. Where will these poor children see breasts? And why is it so horrible? Did they not breast feed? Have they not seen art?
You never answered these questions. These are important questions, core to the issue.

Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe

The argument has nothing to do with race, it has everything to do with keeping your freaking clothes on in public. If you can't do that, don't go out in public.
You're right breasts are obscene. In fact let's go back to when bikinis were outlawed on many public beaches or mini-skirts were banned. Better yet let's just make women wear burkas. That way you don't have to worry about any obscenities or offended men or children.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:39 PM   #247
New Yorker
 
sallycinnamon78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,977
Local Time: 02:13 AM
at the entire bloody thread.
__________________
sallycinnamon78 is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:41 PM   #248
New Yorker
 
sallycinnamon78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,977
Local Time: 02:13 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by nbcrusader




Your suggestion is an oversimplification of the criminal justice system.
Whereas yours is just blind.
__________________
sallycinnamon78 is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:45 PM   #249
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,651
Local Time: 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
Then common sense must be weak to you. I'm not BLAMING DIVORCE on breasts. I'm saying that it would be FOOLISH to legalize this kind of crap when our society is so screwed up.
Well let's make men wear shirts, ban tight jeans, close all gyms. We don't want the women to be tempted either.

Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe

What are the benefits? Besides allowing people to be AS SLUTTY AS POSSIBLE IN THE PUBLIC EYE?
This has been answered, so I won't even bother with this question. You're arguments are so one sided it's ridiculous.
__________________
BVS is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:51 PM   #250
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 24,974
Local Time: 08:13 PM
I don't know whether to laugh or cry at the fact that this thread is so popular

I just wanted to add that I read in Glamour @ the hair salon today that nipple enlargement is the hottest new plastic surgery
__________________
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:56 PM   #251
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
Since you keep bringing it up, what do you really think will happen? Where will we see women running around topless? Please tell me. Where will these poor children see breasts? And why is it so horrible? Did they not breast feed? Have they not seen art?
I think we will be one of the most immoral, bastardized, pathetic, mindless, deadbeat societies on the face of the earth. Kids are not the only ones who would rather not see them. Take the older crowd for example. Your argument is mostly just appealing for the biggest complainers of the 12-50 year old crowd, bushed by brainless cliches like "equality", "revolution", "women's rights", yet ending the law would do NOTHING for society. Breast-feeding is something you can do without revealing your ta-tas to the world.

We would do nothing to discourage your daughter from being an attention whore - if you had one. All the "top-free rights" movement does is give crybabies something to whine about.

Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
You're right breasts are obscene. In fact let's go back to when bikinis were outlawed on many public beaches or mini-skirts were banned. Better yet let's just make women wear burkas. That way you don't have to worry about any obscenities or offended men or children.
Nonsense and ignorance all in one paragraph. Pay better attention next time. Our society has established the body parts that should be covered, and you can show plenty of skin without going over the line. Yet some lunatics will continue to complain about they can't show enough.

GET OVER IT.
IT'S NOT THAT HARD.
__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:57 PM   #252
Blue Crack Addict
 
nbcrusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,071
Local Time: 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by sallycinnamon78


Whereas yours is just blind.
Perhaps you could back up your original statement instead of resorting to insult.
__________________
nbcrusader is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 04:01 PM   #253
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 09:13 PM
Quote:
This has been answered, so I won't even bother with this question. You're arguments are so one sided it's ridiculous.
There's a difference between an utterly ridiculous answer and a logical answer. I have yet to see a logical answer.
__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 04:03 PM   #254
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
Macfistowannabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,129
Local Time: 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar

Well let's make men wear shirts, ban tight jeans, close all gyms. We don't want the women to be tempted either.
Pathetic.
__________________
Macfistowannabe is offline  
Old 03-09-2005, 04:12 PM   #255
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 40,651
Local Time: 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Macfistowannabe
Pathetic.
If all you have is insults then this is pointless.

Your divorce argument holds no water. Men can see breasts in movies, topless bars, etc This law will do nothing to the divorce rate. Men can take off their shirts do you see them taking them off to seduce women in bars so that they will cheat? Come on.
__________________

__________________
BVS is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com