2016 US Presidential Election Thread XIV: May This Entertainment Never End - Page 53 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-18-2016, 06:58 AM   #781
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad n U 2 View Post
How do we know it was someone from the 'radical left'? Of course, it's fairly likely, but we don't know for sure.

Yeah, look, and you'll have to define what you mean by the 'moderate left' too.

The "moderate left" was just an analogy. You know, my lazy analogies that are... lazy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad n U 2 View Post
The 'radical left'/'moderate left' against 'radical Muslim'/'moderate Muslim' is a pretty lazy comparison too.

I don't know why it's lazy, but ok.
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 07:01 AM   #782
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobl04 View Post

They absolutely do not and your previous posts about Muslims was super weird. They absolutely should have no obligation whatsoever to come out and say "I don't stand for this" when something bad is done in their name.

Fucking enlighten me as to what I've said is "super weird." Was it when I had a view that was slightly different than yours? Sorry.
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 07:04 AM   #783
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axver View Post
How do we know they were of the left?

I mean the more you ask that, it's just arguing semantics. Are they truly "from the left?" At what point does perception matter more than definition? The way people in this country view it, especially on the right, yes, that person is from the left.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 08:01 AM   #784
Blue Crack Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 18,407
Local Time: 11:26 AM
__________________
PhilsFan is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 08:07 AM   #785
Vocal parasite
 
Axver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 1853
Posts: 147,295
Local Time: 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
I mean the more you ask that, it's just arguing semantics. Are they truly "from the left?" At what point does perception matter more than definition? The way people in this country view it, especially on the right, yes, that person is from the left.
I'm saying we don't know the culprit, so why assume it is somebody from the left? I've seen people speculate it could have been a disaffected Republican - which I find unlikely, but let's not go attributing the act to anyone without proof. Hell, in the absence of a known culprit, there's a chance - admittedly also unlikely - that this was not even political, but an act of violence by some unstable or deranged individual. It's not as if there's never before been an event that's appeared political but subsequently turned out to not be so.

And yes, your comments about Muslims needing to condemn terrorists are fucking weird. I thought we had long since moved on from the idea of people possessing collective responsibility for the acts of random individuals with whom they have only the vaguest of things in common. Do I need to denounce every New Zealander, every atheist, every Australian citizen, every rugby or cricket or Aussie Rules fan, every university graduate, every historian, every twenty-something, and every man who commits a crime because in the loosest sense we share something in common?
__________________
Axver is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 08:31 AM   #786
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
2016 US Presidential Election Thread XIV: May This Entertainment Never End

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axver View Post
I'm saying we don't know the culprit, so why assume it is somebody from the left? I've seen people speculate it could have been a disaffected Republican - which I find unlikely, but let's not go attributing the act to anyone without proof. Hell, in the absence of a known culprit, there's a chance - admittedly also unlikely - that this was not even political, but an act of violence by some unstable or deranged individual. It's not as if there's never before been an event that's appeared political but subsequently turned out to not be so.
Ok, I'll give you that. There are some odd chances that it could be someone very specific. But at that point, you're starting to talk about "was aid given too soon?" The matter of the fact is that right now, this is what it looks like. And perception filtered through media is how society will chew it up. And if, as the left, you don't make enough noise, you're perceived as turning a blind eye.





Quote:
And yes, your comments about Muslims needing to condemn terrorists are fucking weird. I thought we had long since moved on from the idea of people possessing collective responsibility for the acts of random individuals with whom they have only the vaguest of things in common. Do I need to denounce every New Zealander, every atheist, every Australian citizen, every rugby or cricket or Aussie Rules fan, every university graduate, every historian, every twenty-something, and every man who commits a crime because in the loosest sense we share something in common?

First, I'm not sure that was what he was referring to.

Second, it's insulting that you think I'm suggesting muslims are responsible for acts that people who subscribe to a twisted view of their religion commit. Very simply put, I believe the Muslim community (as a community, not just any random Muslim) has a role in educating people as to who they are and what they stand for. To suggest this isn't true is like saying black people have no role in fighting for equality and fair treatment. Women have no role in fighting for their rights to equal pay or to combat sexism. Gay people have no role in fighting for their right to wed. This is the exact same point you're making when you say muslims have no obligation to do anything at all. As an individual gay male I have no responsibility or obligation to do anything, that's true. But the community as a whole absolutely does. Whether or not I want to partake is my decision as an individual. The same applies to anyone who wants their position to be understood. From the individual perspective, and from the community's perspective.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 08:43 AM   #787
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LemonMelon View Post
I'm not an anarchist by any means and do not support property damage as a practical means of systemic change.

That said, not only do I feel no moral obligation whatsoever to monetarily right someone else's wrong, I'm not sure that I care for the idea of being lumped in with another group because I possess a common enemy with them. Broadly generalizing people into factions of "left" and "right," broken down into smaller subgroups of "radical left," "moderate left," "radical right" and "moderate right" also seems misguided to me.

For what it's worth, I was merely using the term "radical left" and "moderate left" as analogies. Hence why I stuck to the quotation marks.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 09:37 AM   #788
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
gump's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,321
Local Time: 11:26 AM
Quote:
Second, it's insulting that you think I'm suggesting muslims are responsible for acts that people who subscribe to a twisted view of their religion commit. Very simply put, I believe the Muslim community (as a community, not just any random Muslim) has a role in educating people as to who they are and what they stand for. To suggest this isn't true is like saying black people have no role in fighting for equality and fair treatment. Women have no role in fighting for their rights to equal pay or to combat sexism. Gay people have no role in fighting for their right to wed. This is the exact same point you're making when you say muslims have no obligation to do anything at all. As an individual gay male I have no responsibility or obligation to do anything, that's true. But the community as a whole absolutely does. Whether or not I want to partake is my decision as an individual. The same applies to anyone who wants their position to be understood. From the individual perspective, and from the community's perspective.
This is such a twisted view. Showing solidarity to victims of a crime is quite different from inferring an obligation for a group to take responsibility for the actions of an individual who simply shares a certain trait with that group. This is not too far away from the #Muslimsreportstuff argument.

In truth, these statements are more often than not used to blame minorities for the isolated actions of certain individuals, and reinforce prejudices and bisases against them. You often hear that blacks need to denounce attacks against the police, that Muslims need to denounce terrorism, or that legal migrants need to denounce illegal immigration. And yet, you never hear such calls when white supremacists attack minorities, religious conservatives attack abortion clinics, or vigilates attack migrants. People should denounce these acts on the basis of their human decency, not because they are members of such and such groups. There's no special responsibility here.
__________________
gump is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 09:48 AM   #789
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
It's like you quoted me, but you didn't read what was written in the quote.

You literally quote the part where I say..

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyNumber7 View Post
you think I'm suggesting muslims are responsible for acts that people who subscribe to a twisted view of their religion commit. Very simply put, I believe the Muslim community (as a community, not just any random Muslim) has a role in educating people as to who they are and what they stand for

And you follow it up by saying ...


Quote:
Originally Posted by gump View Post
inferring an obligation for a group to take responsibility for the actions of an individual who simply shares a certain trait with that group.

Blows my mind.
__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 09:51 AM   #790
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: nyc
Posts: 51,725
Local Time: 11:26 AM
The great thing about donations? They're optional.

If somebody feels that they should donate to help right a wrong? Go nuts.

If you don't? Don't.

Why the fuck are we arguing about it for five pages?
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 09:58 AM   #791
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 15,624
Local Time: 11:26 AM
^

Seriously. Like I said, to each his own.

I saw a psychologist on CNN discussing "election-related anxiety" and how she has to, on a daily basis, "decatastrophize" people. Is that a word?? Anyway, she suggested turning off media. If only.
__________________
anitram is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 10:14 AM   #792
Blue Crack Addict
 
Hewson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your own private Idaho
Posts: 24,294
Local Time: 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Headache in a Suitcase View Post

Why the fuck are we arguing about it for five pages?
Cause Orange Donnie has been a bit quiet (for him) for a couple of days and next debate isn't till tomorrow.
__________________
Hewson is online now  
Old 10-18-2016, 10:32 AM   #793
Blue Crack Distributor
 
Headache in a Suitcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: nyc
Posts: 51,725
Local Time: 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hewson View Post
Cause Orange Donnie has been a bit quiet (for him) for a couple of days and next debate isn't till tomorrow.
Winner.
__________________
Headache in a Suitcase is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 11:12 AM   #794
New Yorker
 
the iron horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in a glass of CheerWine
Posts: 3,158
Local Time: 11:26 AM
I’ve been searching this thread on Hillary Clinton and corruption and have not found any discussions going on. Maybe I missed it somewhere.

For the first time since Ronald Reagan I will be voting for the Republican candidate for president. I agree Donald Trump has flaws. He is far from perfect but compared to Hillary Clinton, he appears almost like a saint.
__________________
the iron horse is offline  
Old 10-18-2016, 11:22 AM   #795
ONE
love, blood, life
 
LuckyNumber7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 11,059
Local Time: 12:26 PM
I thought you were a republican the whole time.
__________________

__________________
LuckyNumber7 is online now  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com