2008 U.S. Presidential Campaign Discussion Thread-Part 10.

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Rush Limbaugh Says Angry Blacks Are In 30 Year Plot To Train Black Children as Militants | Crooks and Liars

We thought that it was just liberal welfare policies and all that that kept blacks from progressing while other minorities grew and prospered, but no, it is these wackos from Bill Ayers to Jeremiah Wright to other anti-American Afrocentric black liberation theologists with ACORN, and Barack Obama is smack dab in the middle of it, they have been training young black kids to hate, hate, hate this country, and they trained their parents before that to hate, hate, hate this country. It was a movement. It was a Bill Ayers, anti-capitalist, anti-American educational movement. ACORN is how it was implemented, right under our noses.
It has been a movement, it has been a religion, and Obama and Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers were all up to their big ears in it.

Thankfully, the only people that take anything Limp Limbaugh says seriously, are the other paranoid, far right, wackos. I've never heard of an independent or moderate voter that have any bit of respect for the asshole.
 
Rush has gone off the deep end, he's been heading that way for a long time. He used to be just a fat overpaid bigot, not he's a slightly slimmer-really overpaid-paranoid everything's a conspiracy-I no longer bother with facts-hypocritical bigot. Maybe it was the drugs...

They'll be a special place in hell for his kind...
 
Rush has gone off the deep end, he's been heading that way for a long time. He used to be just a fat overpaid bigot, not he's a slightly slimmer-really overpaid-paranoid everything's a conspiracy-I no longer bother with facts-hypocritical bigot. Maybe it was the drugs...

They'll be a special place in hell for his kind...

He's lost weight? I couldn't tell. :hmm: Don't take Viagra without a prescription, kids!
 
Why didn't you mention the real author of that "email"? He's certainly not your friend, I imagine.

To The Point News - WHAT VOTERS NEED TO KNOW

Steve Baldwin (no, not that Baldwin), former Executive Director of the Council for National Policy. A secretive group forum that was formed in 1981 by Tim LaHaye as a networking tool for leading US conservative political leaders, financiers and religious right activist leaders. The group, which meets three times a year, promotes "Educational conferences for national leaders in the fields of business, government, religion and academia to explore national policy alternatives."

Believing everything you see on YouTube without question, lying about your sources, defending the undefendable...

:tsk: You've gone off the deep end my friend. Take a vacation, spend some time with your family, and don't read a word of your conspiracy literature... then come back and say hi after Nov 4th. You'll thank me.
 
Looks like O has this election wrapped up and I said as much even after the GOP Convention-check my post history and you will see.

That said here are a lot of reasons why many Americans are genuinely concerened:

Here is what American voters need to know.

(This email was sent to me from someone deep on the inside.)

And remember after it all hits the fan, I tried to warn you here first.

Love,
<>

What if I sent out an e-mail with all of the evidence compiled from the Rolling Stone article on McCain? What if I sent out an e-mail saying things like, "if Barack Obama was the man with the messy divorce, would things be different?" What if I added a lot of bullshit and propaganda into it, and you happened to receive that e-mail?

Would that really warrant "warning" everyone here about it?
 
Don't take Viagra without a prescription, kids!


see, i was always more confused as to why Rush had Viagra when he wasn't married at the time!

i mean, Rush certainly believes in abstinence, like Ms. Sarah Palin, so i can't imagine he'd be so hypocritical and actually have sexual intercourse outside the sacred bonds of holy matrimony. i mean, that would be like saying that occasional pot smokers should be locked up while one was themselves addicted to another controlled substance. can you imagine! :happy:

and one certainly doesn't need Viagra if one isn't married, certainly not when returning from the DR which has apparently a booming underaged sex trade.
 
see, i was always more confused as to why Rush had Viagra when he wasn't married at the time!

i mean, Rush certainly believes in abstinence, like Ms. Sarah Palin, so i can't imagine he'd be so hypocritical and actually have sexual intercourse outside the sacred bonds of holy matrimony. i mean, that would be like saying that occasional pot smokers should be locked up while one was themselves addicted to another controlled substance. can you imagine! :happy:

and one certainly doesn't need Viagra if one isn't married, certainly not when returning from the DR which has apparently a booming underaged sex trade.

Hey, now. The only pre-marital sex that really works up these fine folks is that of Democrats and gay people, which, in their minds, is the same thing.:up:
 
see, i was always more confused as to why Rush had Viagra when he wasn't married at the time!

[snip]

and one certainly doesn't need Viagra if one isn't married,

We have a nutty doctor in town who not only refuses to dispense birth control pills, he also refuses to prescribe Viagra to non-married men. Good thing he wasn't Rush's doctor, eh?
 
Oh, lots.

George Washington was rumored to have been seen dancing naked around on a bonfire with some witches.
Adams was accused of having close ties with terrorists marauding bands of Native Americans.
Voter registration groups were accused of submitting registration information for voters such as "Pocahontas" and "The King of England."


:lmao::lmao:

verrrry good! :up:
 
If this has been covered recently (like earlier in this thread or the previous one) I apologize.

I heard on the radio (at least from 2 sources) the volunteers doing Voter Registration that--
once a potential Voter writes anything down on the Registration card-- a wacky name etc, they still must turn it in.
It gets put in with the (other kinds of) Problem Pile to be checked on.
 
Looks like it's time for the republicans to pull out all the stops.

Muslim DVD rattles voters in key battleground states

On a Sunday morning just weeks before the presidential election, Priscilla Linsley opened her local Denver newspaper and discovered a DVD inside.

"I was shocked at the content and horrified that this had been in my Sunday paper," said Linsley, a 74-year-old Democrat, who watched about half of the video before throwing it in the trash.

"I have Muslim friends and respect Islam as a religion and felt that this was really hateful," said Linsley.

The hourlong film on DVD, "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West," was made by Israeli filmmaker Raphael Shore and shows disturbing, sometimes violent images.

Rima Barakat Sinclair, who is Muslim and a Republican, was so angry she called her local lawmakers in Denver. Video Watch voters reaction to the DVD »

"It is riddled not only with misleading facts but outright fabrication," said Barakat Sinclair.

In September, some 28 million of the "Obsession" DVD's were distributed as advertising inserts in 70 newspapers, primarily in critical swing states such as Colorado, Florida and Ohio.

It was paid for by the Clarion Fund, a nonprofit group established by the film's Israeli producer with the goal of exposing what it calls the threat of radical Islam. The Clarion Fund was created in 2006, the same year "Obsession" was released.

"Our focus is to educate with our movies and raise awareness, not influence elections," said Gregory Ross, a Clarion spokesman.

But Larry Sabato, a political observer and director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, said it's naïve to think such a video won't influence undecided voters.

"It's pretty obvious that the group sponsoring it wants people to think more about terrorism, about national security, about Middle East politics and maybe less about the economy," said Sabato. "Well, that obviously favors one side -- the Republicans."

Because a number of Americans still believe, incorrectly, that Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim, political observers said they believe the DVD plays directly into that misperception.

Clarion said neither the campaign of GOP candidate Sen. John McCain or of Obama had anything to do with the DVD that has outraged some Muslim groups. Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American Islamic Relations, called the film anti-Muslim and politically motivated. Holding up promotional material that came with the video, Awad pointed out, "It says clearly that, 'It's our responsibility to ensure that we can all make an informed vote in November.' "

The rest is here
 
I don't know. Haven't we had a few posters here in FYM take him seriously enough to refer to him as a source? :hmm:

Oh please do name names. Do not be so coy! I mean with such generalizations, one might think you were referring to them.

Sorry for asking for specifics, I know it is hard.:applaud:
 
I am really trying to listen to both sides with an open mind, and McCain is seemingly holding his own (considering his last debate),
well, both are.
But it's really bothering me how McCain is so condesending and smart-assed.
You can also tell it's very hard for him to keep his composure.
He has def twisted so much shit around... and even when Obama sitting right there, refutes and/or explains,
he still insists on telling the American public what he believes is facts.

I wish I could punch his smirky face.

Sorry for the violence, :reject: but he just reminds me of someone.
 
But do we need to refer to anyone as "that kid"?
Agreed, that was condescending.

Posters drop in and out a lot around here, especially during election season. That may or may not be the reason in his case, but I think anyone who mentally keeps tabs on who hangs out here will have noticed that a lot of prior regulars (from all points on the political spectrum) appear to have lost interest in discussing the election months ago.
 
Last edited:
Is that really necessary?

I thought it was, since the statement would imply that the conservatives in the forum all have embraced Rush, yeah, I wanted to know who we were referring too.

Not everyone who thinks like a conservative finds Rush appealing. Just as I am sure not every liberal agrees with some of the more left leaning pundits.

But, I would also point out that even Rush can be right on an issue once in a while, so to say Conservatives in this forum are supportive of Rush, or imply that there is something wrong with someone because they quoted him on an issue that he may very well have made a decent point to me is silly.

Thanks Bonovox and Martha for clarifying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom