Should U2 have waited?

[Zoots]

this is the end of YOUR career because you just got one of my threads closed

Hahahahahahahahaha

 

[U2Man]

it was a good thread. a little controversial perhaps, but we could have had some fine discussions in there.

 

[Zoots]

it was a good thread. a little controversial perhaps, but we could have had some fine discussions in there.

I didn't mean to get it closed.

Anyway, you have 2 other threads open on the first page!

 

[U2Man]

I didn't mean to get it closed.

Anyway, you have 2 other threads open on the first page!

It's not my fault that everyone keeps posting in my threads

 

[Infinity]

anyway, like the person said before, the cd was to end the contract with island records (they were signed for 3 GREATEST HITS albums). as for the book

Yea but still, why can't they just release the 3rd greatest hit in 2010 as the "U2 Best of 2000-2010?"

 

[adrball]

Yea but still, why can't they just release the 3rd greatest hit in 2010 as the "U2 Best of 2000-2010?"

i guess they'll probably do that too.

 

[Aygo]

But I have one doubt: does the contract specified 3 greatest hits or it just said it had to be 3 compilations ?

Well, if it was the second option... why U218? Couldn't they have released (physically) a compilation of Rare And Unreleased stuff as they did with i-tunes? I'm sure that a 2 disc compilation of stuff that nobody knew yet from U2 would sell as much as The Best Of 1990-2000.

 

[U2girl]

Yea but still, why can't they just release the 3rd greatest hit in 2010 as the "U2 Best of 2000-2010?"

Because they left Island early?

Besides 2000-2010 Best of is looking weak already: 4 ATYCLB were used for U2:18, as were two Bomb songs.