It's Officialy Interferencers Against Acronyms

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Headache in a Suitcase

Site Team
Staff member
Joined
Jul 16, 2000
Messages
75,763
Location
With the other morally corrupt bootlicking rubes.
There's been a lot of posts lately... maybe... maybe too many posts...

yuk yuk yuk


... about how many people hate these acronym/abbreviations for U2 songs/albums...

for example...

WTSHNN, ISHFWILF, ATYCLB, SYCMIOYO, HTDAAB... Hut-Dab:barf:

Well I've had enough... join me in my new organization... Interferencers Against Acronyms.

To join, all you need to do is simply add "Interferencers Against Acronyms" to your signiture, then simply not use any U2 Acronyms. Quite easy, actually.

So who's with me? Eh? Eh?

:reject:
 
Headache in a Suitcase said:
To join, all you need to do is simply add "Interferencers Against Acronyms" to your signiture, then simply not use any U2 Acronyms.

That's way too long, couldn't I just use IAA instead?
 
I like the acronyms. They're like some kind of weird little puzzles to figure out.

But yeah, Hut-Dab is out of line. People at least need to stick with real acronyms. And some restraint is in order - SIAMYCGOO is stupid. Just write "Stuck" people, it's shorter anyway.
 
Headache in a Suitcase said:
Well I've had enough... join me in my new organization... Interferencers Against Acronyms.

How about "Real Interferencers Against Acronyms"? That would translate to RIAA and I think the RIAA could have a lot of power. :wink:

LOL!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom