In my opinion being in the military and raping women and degrading them in many other ways is a much bigger disgrace. The quarterback at the Naval Academy was just accused of rape-just one example among many. "Prestige" is irrelevant.
In my opinion being in the military and raping women and degrading them in many other ways is a much bigger disgrace. The quarterback at the Naval Academy was just accused of rape-just one example among many. "Prestige" is irrelevant.
I agree. I haven't had time to read all of the articles, but if this was just some military men/women making their own porn pay-site...oh well, what they do with their bodies is none of my business, as long as no one's being forced and everyone is 18. I don't condone that type of thing, but it's certainly not the biggest issue I'd be worrying about.
[Q]Originally posted by Justin24 I have no problem with gay men or Lesbians serving in the military. [/Q]
Your initial post and reply tell me otherwise.
[Q]Have you been in the military. [/Q]
If you actually read my posts you would see an answer to your......question?
You dont know me so you cant call me homophobic. And if there are homophobic people out there you treat them second class like you obivously showed me.
I agree. I haven't had time to read all of the articles, but if this was just some military men/women making their own porn pay-site...oh well, what they do with their bodies is none of my business, as long as no one's being forced and everyone is 18. I don't condone that type of thing, but it's certainly not the biggest issue I'd be worrying about.
You and I can agree that private citizens have the right to create such a site.....
But those who wear the uniform are subject to the United States Code of Military Justice.
They are not allowed to create such a website. Period. They broke the law and should be punished.
Please understand, that I do not think of this as a homosexual issue. There are MANY male soldiers and female soldiers, much like society, who do participate in many things that I found to be wrong. They too would be subject to the USCMJ.....
BUT.....
Many of the heterosexual behaviors are not PROSECUTED. There is a look the other way because it is HETEROSEXUAL behavior. It is almost fraternity type behavior and it is part of the culture.
In my opinion being in the military and raping women and degrading them in many other ways is a much bigger disgrace. The quarterback at the Naval Academy was just accused of rape-just one example among many. "Prestige" is irrelevant.
Now we are down to three soldiers....and the charges are...
[Q]Three of the soldiers were charged with pandering, sodomy and "wrongfully engaging in sexual acts with another person while being filmed, with the purpose of broadcasting over the internet for money," the army said.[/Q]
These three are not an embarassment to ANYONE but themselves. They are not representative of the entire military, the 82nd airborne, or the homosexual community.
I am so sick of the stereotypical belief that somehow the actions of an individual belonging to a group are representative of the group as a whole.....
I agree. I haven't had time to read all of the articles, but if this was just some military men/women making their own porn pay-site...oh well, what they do with their bodies is none of my business, as long as no one's being forced and everyone is 18. I don't condone that type of thing, but it's certainly not the biggest issue I'd be worrying about.
to Dread.
