Salome said:who on earth discusses the longetivity of an album that isn't even half a decade old???
and if you would like to discuss this than at least look at some of the facts we do have - like airplay - and acknowledge that this album is still more popular than Zooropa and POP combined
which is pretty much what U2kitten wrote in here and what I wrote in another thread a while ago
I don't mind people not liking ATYCLB
but I've read so many bullshit reasons on why this album supposedly is so bad (if anyone could explain to me why the lyrics to Elevation would be any worse than those of If God Will Send His Angels ...... well, they'd be wrong! ......... IMO )
so .. yes,
don't like continious bashing
it gets tiring no matter what album it happens with
90's U2 lovers who hate it could just let this album be and let others enjoy it without throwing tantrums all the time. You've made your point, we KNOW you don't like it.
I don't see how "it's too poppy (U2 is just as much WOWY as it is The fly)/safe (U2 was never afraid of being in the mainstream)?)/boring(this one wasn't about experimenting, so this argument doesn't really fly)" suddenly equals "it's a bad album". We still haven't heard a valid reason why it is the most bashed U2 album on this board. Unlike another U2 album we all know, it didn't have problems with selling out venues on tour, it had more hits, better chart success/sales and a bigger appeal to the audience. Not to mention better songs.
It's a really good album IMO, and possibly - in terms of popularity and wide masses appeal - the closest they will get to JT and AB times. It is aging well, and hasn't lost any of its charms.
Last edited: