To say that U2 were chasing relevancy or whatever and nothing more with Pop is on par with saying U2 are chasing dollars and nothing more with the Bomb. Both are complete bullshit, but you can pull plenty of evidence to defend both.
U2 more often than not have grafted outside influence into their music. It's only slammed when it doesn't work for you. I can't think of a U2 album that doesn't have en element of taking something outside and grafting it onto the U2 foundation. Whether it be in the producer brought in, the music influence of the time, the genre they are trying to ape. I don't know why the crime is suddenly greater with Pop, especially considering the path that led to it from Achtung through Passengers, one that was all too obviously heading to an album somewhere in the very close vicinity of what we got in 1997. Some of you make it sound like U2 started off as The Joshua Tree band in 1978, then suddenly shifted to Pop 20 odd years later. It's ignoring everything that came before the Joshua Tree and everything in between it and Pop entirely. The argument is bunk. They rushed the album and fucked the production, that's the crime of Pop. If you don't like the sound of it, the songs, the attempt, the image etc, that's perfectly fine, but to write it off in part because they were heavily influenced by other music of that era, and to put that down to merely some kind of cash in or "desperate attempt to stay relevant" is simply ignoring every single other time they've done the exact same thing, which is virtually every album.
What the fuck is U2's sound or music? It is as much Out of Control as it is October as it is Sunday Bloody Sunday as it is The Unforgettable Fire as it is Bullet the Blue Sky as it is Angel of Harlem as it is The Fly as it is Lemon as it is Mofo as it is Beautiful Day and as it is now Vertigo. I'm no Bomb fan, can't stand the album, makes me very sad really. I have my reasons, but they do not include something as weak as claiming it as a cash in, radio friendly attempt at relevancy and making a shitload of money off the pop market all as one massive ego sweep to remain the biggest band in the world. U2 are ambitious, always have been. Want to be relevant, always have. Graft other sounds and influences into their core foundation, always have. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Some of us are sometimes fans, some of us are sometimes not.
Isn't this specificaly a Bomb bashing thread anyway? So I can be let loose without fear?