shaun vox
New Yorker
did some one say that "ZooTV tour was weak"
your joking right?????
your joking right?????
Zoocoustic said:
Let me go out on a limb here and say that AB does NOT equal U2 at all and that is why it is their best work.
Typical U2 is:
Trying to save the world.
Trying to appeal to the masses.
Trying to sound "like U2".
With AB they ignored all this and simply put out an album that reflected what they were experiencing at the time...and it sounded like nothing else.
They weren't being U2 and that's why it is so brilliant. They should try not being U2 more often.
shaun vox said:did some one say that "ZooTV tour was weak"
your joking right?????
unnamed_streets said:
Wow, that's true! Enough preaching, Bono. Act like a rock star again circa 1992.
Axver said:
Some of us here admire U2 because they aren't trashy rock stars. Personally, I never want to see a return to the Achtung days. I like my rock band with a conscience.
NoControl said:Then why are you listening to and following them now?
Axver said:
Some of us here admire U2 because they aren't trashy rock stars. Personally, I never want to see a return to the Achtung days. I like my rock band with a conscience.
miss becky said:
And all those on-stage satellite hook-ups with Sarajevo were done by a band *without* a conscience? Puh-lease.
miss becky said:Zoo TV was indeed scripted...one of my favorite Bono quotesf from that era is, "The hardest thing is to make it look spontaneous."
But if you had been able to experience a show, I don't think you would say that it was boring. I saw Zoo TV on the first leg, in Cleveland, March 1992, and I was utterly blown away. I had never seen anything like that in all my life.
And don't forget, the Internet was still incredibly young then. We couldn't compare setlists and the band's actions from night to night. So what seems static now, just wasn't, at the time, simply because you had no way of knowing what Bono had done three nights previously.
Dunno...I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
Axver said:
Those are all fair calls too and I find ZooTV bootlegs to be absolutely astounding, but compared to other tours (expect Popmart), I feel like U2 is hindered by the technology and lacked the spontaneity of earlier tours. I don't understand why they would have wanted to do that.
miss becky said:
From reading U2 Show, it seems that the technology that powered Zoo TV was in its early stages. So it may just have been that they didn't know how to create spontaneity. I mean, Popmart and Elevation were also very scripted...but there was more room for flexibility. I don't know how much of that is due to advances in the technology, however, or how much of that is/was a band decision.
Axver said:
but I don't go to a concert to see fancy effects and wonderful lighting, I go to hear music.
Axver said:
I'm also a bit anti-AB/Zoo because it thoroughly destroyed the Lovetown era that I love so much.
miss becky said:
I have this theory that we love the era the best that represents the time we got into the band.
zooroper said:
Oh Pl-eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease don't star with that lame excuse!
That statement is SO SHALLOW that I don't even wanna comment on that!
Well...looks like all the ZOO TV & PoPMart Fans are into lights, big screens, big lemons & arches & hunged cars.....yea right.
David Bowie - LOOK WHAT YOU HAVE DONE!!! Mr. Bowie - you're such an aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasssssss!
NoControl said:
For the past five years, all that U2 is and has been concerned with is...gouging their fanbase with ever increasing ticket prices, charging $40 U2.com memberships with promises not fulfilled and charging $60 for t-shirts...
U2girl said:
And what did you think when they released an album, a book and a movie in 1988?
Let's not pretend that U2 wasn't interested in making money till 2000.