Great Article About The Best Of 1990-2000

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

namkcuR

ONE love, blood, life
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
10,770
Location
Kettering, Ohio
This article is technically about The Best Of 1990-2000 compilation, but the author(Annie Zaleski) hints big time on how the band has changed in general as well in recent times. A great read!



Underneath U2's patriotic flag-waving and global peacemaking, at heart the four lads still want to be rebellious Irish teenagers. What other explanation is there for what happened to them during the 1990s? During the '80s the band was scrappy and brash, steadfastly ignoring the plastic passion of new wave with politically charged idealism and tilting activism. After conquering most of the free world with "The Joshua Tree" in 1987, the band members fit comfortably into their roles as straight-faced rockers, saving humanity with soaring anthems and bleeding hearts on their sleeves.

Then, in their version of getting a tattoo, staying out all night drinking cheap beer and skipping out of gym class for a smoke, the foursome spent the next decade running away from a reputation. No longer the polite young men you could proudly take home to Mom, their very public descent into irony and weirdness was fascinating to watch. The band released the electro-buzzed "Achtung Baby" (1991) and Bono transmogrified into a debauched devil on the Zoo TV tour. On "Zooropa" (1993) the Edge mumbled the cold "Numb" to a keyboard line borrowed from proto-new wave band the Normals' "Warm Leatherette." And then there was the Popmart extravaganza, a Day-Glo train wreck of synthesizers, larger-than-life Golden Arches and a mechanized lemon -- a sort of experiential version of the kaleidoscopic and commercially sour "Pop" (1997). After the long-haired, doe-eyed earnestness and genuine faith of '80s warhorses like "With or Without You" and "Sunday Bloody Sunday," U2's winking excess and ironic, "Is this a joke?" sensibility were difficult to swallow.

All said, U2's "The Best of 1990-2000" should be less cohesive and a lot harder to digest than its predecessor, "The Best of 1980-1990." The techno-fried tracks on a bonus 13-song disc of B-sides that was packaged with "1990-2000" during the first week of release are certainly patchier. However, the 16 songs included on the single-disc A-sides compilation are surprisingly much tamer than the four full-length albums from which they are plucked. Call it revisionist history or selective remembering, but "1990-2000" has obviously been processed and manipulated through a massive earnestness filter. In a way, this collection exposes an all-new irony: That for all their slick-sell posturing, U2 was pretty serious all along. Or at least that's the intended message.

Instead of "Zooropa's" trance-inducing title track or the hectic urban chaos of "Lemon," we hear the dreamy, tick-tock lullaby of "Stay (Faraway, So Close!)" and a delicate, almost a cappella "The First Time." "Pop" is similarly pruned: The new mix of "Gone" is closer to the band's loose live version, minimizing squealing synths in favor of sparse piano chords and Adam Clayton's bass. "Staring at the Sun," often reworked into an acoustic tune in concert, emphasizes Larry Mullen Jr.'s drums and random dapples of guitar and synth high in its own remix, underscoring its desolate atmosphere. While first-rate compositions, both give little hint of "Pop's" messy bursts of mechanical fireworks.

Of course, some of U2's bizarre artifacts just can't be swept under the rug. The new version of "Pop's" glittery all-night party "Discotheque" -- heavier on the funk -- and a slightly tweaked remix of "Numb" both betray their automaton origins. And you wouldn't want to change a few relics, such as "Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me," their excellent "Batman Forever" soundtrack contribution that oozes lust, pulsing with a jagged riff.

As a whole, "1990-2000" accurately delivers the essence of "Achtung Baby," reproducing its vulnerable declarations of love, erotic dance-floor artifice and doses of decadent seduction. All of that is included here in three songs: the ballad "One," the apocalyptic come-on "Until the End of the World" and the hypersexual "Even Better Than the Real Thing." The goal with the rest of the collection seems to be to amass something as undated, as unembarrassing even, as "Achtung" as a whole.

This likely explains why all three songs from "Pop" appear remixed. Stripped away to chords and lyrics, "Pop" is quite possibly one of U2's most gut-wrenching albums; its cheesy electronics fail to hide the anguish of "Wake Up Dead Man," "Please" and "Mofo." But today it also seems like the musical equivalent of U2's goth phase, the band awkwardly trying out keyboards and vocal distortion like a teenager messing with fishnets, dyed black hair and the Sisters of Mercy.

In retrospect, U2 didn't waver as much as we thought during the Clinton years. For a rock band, they were properly unconventional -- even rebellious. Just as grunge rock began to grumble with angst, Bono stretched into the top of his vocal range on "Ultraviolet (Light My Way)." Later, their spate of "Achtung"/"Zooropa" remixes predated the short-lived electronica boomlet in the States by almost five years. And then, when boy band and Britney fluff infested the pop charts with disposable confections, U2 arrived with "All That You Can't Leave Behind," a no-frills rock celebration of guitars, bass, drums and vocals.

Oddly enough, there are only two tracks -- "Beautiful Day" and "Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of" -- from "Behind," both trumpeted as a return to their guitar-band roots. (What about "Walk On" and "Elevation," the epitome of the uplifting songs picked for "1990-2000"?) Maybe that's U2's mischievous rebelliousness peeking through serious passion. That would help explain the inclusion of "Miss Sarajevo," their collaboration with Luciano Pavarotti from the "Passengers: Original Soundtracks 1" fake film score album.

But judging from the flashy techno populating the bonus B-sides disc, U2 prefer to hammer home their defiant teenage outlaw side on this half of the collection. "Salome (Zooromancer Remix)" sounds vaguely like Duran Duran's "Save a Prayer" after an extended bit of chilly disco, while "Dirty Day (Junk Mix)" is an odd collage of sound with old pal Brian Eno on keyboards. "Even Better Than the Real Thing (Perfecto Mix)" and "Numb (Gimme Some More Dignity Mix)" are saturated with gospel choir vocals of early '90s house music, and "Discotheque (Hexidecimal Mix)" cribs a crash-and-burn synth echo from the Chemical Brothers' "Setting Sun." Only a few tracks -- in particular the hushed "North and South of the River" and "Your Blue Room" -- tone down the frenzy for more solemn reflection.

While not terribly groundbreaking in terms of danceable electronica, these songs nevertheless are a more honest representation of U2's music from the 1990s. The samples and big beats twist the band's comfortable sound in new directions. The songs aren't always successful, but hearing them now, warts and all, is a welcome diversion from the frustratingly simplified recasting of the band on the A-sides disc.

The main thing "1990-2000" reveals is that U2 seem trapped by the mythology of their own earnestness. This carefully selected A-side collection feels like the members of the band have resigned themselves to the fact that they are best when writing passionate, uplifting songs. With the exception of bonus disc innovations, even their attempts of rebellion -- "Miss Sarajevo's" arias and the glitzy keyboard explosions on "pop" -- feel sanitized, occurring within the constraints of their larger-than-life, iconic image so that the compilation will flow well.

This is interesting because the oddball deviations and experiments on the bonus disc are more valuable than the limited edition availability. It proves that U2's club kid and jaded hipster phases just led them right back to the end of the 1980s -- right back to the type of music that made them successful and famous in the first place. The problem is that now U2 is trying to rewrite that story. Because "1990-2000" is the band's version of themselves as they want to be remembered. Burn those yearbook photos, ignore the wraparound shades and toss out that giant citrus fruit, because the 1990s were simply a wrong turn down an otherwise straightforward path. No harm done, no integrity damaged, right?

Well, no. Unfortunately, "1990-2000" also shows that the earnest U2 of 2002 isn't the same earnest U2 of 1987. The two new songs on the collection, "Electrical Storm" and "The Hands That Built America" (from the upcoming Leonardo DiCaprio movie "Gangs of New York") buttress the point. Both are gorgeous: The William Orbit mix of "Storm" swells with choruses that climax in a crash of guitar and Bono's yearning falsetto, and "Hands" screams with cinematic schmaltz and sweeping strings. At the same time, the emotional content of both songs is abstract, tugging at the heartstrings with vague declarations like "Storm's" "Let's see colors that have never been/ Let's go to places no one else has seen." These songs are cookie-cutter U2: Start with guitar chime, cue grand choruses, now end with a big crescendo and universal revelation. Despite how moving they sound, they emerge somewhat hollow and empty.

Even more disheartening, they sound contrived and somewhat complacent, which was what U2's changes in the 1990s were supposed to prevent. The band members said they didn't want to become caricatures of themselves, spitting out the same echoey chords and 4/5 songs album after album. Striking those ironic poses had its price -- it stole the innocence and purity that made the earnestness of their early music so magical and true.

The forced solemnity found on "1990-2000" is a sort of conformity that's antithetical to what the band has always stood for, and negates the limitless freedom of sound that made U2 great in the first place. Pass me some Maybelline and crank up that Bauhaus; I feel like a couple of spins of "Pop" are in order.


http://www.salon.com/ent/music/review/2002/11/19/u2_best/index.html
 
namkcuR said:
Striking those ironic poses had its price -- it stole the innocence and purity that made the earnestness of their early music so magical and true.

The forced solemnity found on "1990-2000" is a sort of conformity that's antithetical to what the band has always stood for, and negates the limitless freedom of sound that made U2 great in the first place.

I like the whole thing, but especially this thought in particular.
 
Funny though that most fans on this board absolutely flamed the B-sides disc of the 90's Best of.
IMO the 80s Best of was basically a greatest hits selection, this time choices are much better on the A disc to make it a real Best of.

Of course, the reviewer forgot to mention U2 was more than happy to make 3 single versions back on Pop. Interestingly enough, the most popular songs - and I think most people here would agree best songs - on Pop are SATS, Please and Gone. Even more interestingly, what is the most loved and arguably best song on Zooropa? Stay. Seems like it's the fans that enjoy the "passionate songs".

And Walk on and Elevation weren't released because, um, they weren't singles in 2000?

The era also started the habit of instead releasing proper B-sides we get millions upon millions of versions of remixes. Wasn't that great?
 
Last edited:
Salon.com generally features some of the best journalism and criticism on the Internet. I really felt this article hit the target. It was written by someone who is obviously familiar with the band's music.

And because of its accuracy, it's sort of a sad article. True, U2 scaled many heights in the 90's, and created some brilliant songs, but in my opinion, the sound "of the chopping down of the Joshua Tree" diminished the band and its' legacy.

Well, they gambled, they experimented, they took off into the ether. At least they weren't sticks in the mud, endlessly recycling "New Years Day" or "With or Without You." They deserve credit for that.
 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

Ok.... 2 much Pinot Noir 2nite. :wink:
 
Great read! The Best of 1990-2000 is indeed a pathetic excuse for a collection but the B-sides disc is worse IMO. It's neither a good collection of B-sides nor a good collection of remixes.
 
It's a piece of shit. You could say U2 should be ashamed, but it's as they want it. It's what U2 are in this day and age. Revisionist history and all.

It's part of the problem with the setlists. U2 want to pretend that they didn't write and perform more than half of their back catalog and they are ashamed of it, of course the 90's stuff but I am also talking about stuff from October as well as others.

Unimaginative is what they have become. They can't even remember the brave and brilliant souls who may have made mistakes, but were also brilliant in the same arena. Now, they polish over the scars and pretend they didn't exist. As the article said, they are trying to rewrite their own history and they can't.
That is what I think they are doing musically. Trying to put it all right. Puzzling.
 
U2DMfan said:
As the article said, they are trying to rewrite their own history and they can't. That is what I think they are doing musically. Trying to put it all right.

versus:

"If we don't know what it is, then it must be art."

Discuss.
 
Last edited:
U2DMfan said:


It's part of the problem with the setlists. U2 want to pretend that they didn't write and perform more than half of their back catalog and they are ashamed of it, of course the 90's stuff but I am also talking about stuff from October as well as others.


I didn't know two albums counted as more than half of their catalog.
 
U2girl said:
Funny though that most fans on this board absolutely flamed the B-sides disc of the 90's Best of.
IMO the 80s Best of was basically a greatest hits selection, this time choices are much better on the A disc to make it a real Best of.

Of course, the reviewer forgot to mention U2 was more than happy to make 3 single versions back on Pop. Interestingly enough, the most popular songs - and I think most people here would agree best songs - on Pop are SATS, Please and Gone. Even more interestingly, what is the most loved and arguably best song on Zooropa? Stay. Seems like it's the fans that enjoy the "passionate songs".

And Walk on and Elevation weren't released because, um, they weren't singles in 2000?

The era also started the habit of instead releasing proper B-sides we get millions upon millions of versions of remixes. Wasn't that great?

One of the reasons I flamed the 90's B-side disc is that it missed a lot of the great b-sides that were released in the 90's, such as "Holy Joe" and many U2 covers! Maybe the cover songs couldn't be included because of copyright reasons - fair enough. But why shove remix after remix when this could have been a great opportunity to introduce the world to a few more OS1 tracks or songs left off the A-side disc?

However, I have to disagree with the author in that I really enjoy the remixed versions of the 90's songs on the A-side disc. Some only have subtle changes - like an extended ending to "Staring at the Sun". "Numb" is the most worked over song - but it's really just a re-emphasizing of the vocals and I feel this version works SO much more than the "Zooropa" version. In the new version, Edge at time is drowned out by the other vocal tracks, which in turn emphasizes the "numbness" he is experiencing. "Gone" shines because it captures the beauty of the original while gloriously showcasing the power of the live performance. It's become a better track. "Discotheque" basically is the same, sans the "boom-chas" - no big difference, IMO.

Still, if one is desperate to hear the album versions, then get the albums. What some view as a weakness, I view as a strength. Give me a reason to get this "Best Of" collection - I already own the albums. And U2 provided that reason with new mixes and new songs. But the heart of what U2 was all about in the 90's remains. We hear the sassiness and irony of "The Fly" and "Even Better Than..." We hear the power of "Gone" and the seduction of "Mysterious Ways". Even the most cursory listening of this 90's era collection of songs versus that on the 80's "Best Of" will cause any listener to wonder if this is the same band.
 
Yeah I would have put Holy Joe and Where Did It All Go Wrong on the bsides disc to just get rid of some of the stupid remixes. The Numb, Dirt Day and Even Better remixes..

Even though Where Did It All Go Wrong isn't that great of a b-side.
 
U2girl said:


I didn't know two albums counted as more than half of their catalog.

Your apologist act gets so old. I even mentioned October by name, and clearly said "others as well'. For your information, as you and others like to frame your arguments around 80's vs 90's bullshit, I wasn't refering just to the 90's. I was refering to revisionist history, which is what U2 is doing and has done. U2 have almost completely forsaken their early material, save for a few songs.

U2 have recorded over 150 songs probably closer to 200.
They are performing about 30 songs on tour.
You do the math.

Anyways, read what I write and it will tell you what I am trying to say. If you don't understand what I mean, I am happy to answer questions.
 
Last edited:
doctorwho said:

However, I have to disagree with the author in that I really enjoy the remixed versions of the 90's songs on the A-side disc. Some only have subtle changes - like an extended ending to "Staring at the Sun". "Numb" is the most worked over song - but it's really just a re-emphasizing of the vocals and I feel this version works SO much more than the "Zooropa" version. In the new version, Edge at time is drowned out by the other vocal tracks, which in turn emphasizes the "numbness" he is experiencing. "Gone" shines because it captures the beauty of the original while gloriously showcasing the power of the live performance. It's become a better track. "Discotheque" basically is the same, sans the "boom-chas" - no big difference, IMO.

I seriously have to question the quality of your hearing.

Staring at the Sun - Not just an extended outro, but more prominent percussion at the start, and the guitars have been softened, with an acoustic audible.

Numb - The least changed of the 4 edits, only some extra falsetto, a couple of new vocal tracks and some riffing in the second half. All terrible but it is basically put down over the original track.

Gone - Crapped up with a rubbish vocal, new guitar and keyboard. Less busy than the Pop version and more boring, its like a soulless version of the live performance.

Discotheque - Have you even listened to the New Mix? It is completely different, the first third of the song is just vocal and some quiet twinkling, the guitar is completely different with just the one harder edge riff and the layers of sound from the album version are gone. A good minute or so shorter, and the boom cha's are gone.

Really, I don't see how you came to your conclusions about the New Mixes Doctor Who. I would put it down to opinion but with regards to Discotheque I just don't see how you can argue the fact that it is close to a new song, compared with the album cut.
 
Last edited:
U2DMfan said:


Your apologist act gets so old. I even mentioned October by name, and clearly said "others as well'. For your information, as you and others like to frame your arguments around 80's vs 90's bullshit, I wasn't refering just to the 90's. I was refering to revisionist history, which is what U2 is doing and has done. U2 have almost completely forsaken their early material, save for a few songs.

U2 have recorded over 150 songs probably closer to 200.
They are performing about 30 songs on tour.
You do the math.

Anyways, read what I write and it will tell you what I am trying to say. If you don't understand what I mean, I am happy to answer questions.

Yeah, like your constant critisism doesn't.

Where did I say anyting about the "80s vs 90s bullshit"? I responded to the article and by "two albums" comment
I was referring to the bashing of Vertigo setlist, for your information - we got Boy, October, War, UF, JT, RaH, AB, Passengers, ATYCLB, Bomb material covered so far. With rumours of Stay, Gone, Discotheque and Mofo it also looks like more 90s material is on the way.

As for dropping their older catalog, thank the 90s tours.

Early material? 11 O clock, Out of control, Spanish eyes, Slow dancing, 40, Gloria, An cat dubh/Into the heart, Electric co, Ocean.
Seems to me it's the oldies that are getting back lately...
 
Last edited:
The fact that The Fly, Please and Lemon were excluded and that Gone (diiferent mix!?) and First Time were included is quite frustrating and bizzare.

That disc, while it claims to be the best of, is choc a bloc full of stuff that shouldnt be there.

Beautiful Day
Stuck In A Moment
- SHOULD BE ON 00-10

Discotheque
Numb
Gone
- These versions are not what made these songs the "best" from that period. In fact, these mixes were presumaly made post-2000

First Time
- ....and no Fly, Please and Lemon? Senseless

Electrical Storm
Hands That Built America
- Should have reworked a b side from the period and release it as a promo single (ala sweetest thing)
 
I remember reading before about someone's idea that Gone or some ultra-rock infused Until the End of the World, or a reworked She's Gonna Blow Your House Down would've been a great idea.

I don't believe Beautiful Day or Stuck should've been there, it just doesn't fit the theme of their 90s work, and that kind of "revisionist history" bothers me.
Lemon, Please, Last Night on Earth, and The Fly would replace the 2000s tracks, and maybe put The Ground Beneath her Feet on there, and Stateless as a b-side, and it would've been more of a showcase of a truly great era of work.
 
Back
Top Bottom