Indisputable fact

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Acoustic normally sucks, especially Desire

But acoustic Walk On is probably the only acoustic version that is better than the original (well maybe Stuck is too)

And that cant be disputed.
 
you only like it because bono makes a fool of himself when he forgets the words. he only does that when they play it acoustically for some odd reason.
 
corianderstem said:
I dispute your so-called "fact."

It's impossible to dispute an indisputable fact, so good luck with that.
 
I really like acoustic Walk on, but full band is great too. They're similar.

The only other good acoustic is Stuck, which blows away the awful full band version.
 
Chizip said:


A performance marred by Tarzan at 0:50 and a rogue leprechaun at some other point. :tsk:


We got an acoustic Walk On in DC, and I was very impressed. I haven't decided if I like one way more than the other, but I will say that it definitely works well acoustically. :yes:
 
Last edited:
I can't, I'm out of cover sheets and little binder thingies, to make it look all professional. :(
 
I'd like it to get the Stuck treatment.

Half acoustic, then the band kicks in.

It really adds something extra and shows all aspects of the song.
 
No. Same goes for the much overhyped acoustic Stuck.

The only acoustic song better than the album version is Staring at the sun.
 
I ALWAYS prefer full band to acoustic, and Walk On is one of my least favourite U2 songs so I'd be quite happy to hear neither version live ever again.
 
Back
Top Bottom