MadelynIris said:
If one of my children turn out to be gay (they are still to young), my reaction would be one of shock first (because I am a heterosexual male, I think it's natural), but I would love them will all my heart, just as I always have. They are still my child, and would do everything for them.
But I would not celebrate, or endorse their sexuality. I would not treat their lover/companion as my son/daughter-in-law. I would not buy them birthday gifts. I would not 'act like' it's a marriage. I would love them and respect them, but would not treat the union as right (righteous). I would treat it as sin, and let them know my feelings on it. But, that's as far as it would go. Otherwise, I would love them fully.
By celebrate, I mean, uphold it as good and righteous and support it. I would do the same if one of my children were having pre-marital sex. I would still love them, cherish them, and support them, but would not recognize their sexual relationship as right.
Mark
first, thank you for your honesty. i think you probably speak for a lot of people, but i still find it homophobic, and here's why:
1. you will only find out if your children are gay when they are older, if they are gay, they're gay right now, and have been since brith, probably, and even if you think it's unnatural, it is not unnatural to your child.
2. if your child, hypothetically turns out to be gay, i think you'll find it hard NOT to treat their spouse as one of your family. you apparently love your children very much, doesn't it logically follow that you would love who they love? don't you owe it to your child to support their relationships, especially in a world that makes it so difficult to do so? wouldn't you want to encourage monogamy, commitment, and family? doesn't your child's needs outweigh whatever theoretical objections you might have?
to ignore your child's spouse and treat him like less of a member of the family -- and, therefore, as less of a human being -- might make you feel righteous or morally consistent, but i can guarantee you that you'll be causing untold psychological damage on your child.
example: this weekend, i spoke to a gay couple who had been together for 15 years. one point of frustration that came up (over a long, sprawling conversation) was that one member of the couple has a younger sister on her 2nd marriage. first marriage lasted 10 months, 2nd marriage is now going on 2 years. how can you possibly value a union that is strong enough to last 15 years less than one that lasted 10 months simply because it was a man/man union, and not a man/woman? shouldn't we value the worthiness of a relationship based upon the love and commitment of the members rather than their sexual orientation?
why would you force your child to choose between love and family, when the two should so easily compliment each other?
a quote from an essay in TIME by (the conservative, pro-war) Andrew Sullivan:
"When people talk about gay marriage, they miss the point. This isn't about gay marriage. It's about marriage. It's about family. It's about love. It isn't about religion. It's about civil marriage licenses. Churches can and should have the right to say no to marriage for gays in their congregations, just as Catholics say no to divorce, but divorce is still a civil option. These family values are not options for a happy and stable life. They are necessities. Putting gay relationships in some other category--civil unions, domestic partnerships, whatever--may alleviate real human needs, but by their very euphemism, by their very separateness, they actually build a wall between gay people and their families. They put back the barrier many of us have spent a lifetime trying to erase.
It's too late for me to undo my past. But I want above everything else to remember a young kid out there who may even be reading this now. I want to let him know that he doesn't have to choose between himself and his family anymore. I want him to know that his love has dignity, that he does indeed have a future as a full and equal part of the human race. Only marriage will do that. Only marriage can bring him home."