In 2006, would you rather see U2 touring more or go back into the studio for a fast(er) follow up to the Bomb?
(or, if you're feeling optimistic, how about both?)
I think touring is my choice - I don't think they will skip Mexico and Australia and Japan that were all talked about (they didn't build that big stadium stage just for one leg did they?). Plus U2's albums that take longer are usually better IMO.
(or, if you're feeling optimistic, how about both?)
I think touring is my choice - I don't think they will skip Mexico and Australia and Japan that were all talked about (they didn't build that big stadium stage just for one leg did they?). Plus U2's albums that take longer are usually better IMO.