11 states vote on gay marriage - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-03-2004, 12:01 PM   #1
War Child
MaxFisher's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 776
Local Time: 06:53 PM
11 states vote on gay marriage

This is one part of yesterday's election that has not been mentioned yet in FYM. (to my knowledge)

What are people's thoughts regarding all 11 states voting to add an amendment to ban gay marriage?

MaxFisher is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:03 PM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
DrTeeth's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Q continuum
Posts: 4,770
Local Time: 08:53 PM

Don't get me started

DrTeeth is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:04 PM   #3
New Yorker
Sherry Darling's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,857
Local Time: 02:53 PM

If you don't think gay marriage is okay...don't get married to someone of the same sex.


PS Melon, if you're out there anywhere,
Sherry Darling is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:23 PM   #4
Blue Crack Supplier
BVS's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,146
Local Time: 01:53 PM
It's been mentioned and it's a sad day for America...one closer step to fundamentalism.
BVS is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:26 PM   #5
Blue Crack Addict
joyfulgirl's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 16,649
Local Time: 11:53 AM
Originally posted by DrTeeth
Don't get me started
That’s what I was going to say.
joyfulgirl is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:30 PM   #6
The Flower
BAW's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The OC....!!!!
Posts: 11,094
Local Time: 10:53 AM

(that's how I feel about it)
BAW is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:33 PM   #7
War Child
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ann arbor mi
Posts: 935
Local Time: 02:53 PM
I feel so mixed on this issue...I mean, I voted 'no' on the MI proposal and would vote "no" on any proposal to discriminate against people based on whom they love, but at the same time I feel like the state shouldn't be in the business of doing anything but creating legal arrangements between people anyway.
The State, and the states, should be giving us *all* civil unions, gay straight whatever, and "marriages" are for individual religious groups to confer.
to define marriage is just not any government's business, imho. I guess given that they play the game with heterosexual couples, it's only fair that they do it with homosexual couples, but what else can they legislate...that couples submit to 'therapy' sessions to try and save the 'union' before a divorce is granted, etc?
It's all crap, for a government to get into any aspect of a relationship but the legal aspects, and I surely would have no problem trading in marriage licenses for civil union licenses all around. prefer it actually.

that said, I think that at least some of the folks who voted in favor of reserving the term 'marriage' for a union between a man and a woman were making a semantic commitment and would still be for civil union, but maybe only some. I think if they are asked about whether gay couples should have this that and the other rights they might change their tune, but there is something that causes bristling when deep semantic commitments are challenged, and that might be getting touched off with that issue unfortunately.
ShellBeThere is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:38 PM   #8
Blue Crack Addict
Liesje's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 19,563
Local Time: 02:53 PM
Originally posted by ShellBeThere
I voted 'no' on the MI proposal and would vote "no" on any proposal to discriminate against people based on whom they love
Same here, voted NO.
Liesje is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:41 PM   #9
Blue Crack Addict
Doozer61's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Setting up house on Scooter's Star
Posts: 20,218
Local Time: 10:53 AM
Originally posted by Bono's American Wife

(that's how I feel about it)

me too, sister!
Doozer61 is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 12:52 PM   #10
pianorocker's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: the cosmos
Posts: 339
Local Time: 01:53 PM

Tis a sad day for me. I thought more people understood how extreme Ohio's one was, but I was wrong.
pianorocker is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 01:12 PM   #11
Rock n' Roll Doggie
speedracer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,604
Local Time: 02:53 PM
Face it, people don't want to give official sanction or tax breaks to gay couples, threesomes, unmarried cohabiting couples, or incestuous couples. The people have spoken.

(I say this as someone who would have voted to legalize gay marriage or some legal approximation thereof in my state, were it to be put to the vote.)
speedracer is offline  
Old 11-03-2004, 03:31 PM   #12
MacPhisto's serving wench
The_Sweetest_Thing's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Inside a bubble
Posts: 3,773
Local Time: 01:53 PM
again minority groups are discriminated against. why do we feel continuously surprised even though deep down, we knew this would happen? why do we always hol dout some hope for the good of humanity??
The_Sweetest_Thing is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:04 AM   #13
Anthony's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,538
Local Time: 06:53 PM
Yes, this is one particular result of the election that made me very sad.


Razors pain you; Rivers are damp;
Acids stain you; And drugs cause cramp.
Guns aren't lawful; Nooses give;
Gas smells awful; You might as well live.

Dorothy Parker, 'Resumé'
Anthony is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:10 AM   #14
U2Traveller's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 472
Local Time: 11:53 AM
I don't know. It's such a hard issue.

I am LDS, and I believe being homosexual is a sin. BUT, most religious people are NOT bigots. I'm not a bigot, and I, in a way, think it's wrong that this issue was brought up. In a way, it makes me very sad.

This is also why I'm proud to be Utahn, because unlike all the other states, more Utahns voted for Bush than voted for this amendment. Therefore, it shows that many Utahns were thinking twice about this, uncomfortable with it, and still are, even the ones who voted for it. We don't think it was necessary or necessarily right.

I think a lot of people just didn't really know what to do. They knew it was important, but, really, didn't know how to go about it, whether to vote or not.

I know my mom asked me what I thought about it, if we should vote yes. We may believe homosexuality is a sin, but we are good people and are not bigots, and we really didn't know what this really implied. So, I think a lot of Utahns just went with what they believe, but malice is not in their hearts.

Still, it's not over. We'll get it all straightened out in the end.
U2Traveller is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:14 AM   #15
Rock n' Roll Doggie
dandy's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: styrofoam peanut commune
Posts: 4,310
Local Time: 03:53 PM

there are so many pressing issues that deserve our attention, and this is not one of them. the state should stay out of people's private lives rather than discriminate against and exclude people who they deem to be *different*. we're all just human beings who want to find love and be happy, and the state has no business trying to regulate this.

dandy is offline  

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com