Please don't censor discussions regarding DATA, ie, Bono and the Gates's

[Doppelgang]

I beleive the question of whether or not Bono and his work with the Gates's or others should be setout a s a logical, philosophical debate.

As such one neeeds to first develop the question, some thing like Is it justified for one to associate with others who may be of questionable repute to forward a justified cuase such as debt releif / aids support?

Next one needs to outline the criteria for argument, ie, the facts.
Proof is needed of the persons'n questions true actions and character to base the measure of repute.

If done correctly and fairly two sides of the argument, pro and con are outlined, discussed and conclusions are thus drawn.

I myself welcome such a discussion.

 

[financeguy]

Sounds more suited to FYM.

 

[indra]

Sounds more suited to FYM.

Agreed.

oh, and Dopplegang, your choice of thread titles won't exactly endear you to the mods, so you might want to re-think it for the future. Think about it -- would you be favourably inclined toward someone who just told you you were taking away their right to free speech (which you don't have on this board anyway, as it is a private entity)?

 

[martha]

the facts.

This was the problem with the previous thread. The poster didn't know shit about what he was talking about.

And there have been plenty of "uncensored" threads about this in FYM.

 

[KhanadaRhodes]

spin-offs

it's not censoring, it's the fact that 1. the thread didn't belong in here, 2. the poster didn't have his facts straight.

basically, what everyone else has said.