2016 US Presidential Election Pt. IV

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I would urge all the voters of America to vote for Hillary even if she is on life support while having her staff sending blueprints of nuclear missiles to Iran through her private mail account over any of the batshit crazies the GOP currently has in the running.
 
I would urge all the voters of America to vote for Hillary even if she is on life support while having her staff sending blueprints of nuclear missiles to Iran through her private mail account over any of the batshit crazies the GOP currently has in the running.

:lol:

Except it's not even a joke.
 
Seriously? Based on what? Were there not several reports that O'Malley's staffer was in the only nearby women's washroom, thus forcing Hillary to go to the one further away? What do YOU think she was doing during this time? Shooting up with heparin backstage to keep the clots away?


When all else fails; believe in the most far fetched theory. Bathroom breaks are just far too uncommon to have been the reason for running late.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
I'm just standing by my prediction that she will drop out.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference


Right, but can't you understand our point that it's not really based on anything? It just seems more like a want than a prediction; it just looks like you're throwing shit and hoping something sticks.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Considering Reagan's age and any possible health issues he may have had as a result of that when he was president don't seem to affect the GOP's long-standing high opinion of him, I'm thinking we can give Hilary a similar pass on the age/health thing.
Couple of things wrong with this
Many people believe Reagan was not lucid his last few years in office
Reagan was much stronger going in,
do you think Hillary can pull though a Hinkley like assassination attemped?
 
I know a lot of people said that about Reagan in his final years, but my point is that he still entered office at a fairly late age, and the GOP doesn't seem to be bothered about that fact, and they still praise Reagan's presidency as a whole even with those last few years in general.

So the fact that people on the right are suddenly "so concerned" about Hilary's age and health in regards to her ability to be president is a little odd to me. Fact is, she still looks pretty active and healthy in general to me, so...:shrug:.

I honestly don't know how to answer your assassination attempt question, either, because there's lots of factors to consider in those situations. The victim's age and general health would probably be the least of my concerns in that moment.
 
Last edited:
Isn't the Donald older than Hillary?

Though admittedly he's lived a life of leisure and wealth so will probably make it to 100.
 
So far the 2016 race has proven that the two party system is broken and needs to be blown up. It was never intended to be a two party system. It just worked out that way. It needs to die.

The Republicans are split. The democrats are split. Why fight it? Bust the fucker's into pieces.


Then we need a proportional representation system, which will never happen as it's truly one of the only issues that both parties agree on.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Isn't the Donald older than Hillary?

Though admittedly he's lived a life of leisure and wealth so will probably make it to 100.

Donald is in perfect health according to his doctor. Haha


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference


TRUMP! Born: June 14, 1946 (age 69)

HILLARY! Born: October 26, 1947 (age 68)

FEEL THE BERN! Born: September 8, 1941 (age 74)

Honestly i think they are all probably too old to be president. 70 seems like a good age to retire and hope for the best health-wise and financially. Running for office at or near that age has got to be brutal for all involved, not to mention the stress of the job itself. Just look at the before and after photos of the previous two occupants as well as the current one. I remember when McCain was running people were very worried about his age, of course, the main reason for that might have been his VP pick. :D
 
captain-obvious3.jpg
 
Then we need a proportional representation system, which will never happen as it's truly one of the only issues that both parties agree on.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference

Not having a third or fourth or even fifth and sixth party in the House is a phenomenon of the last 100 years or so.

It was never the intention of the founding fathers to have a 2 party system. It just kinda happened that way.

It can be done. Apathy and a money have prevented it from happening. That's where someone like Bloomberg can come in, but he's only getting into the race if he knows he can win (meaning Sanders starts to run away with things).

As long as Clinton remains the likely choice, Bloomberg will stay out.
 
Where are these magical polls? Is this the same place that had 25% of black voters polling for Trump? :lol:

All you have to do is go to RealClearPolitics and scroll down through the latest polls. At least three firms have done the Sanders vs. Clinton comparison recently and they all have ended up with a similar result where Sanders blows the GOP opponents out of the water while Clinton struggles keeping afloat against people like Rubio.

It's not magic. Sanders is the only person running with a positive favorability rating from the American people. His trustworthiness clearly speaks volumes to independent voters.
 
It's not magic. Sanders is the only person running with a positive favorability rating from the American people. His trustworthiness clearly speaks volumes to independent voters.


he's also pretty much unknown to most of the American people outside of Vermont, New Hampshire, and Iowa. (you can thank, in part, the DNC).
 
All you have to do is go to RealClearPolitics and scroll down through the latest polls. At least three firms have done the Sanders vs. Clinton comparison recently and they all have ended up with a similar result where Sanders blows the GOP opponents out of the water while Clinton struggles keeping afloat against people like Rubio.


I scrolled through your link, I saw a bunch of primary polls; Clinton beat out Sanders in most except Fox(wonder why that is?). I haven't seen any Sanders vs Republicans or Clinton vs Republicans in that link, so I'm not sure where you're getting this?


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
Bold prediction: Rand Paul has a top 3 finish in Iowa.
Kasich comes in either first or second in NH.


Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
 
he's also pretty much unknown to most of the American people outside of Vermont, New Hampshire, and Iowa. (you can thank, in part, the DNC).

Yea exactly

Anyone who thinks a socialist candidate is going doing to cruise to the presidency is kidding themselves.

The GOP will have every baby boomer and resident of middle America thinking he's a communist. And it'll work. Because Merica.

And like it or not, those are the people who vote. The huge support amongst young people that Sanders has? Yea. Good luck with that.

All it needs to do is work in, like, 5 states and the GOP will win the presidency, which would be uuuge.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom