But most of all, DETAILS DONALD. He's way too vague on the details for me to support him. He needs to answer the questions directly and not divert it back to him and his money.
He's going to make America great again. What more do you need?
But most of all, DETAILS DONALD. He's way too vague on the details for me to support him. He needs to answer the questions directly and not divert it back to him and his money.
Trump strikes a nerve because GOP voters are fed up with DC leadership mainly cry-baby Boehner and the Turtle McConnell. Boehner may actually get booted as speaker. The voters want more fight from their leaders. Right now Trump is filling that vaccum.
They're not looking for a candidate who can win at policy trivial pursuit. Some envision trump will build and evolve policy over the next year. Others hope the same with Carson. He has that softer talk therapist remedy but is short on policy.
If these two begin to stumble or fade I predict Cruz to rise. He was the most hated republican by the GOP establishment so he has that outsider cred. I know many here think is batshit crazy but he is the most eloquent speaker of the bunch and is well versed in policy.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Since they don't have to wade through a sea of stupidity, that's a much more reasonable date.
I despise Rand Paul. How did someone with a degree of respectability like Ron Paul spawn such a dipshit sellout?
Of course Kasich, the only one that resembles a human being, is getting overlooked. Maybe if he walked around in clown shoes he'd have a fighting chance.
Dude absolutely kills it, from an objective perspective.
The liberalism and incompetence of the Obama administration have pushed us to the edge of a socialist abyss.
I find it strange that you'd quote the exact part where I say "from an objective perspective." Almost like, you acknowledged that, but still ignored it.
His criticism and irrational view of the Obama administration is his own assertion of subjectivity. And it doesn't have much to do with the overall point of the article.
Just because you don't like someone, doesn't mean you can't tip your hat to them. I don't like him. But, did you read the whole thing?
But this is no laughing matter. Our country is slipping away. The liberalism and incompetence of the Obama administration have pushed us to the edge of a socialist abyss.
...
I'm the Ivy League educated son of immigrants. Liberals hate me for that because instead of joining their ranks, I'm a gun-owning, God-fearing conservative who's made a career of beating Democrats. They're now an endangered species in Louisiana. As are bureaucrats -- I've laid off more of them than Trump has fired people and I've cut my state's budget by more than he's worth.
I read the whole thing. The only portion of that piece where I might agree that with your "objective perspective" is in his assessment of Trump's character. But the doomsday scenarios he's providing around Trump are just silly politicking and a plea for attention masquerading as taking a stand.
Note how liberalism is defined as inherently bad (if not downright evil), Obama's incompetence is stated as if it is absolute fact so plain it doesn't even require the faintest hint of actual evidence, and liberals are implicitly equated with gun fearing, God-hating weaklings who are destroying this country. That's not objective perspective. That's fear mongering, of perhaps a slightly less obtuse form than Trump employs, but fear-mongering all the same.
Because Ron Paul ������
No but seriously, I agree. Rand Paul got all the batshit crazy from Ron, but left the integrity at home.
In other news, I've really disliked Bobby Jindal since the whole Duck Dynasty fiasco... but has anyone read his Op-Ed for CNN on Trump? Dude absolutely kills it, from an objective perspective. I didn't know he was capable of such articulation. I was impressed (even though I still strongly disagree with Jindalism).
Jindal: Donald Trump is a madman who must be stopped - CNN.com
We do need to Make America Great Again. We do need to burn down Washington. We do need to eradicate political correctness. But we will not achieve that by nominating a walking punch line.
We face a choice: We can decide to win, or we can be the biggest fools in history and put our faith not in our principles, but in an egomaniac who has no principles. It's time for Trump to take the ride down his own elevator. It's time we rally behind a serious candidate.
I'm the Ivy League educated son of immigrants. Liberals hate me for that because instead of joining their ranks, I'm a gun-owning, God-fearing conservative who's made a career of beating Democrats. They're now an endangered species in Louisiana. As are bureaucrats -- I've laid off more of them than Trump has fired people and I've cut my state's budget by more than he's worth.
If you want to stick it to the man so badly that you are willing to see Clinton win, vote for Trump. But if you want a politically incorrect conservative revolution, I'm the guy who can lead it.
because I don't write off Trump and his followers, some people in here think I am all in for him.
Here is an off-topic question that parallels Trump vs Gop establishment. Do you think the Democratic establishment will do whatever it takes to prevent Sanders from getting the nomination?
The democrat primary is different in that Super-delegates get leverage in picking the nomination. I would think they would side more with Clinton or Biden.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
Just because you don't like someone, doesn't mean you can't tip your hat to them. I don't like him. But, did you read the whole thing?
I did read the whole thing and I didn't find it particularly objective - to me it is nothing I haven't read a hundred times before. Now maybe you can say that he's standing alone in the GOP field in being willing to put pen to paper but generally speaking it's just a pretty histrionic article.