Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
Yeah I get it, you don't like BMP. There is such a thing as ignoring him.
Why? He loves it. And that's what we do in here.
I have to say, I normally love your posts. I hope you keep posting.
Yeah I get it, you don't like BMP. There is such a thing as ignoring him.
I think the biggest frustration is the certain very vocal subset of supporters, unfortunately BMP seems to represent this subset(though maybe to an extreme), if there were other more engaging supporters you probably wouldn't have that lumping in here.
It's amazing to me that in a country with such a disturbing problem of limited voter turnout and political involvement, that some of you would be so seethingly angry about a candidate like Bernie garnering some enthusiasm.
Thank you, and this is what I'm getting at: the reactions to BMP have obscured or prevented discussion of what are (I think at least) some legitimate political grievances represented by the larger Bernie campaign. And that's a shame.
And full disclosure, I'm a Hillary supporter, if not a super enthusiastic one. I worry that the demonization of Hillary by Bernie supporters is going the other way as well, making for a counterproductive situation on the national stage.
Thank you, and this is what I'm getting at: the reactions to BMP have obscured or prevented discussion of what are (I think at least) some legitimate political grievances represented by the larger Bernie campaign. And that's a shame.
And full disclosure, I'm a Hillary supporter, if not a super enthusiastic one. I worry that the demonization of Hillary by Bernie supporters is going the other way as well, making for a counterproductive situation on the national stage.
Who is seethingly angry?
The meltdown amongst the fringe Bernie supporters is amusing.
Um, final sale?
[TWEET]752890322208915458[/TWEET]
Unfollowing him. Sick burn.
[TWEET]752888562211692544[/TWEET]
I'm curious as to what these types of folks wanted/expected Bernie to do at this point.
The voters were stating a policy position of Sanders and were three times as likely to name one for him than Clinton supporters were for their candidate. What's so hard to understand about that?
Are you honestly going to argue that the 80 year-olds living on a farm voting for Clinton or black females in Chicago's south side that barely graduated high school know more about politics than the young people of America today, the most educated generation in American history?
A famous name can get you far. See: Trump and Bush, W.
Are you honestly going to argue that a bunch of sheltered white 19-year old college sophomores in flat, white states who know nothing about the world or how it works or have ever earned a paycheck or taken care of a child or suffered any form of hardship in their lives are going to know about the world and how it works than a middle class black female with a decent job and three kids living in the suburbs?
That's a lotta divorces on one ticket.
It's the ticket the party of family values can be proud of
tell you a little secret: they never really have. There are no Christian purity voters. There are those that grew up in the political version of conservative religion and then there are Christians that know how to still separate church from state.I don't think the Christian purity voters care this go-a-round.
It's the ticket the party of family values can be proud of
Yup. Gingrich and FNC have suspended their contract. Makes sense for Trump. Bring forth the old 90s warrior to do battle with the Clintons again. Gingrich translates Trumps message in a more articulate way to hit those GOP that are still lukewarm.
(Off topic since the Castro name popped in my head. I was watching JFK on Amazon prime for the zillionith time and I still can't get over that Fidel is still alive)
Perhaps this will elevate him to 210, 220 electoral votes.