prmdbr said:
This is a decent analysis however, One does climax, specifically in the live versions.
With both the album and the live versions, you don't reach any kind of climax until the very end, as opposed to MJB's version, which skyrockets within the first minute. Moreover, I'd argue that with the album version, any "climax" isn't reached until the falsetto at the very end...and even then, because of the key, it doesn't quite fully feel like a full climax, at least to me.
The Rattle and Hum version of ISHFWILF is full of vocal runs, see Bono, et al.
Actually, Bono doesn't sing a single run in that version. It's all the backing choir. That version is pretty good, though IMO once they get to the second or third repeat of the chorus and add layer upon layer of runs, it gets repetitive. The last minute and a half of that version is boring, IMO.
There just seems to be a negative vibe about this duet yet, no one seems to be able to "critically" explain why they don't like it.
Didn't I just offer my "critical" reasoning in my last post?
That's the real problem that occurs on this board---if someone's argument disagrees with your own views, you don't believe that argument to be sound. Opinions that differ from your own are based on faulty reasoning. If there aren't a half-dozen paragraphs explaining why someone likes or doesn't like something, that person hasn't provided sufficient reason for their opinion. (By the way, by merely saying, "The Bono / Mary J Blige version of One is a fabulous presentation of the song. It transcends simple rock and R&B and showcases a different spin on a classic U2 song. I applaud this," you didn't really offer much more critical reasoning than I did
). In all honesty, people really don't even have to offer any backing for their opinions...they should just be allowed to have them.
I agree, there has been a negative vibe about the MJB version of the song. There are probably a million reasons why different people don't like it. Every single one of those reasons is allowed. I don't think your opinion is 'wrong' at all. The problem I have is when you decided to assume what
other people's reasons were, criticize people for not colorfully illustrating their reasons, and then talking down to us as if we haven't "seen the light" of your wondrous ways of thought.