financeguy said:
U2 and Simple Minds seemed to be equals for a while in the early 80's, but looking back I feel that U2's music from that period has dated a lot better.
One of the problems with how SM music has aged, is alot of it was politically motivated. However unlike U2, it was much more centered around contemporary events.
For example obviously a song like Pride was about Dr King. Which gives it a much more timeless feeling as it wasnt explicitly about the Civil Rights movement, it was about Dr Kings dream which is always a timeless thing. It can still resonate with people today.
A Minds song like "Mandela Day" or "Ghostdancing" centralize around Apartheid. Albeit still being great songs, most young people today aren't as familiar with how horrible the Apartheid Regime was, and it just doesnt resonate with them.
That having been said their early pre-Sparkle In The Rain albums Life In A Day, Real To Real Cacophony, Empires & Dance, Sons & Fascination/Sister Feelings Call, and New Gold Dream have aged quite well. Alot of the credit should go to the phenomenal instrumentations and excellent production.
On a purely technical level, Simple Minds were a much better band than U2. U2's strength lies in the lyrics, and the four members dedication to one another.
If Derek Forbes and Michael MacNeil had never left Simple Minds, I imagine the band would still do reasonably well today. They both offered to rejoin recently, but for some odd reason Jim Kerr never followed up on it.