ClaytonsKitten
ONE love, blood, life
Bono was looking rather fit in St Trop.
....bet he's laid off the pizza.
....bet he's laid off the pizza.
Ah, the PLEBAns and their indicators.Bono was looking rather fit in St Trop.
....bet he's laid off the pizza.
So "best of 2000-2010" with Siren included, so this will be a Siren CD single then.RUMOR ALERT: an insider at universal FRANCE saying the first album set for a november release will be this:
with the unreleased song Siren as a single...
In 2015, a second album, original this time...
To be continued!
Which is why this upcoming album will be the last one, and it will be a double album, followed by the biggest farewell tour in the history of music. Start saving people, there will be LOTS of shows to go to!
[/maybe true, but sarcasm for now]
Ah, the PLEBAns and their indicators.
It's pretty obvious they've struggled with this album, given the fact that, for starters it's taken so long! Then they had so much hype around Invisible and then they have disappeared and basically said nothing except for the usual garbage that the "album is in final mixing" blah blah blah.
Would be nice if they had something official on U2.com with some sort of rough expectation time frame and actual honesty from the band without sugar coating it.
I actually tend to believe this course of action from U2...After 5 years and all this struggle, self-doubt and their other commitments to family and interest, this is most likely their last outing with a big farewell tour which will most likely outsell the 360 TOUR. If the upcoming album is a smash hit or a VERY good one, they will make a nice exit...
Nah. I agree that this may be their last record, but I doubt it's the last tour.
Have you seen the last pictures from Eze?
Rubin is sharing time with Bono?
Speculations?
Nah. I agree that this may be their last record, but I doubt it's the last tour.
Rich dude hangs out with another rich dude in the south of France, rich dudes' paradise.
There was hype around Invisible? It was relevant for maybe a week.
Last album, yes. Most likely. Last tour, maybe not after thinking about it...
They will SURELY do a "reunion" tour or a gig at a massive event in 10-12 years after the tour has ended.
In my view, they have attained "Rolling Stones" territory now...they will keep going like Mick & Co. as long as they can and desire...They will always be able to fill up stadiums and arenas. They are "Legends" now and will still be in 40 years in music history..
Have you seen the last pictures from Eze?
Rubin is sharing time with Bono?
Speculations?
Rubin has been brought on-board to put his "touch" on the Epworth-Tedder produced disc
Cori, this deserves a GIF
I disagree. U2 is in a league all their own. They are unique to "great rock bands" because unlike their counterparts in the likes of the Stones, Who, etc....they still have the ORIGINAL lineup intact and are not simply a "tour" band. They are continuing to write and put out new music. If they WANTED to, they could easily become a "nostalgia" act and simply tour on a greatest hits set whenever they felt like it. And it would sell out. Because not only would the hardcores go, plenty of casuals would too. U2 doesnt want to do that. They want to continue recording and putting out new tracks.
Name ONE other band who has been together for over four decades without a single lineup change, put out albums in all of those decades, and toured with massive success. To quote Bono circa 2005: "Line them up."
This is uncharted territory. We are one of the luckiest fanbases in the world to even be discussing it. Yes, it's frustrating to wait out the news, but at least we've got something worth waiting for.
This a great insight and I do agree with you that they're a league of their own
I didn't mean that I was putting U2 in the same "bag" as their counterparts but in the same "position" that they will be able to tour for many years to come if they wanted to and still sell out their gigs
I disagree. U2 is in a league all their own. They are unique to "great rock bands" because unlike their counterparts in the likes of the Stones, Who, etc....they still have the ORIGINAL lineup intact and are not simply a "tour" band. They are continuing to write and put out new music. If they WANTED to, they could easily become a "nostalgia" act and simply tour on a greatest hits set whenever they felt like it. And it would sell out. Because not only would the hardcores go, plenty of casuals would too. U2 doesnt want to do that. They want to continue recording and putting out new tracks.
Name ONE other band who has been together for over four decades without a single lineup change, put out albums in all of those decades, and toured with massive success. To quote Bono circa 2005: "Line them up."
This is uncharted territory. We are one of the luckiest fanbases in the world to even be discussing it. Yes, it's frustrating to wait out the news, but at least we've got something worth waiting for.
Name ONE other band who has been together for over four decades without a single lineup change, put out albums in all of those decades, and toured with massive success. To quote Bono circa 2005: "Line them up."
Well, there's the first Los Lobos mention in the thread
And the Rush mentions.
And the Rush mentions.