2016 US Presidential Election Thread Part XI

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know you guys played down the seizure video I posted before of Hillary. It appears she has a medical body man near her at all times. In Vegas she was getting heckled and the body man rushed to her side on the podium. See picture below

View attachment 10823

In this series of photos you can see him at her side appearing to hold a quick injection device that could be the anti-anxiety-convulsant-seizure drug Diazepam (aka Valium). It would go directly into her bloodstream stopping a seizure quickly.





Who is this mystery man? Why was he so concerned about her being heckled?

Do high stress situations cause him to fear she might have an episode?

If you want to question Trumps psychiatric fitness to be Potus we must also ask objective questions about the physical health of both candidates.

There was a big to do about McCains health and skin cancer history in 2008.

:doh:

It's a flashlight.




You all just got punked. Embarrassing...
 
I heard from a Bernie fan turned Trump fan that it's actually a gun and Hilary is planning a mass shooting because she's the WORST PERSON TO EVER LIVE!!!!11
 
I don't think I've seen more conspiracy theories for a candidate(s) than the Clintons. Obama is up there. Literally every day he's a muslim, atheist, coward, dictator, mastermind, buffoon, liberal, marxist, socialist, capitalist.....etc

but the Clintons, it seems anything gets thrown up and it sticks. Murder, corruption, orgies, drugs, health issues....aliens??? Might as well throw that one out there too.

The Clintons are the reason we haven't found ET. They killed him
 
Well, according to the most recent polls, she doesn't need their votes.

As is also stated in that FiveThirtyEight article:
Before we get to all the data, let’s be clear about what we’re discussing: The Sanders holdouts aren’t that large a group. If they were forced to choose only between Clinton and Trump, the vast majority would choose Clinton and yet they would add only about 1 percentage point to her overall margin over Trump, according to current polls. That could matter in a close election, but the election isn’t looking all that close at the moment.

And it's of course also of relevance to see if those 'lost voters' are concentrated in, say, California, New York or Texas or in states like Ohio, Florida or Georgia.
 
:doh:

It's a flashlight.


You all just got punked. Embarrassing...


You assume all African-Americans on her detail are the same guy?

Ok, no more 'conspiracy theories'. I'm done with the health questions.

How about statistics? All the polls have a bias one way or another. Rasmussen has been decried by some in here for its right leaning bias which is true. Many lean left in sampling. This site has nailed the past 3 election margins of victory in the final week of polling.

Right now they have Trump up by 0.6% in an average of corrected polls.

https://www.longroom.com/polls/


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
You assume all African-Americans on her detail are the same guy?

Ok, no more 'conspiracy theories'. I'm done with the health questions.

How about statistics? All the polls have a bias one way or another. Rasmussen has been decried by some in here for its right leaning bias which is true. Many lean left in sampling. This site has nailed the past 3 election margins of victory in the final week of polling.

Right now they have Trump up by 0.6% in an average of corrected polls.

https://www.longroom.com/polls/


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Doesn't 538 do the same thing, but better?
 
You assume all African-Americans on her detail are the same guy?

Ok, no more 'conspiracy theories'. I'm done with the health questions.

How about statistics? All the polls have a bias one way or another. Rasmussen has been decried by some in here for its right leaning bias which is true. Many lean left in sampling. This site has nailed the past 3 election margins of victory in the final week of polling.

Right now they have Trump up by 0.6% in an average of corrected polls.

https://www.longroom.com/polls/


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

I mean, I can see if the site said "all the polls are wrong and left leaning. Trump is only down by 5-6% instead of 11%", but that site is too far fetched to take seriously.
 
I mean, I can see if the site said "all the polls are wrong and left leaning. Trump is only down by 5-6% instead of 11%", but that site is too far fetched to take seriously.


Aren't you missing the point? If Trump wins, we're dodging a bullet. This country will be saved from a heroin injecting, seizure ridden bitch, that apparently can't handle stress. We'll have a very brave, thick skin, level headed MAN in charge.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
I can't believe how many straws some people are clutching.
 
Well, when they can't say anything positive about their own candidate, they have to try to tear down the opponent.

Seriously, this. Clinton supporters in this thread and previous ones already HAVE discussed her faults and her issues. To death. We actually have acknowledged the problems and issues she does and will face with voters, and the issues she may face if she becomes president.

I honestly would LOVE to hear from those of you supporting Trump in this thread as to why you think he really should be the next president of the United States. Especially given all the recent controversies he's been involved in that have many on the right jumping ship and trying to distance themselves from him. That whole Khan thing did NOT go over well with many conservatives. Criticizing or diminishing the efforts of soldiers and their families is kind of a really bad thing for a presidential candidate to do. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence that they'll be there for those people when a crisis happens, or a loved one dies in battle.

Forget about Hilary for a moment. I want to see his supporters try and discuss/defend/explain away the Khan thing and other recent problems he's had, and talk specifically about Trump and Trump alone in relation to them.
 
Last edited:
In this series of photos you can see him at her side appearing to hold a quick injection device that could be the anti-anxiety-convulsant-seizure drug Diazepam (aka Valium). It would go directly into her bloodstream stopping a seizure quickly.

I really don't want to further this, but have you ever had a seizure (even one stopped by meds)?

Do you realize how totally out of it you are once a seizure starts? Even when it ends, most people will appear totally drugged, or deeply asleep, etc. I used to get them as a child, I remember that feeling very well. You don't just get a shot of diazepam and go on with your day giving speeches and shaking hands. It is just absurd. I feel sorry for anyone who actually needs to hold onto this sort of "hope" for their side.
 
I really don't want to further this, but have you ever had a seizure (even one stopped by meds)?

.

Yes, had one during my sleep as bad reaction to a sleep medication. Bit a gash into the side of my tongue. Don't remember it. From what I understand their are different severity and types of seizures.
 
It now seems that most Americans would vote for the corpse of Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump, so her health concerns don't frighten me. Nor should it the party who put Sarah Palin a 73-year old cancer survivor's heartbeat away from the presidency.
 
Seriously, this. Clinton supporters in this thread and previous ones already HAVE discussed her faults and her issues. To death. We actually have acknowledged the problems and issues she does and will face with voters, and the issues she may face if she becomes president.

I honestly would LOVE to hear from those of you supporting Trump in this thread as to why you think he really should be the next president of the United States. Especially given all the recent controversies he's been involved in that have many on the right jumping ship and trying to distance themselves from him. That whole Khan thing did NOT go over well with many conservatives. Criticizing or diminishing the efforts of soldiers and their families is kind of a really bad thing for a presidential candidate to do. Doesn't exactly inspire confidence that they'll be there for those people when a crisis happens, or a loved one dies in battle.

Forget about Hilary for a moment. I want to see his supporters try and discuss/defend/explain away the Khan thing and other recent problems he's had, and talk specifically about Trump and Trump alone in relation to them.

If you scroll back through the history of these threads you can find some of the Pro-Trump arguments I have made. A flawed guy . . . sure. But I align with his stances. Even bucking some of those 'so-called Conservatives' who have called him out. I think some politicians in the GOP flock are showing their true colors, by not wanting to have their own apple-carts overturned by the Trumpian uprising. Makes me realize how so many in DC have sold out the American people. The same sell-out sentiment runs in Bernie crowd (not saying they are flocking to Trump).
 
Yes, had one during my sleep as bad reaction to a sleep medication. Bit a gash into the side of my tongue. Don't remember it. From what I understand their are different severity and types of seizures.


None of which could ever be hidden and prevented mid-speech by an auto-injector (which would be intramuscular in the first place, and therefore not "directly into the blood stream" anyway) wielding bodyguard. Holy fuck is this conspiracy idiotic.
 
None of which could ever be hidden and prevented mid-speech by an auto-injector (which would be intramuscular in the first place, and therefore not "directly into the blood stream" anyway) wielding bodyguard. Holy fuck is this conspiracy idiotic.


You and anitram bringing actual medical knowledge and experience into the discussion. You must be Clinton plants. This thread is rigged!1!1!!


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
If you scroll back through the history of these threads you can find some of the Pro-Trump arguments I have made. A flawed guy . . . sure. But I align with his stances. Even bucking some of those 'so-called Conservatives' who have called him out. I think some politicians in the GOP flock are showing their true colors, by not wanting to have their own apple-carts overturned by the Trumpian uprising. Makes me realize how so many in DC have sold out the American people. The same sell-out sentiment runs in Bernie crowd (not saying they are flocking to Trump).


You really can't write "so-called conservatives" as if Trump is the definition of principled conservatism. He's not, and you'd be a fool to try and make that argument.

One thing Trump did was shine the light on that whole myth. Stewart's destroying of Hannity was a perfect example.

This really is about the cluster that is the Republican Party; you have true conservatives, you have neo-cons, you have just party loyalists, and you have those Tea Party imbeciles that you all embraced. Sure there is some cross over, but Trump just showed the entire world that at the end of the day there is no underlining foundation anymore other than the R. So you might think you won something for the "anti-establishment" movement, but that's not reality.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Isn't he basically just a nobody who will struggle to get on the ballot in even half the states and snare approximately four votes?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom