vaz02
Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS
Angels is fucking magical , one of the best vocals of u2's experimental age and lyrically its up there with their best work i think.
vaz02 said:Angels is fucking magical , one of the best vocals of u2's experimental age and lyrically its up there with their best work i think.
xaviMF22 said:angels>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>crumbs
jimjam said:Another great thread from theu2fly
vaz02 said:Angels is fucking magical , one of the best vocals of u2's experimental age and lyrically its up there with their best work i think.
u2thewho said:Elvis and Edge both begin witht he letter "E", so Elvis, must play guitar for U2, so Elvis=Bono.
MumblingBono said:Angels is crap - dull, standard-fare-U2 melody, shit lyrics, poor vocals.
Crumbs is a top-5 among the post-2000 set.
u2thewho said:Elvis and Edge both begin witht he letter "E", so Elvis, must play guitar for U2, so Elvis=Bono.
LemonMelon said:I don't see how Crumbs and Walk On are similar, and they're always being compared.
Actually, the "you" preceding "ate" is much lower.LemonMacPhisto said:
Crumbs is alright, the highlight is Bono's satanic octave drop for the "ATE all your friends" line
gherman said:I love how all of a sudden everyone LOVES IGWSHA while no body ever talks about it around here
LemonMacPhisto said:are both plagued by over-production?
jimjam said:Comparing Crumbs and IGWSHA is like comparing my kitchen table to a carton of milk: they are similair because neither of them is any good at tennis
jimjam said:Comparing Crumbs and IGWSHA is like comparing my kitchen table to a carton of milk: they are similair because neither of them is any good at tennis
jimjam said:Comparing Crumbs and IGWSHA is like comparing my kitchen table to a carton of milk: they are similair because neither of them is any good at tennis
LemonMacPhisto said:
your kitchen table must suck.
mine's named Nadal.
LemonMacPhisto said:
your kitchen table must suck.
mine's named Nadal.