w.i.l.a.t.w.-which city most deserving?

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
hehe

everyone's entitled to their own opinion

except Ivan cos he is eastern european
smile.gif
 
Originally posted by IvanClaytonJnr:
agree with martha : poor lyrics , poor melody , poor album
wink.gif
smile.gif
VIVA U2's diamonds
biggrin.gif


wait! this is a joke, right? you are just trying to get my blood circulating. maybe you don't like w.i.l.a.t.w.-but to say that this is a poor album. are you sure that you really enjoy u2's style of music/
 
Originally posted by zooropamanda:
Sydney!!!!
I dont even care about which songs, just give us one measley show!!!

St Helens, hah!


I heard that youngster!


------------------
Looking for explanations? Well I don't even understand
 
WILATW is a very good song...would be an EXCELLENT live tune imo...

Im not gonna say which city cos im too pissed at not seeing em at all right now
tongue.gif
 
Originally posted by martha:
None; it's not that great a song.

I agree.

Question should be which city deserves to have MW, WOWY and Fly back on the setlist...

[This message has been edited by Bonoforever (edited 11-04-2001).]
 
Wow, I cant believe so many of you dont like this song?? I think it is great.

Anyway, I highly doudbt it will be played on this tour. I actually predicted that before the tour even started. So I dont think any city will get it. I think U2 have played all the songs off of ATYCLB that they will play live on this tour. The only thing they might do is a full band version of Peace On Earth (they rehearsed this extensively at the South Bend show) and they may add another older tune but no more from ATYCLB IMO.
 
I love the song, and think it would be waaay better live than on the album. on the album it sounds like it's being held back.

But I doubt at this point that it's going to get played.
 
Back
Top Bottom