A_Wanderer
ONE love, blood, life
A massively sized debate on the boundaries of free speech and religious tolerance between Chrisopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry, get it here.
Hitchens going on about "the most toxic of foes, religion"
The argument of design being the fallacy that disproves religion
Of course in the absence of a true believer the "debate" has great approach to a topic that can attract a good deal of malice, but with some damn good points, Hitchens as an antitheist tips the balance nicely.
Religion as an impulse that can be combated ~ now that seems like a good answer for the anti-Gay movement, some sort of Christian recovery service or reformed Christian examples (of course not as a means of duress against free thought - trying to condition someones sexuality against their will is just as wrong as trying to recondition their beliefs against their will).
Faggotry causing earthquake (just wait San Francisco).
Support for equal protection and non-protection of religion
Hitchens going on about "the most toxic of foes, religion"
The argument of design being the fallacy that disproves religion
Of course in the absence of a true believer the "debate" has great approach to a topic that can attract a good deal of malice, but with some damn good points, Hitchens as an antitheist tips the balance nicely.
Religion as an impulse that can be combated ~ now that seems like a good answer for the anti-Gay movement, some sort of Christian recovery service or reformed Christian examples (of course not as a means of duress against free thought - trying to condition someones sexuality against their will is just as wrong as trying to recondition their beliefs against their will).
Faggotry causing earthquake (just wait San Francisco).
Support for equal protection and non-protection of religion
Last edited: