Sicy said:
Is there a thread that you DONT mention how much you hate POP? Fine fine fine that's your opinion great but hearing the same thing come out of the same person's mouth in every damn thread they post in is seriously getting old and STARTS FIGHTS!
But there's a BIG difference here.
I fully acquiesce that One Tree Still is entitled to his opinion, even though I feel he is horribly wrong.
Analogously, GypsyHeartGirl is entitled to her opinion, even though I feel she is wrong as well. The difference though is that while Gypsy may mention her dislike more often (O.K., a LOT more often
), she has never created a thread (to the best of my memory) for the sheer purpose of debasing "Pop." In contrast, One Tree Still did create a thread for the sole purpose of disparaging ATYCLB.
And this was Gypsy's point. We all know she doesn't like "Pop" as she has hardly kept this secret. But how would we react if she then posted a thread stating how it "sucks"? This is what is differentiating the two ideas. That is, is this thread really necessary, and if so, could it not have been titled differently?
As for Gypsy's discussion of "attacks" - are they any different from what KhanadaRhodes posted when she wrote this:
i am getting goddamned sick of all these trolls coming in to disagree with a blatantly ANTI-ATYCLB THREAD! if you like the album and want to have its manbabies, start your own damn thread. this is getting quite old.
Based on Khanada's words, perhaps Gypsy should create a thread bashing "Pop."
Also...
The Wanderer said:
and there's nothing left to discover there, unlike Zooropa/ Pop where the songs were layered and more difficult to digest, whereas on ATYCLB the songs are a bit thin and have long since been exposed to the bone
For me, this is the exact opposite. One reason I am not such a fan of JT is that the songs now sound horribly dated and simple. Sure, there are some brilliant stand-outs, but for the album overall, there are some songs that I still skip over to this day.
In a similar fashion, not long ago I listened to "Pop" several times over the course of a few days. The first time I heard it, I was flooded with memories of 1997, when the album was released. I had fun and enjoyed it. But upon the second listening, I found the album full of holes. The lyrics and music were horribly weak at times. That album also had a more dated feeling to it. Now, I don't agree with Gypsy in that the album is horrible, but I do admit it needs work. In contrast, every time I listen to ATYCLB, I hear something new. It could be a new sound. Or a new way to interpret a lyric. But the songs seem so pure and fresh that I find it nearly impossible to put this album down.
Therefore, it really is a matter of opinion. Most people worship JT, whereas I find it one of U2's weaker moments. Many love the harder edge to "Pop" yet I find it one of their most poorly written and produced albums. Some claim ATYCLB to be over-produced, yet I have felt this way for years about JT and AB (probably AB's biggest weakness). To me, it seems that Eno/Lanois finally pulled back some on ATYCLB to give it a more raw feeling. But does anything I write here really make a difference to someone who doesn't like ATYCLB? Does anything anyone will say change my opinion of JT?
This of course, brings us back to Gypsy's comments. We are here to discuss U2. Some may get flamed a bit for their views, but as long as things are civil - even if someone is redundant - I don't see the need to scold anyone for their opinions or their questions.
Lastly, for the hypocritical comment of the century, we have:
Zoomerang96 said:
bono stop acting like an ass.
Ah, irony at it's most pure.