KhanadaRhodes said:
this list is absolutely hilarious. i'm sorry, i'm a big U2 fan, but they have not been consistently the biggest band from 1987-2005. to even suggest that no one else dominated the music scene for even one year in the past 18 years is laughable.
also, the police did NOTHING in 1985. there was no new album, no tour, nothing. how on earth could they be the biggest band when sting was off with his first solo album and tour? i will give you the beatles dominating the mid to late 60s, but this list really just looks like you picked your top five bands and just stuck them up there.
Did you happen to read my notes about the list I posted?
"The biggest band in the world or biggest artist in the world is usually judged based on two factors, global album sales of the latest album released and the concert ticket sales of that artist or bands latest tour. In general who the biggest artist or band is for any year or group of years should be based on that criteria, meaning an artist or group would be eligible for the title in any given year, EVEN IF THEY DID NOT RELEASE AN ALBUM OR TOUR THAT YEAR, AS LONG AS THEY WERE STILL AN ACTIVE BAND."
If you were only to consider artist who tour or release an album for a given year for the title of biggest band, then you will often end up having bands that, did not sell nearly as much as the band that had the title the year before being named as the biggest band which is absurd unless of course the band from the year before is clearly not a band anymore.
In addition, if you were to do a list of the most popular bands at that particular time and you decided to exclude bands that did not tour or release an album that year, then a band that only sold 200,000 copies of an album and played clubs would be considered bigger than a Stadium filling band like U2 or the Police simply because they did not release and album or tour that year, which again is absurd. The people who made U2 or the Police a stadium filling band the year before did not all of a sudden disappear.
Another thing is that it would be impossible to compare artist or bands who release albums and tour in different years. The standard I use once again is the global album sales and concert ticket sales for the latest album and tour done by the band. This allows you to compare and determine who is on top regardless of what year it is and who actually released and album this year or the next.
As for the Police in 1985, there is not another band who in that year had a combination of album sales and concert ticket demand as good as what the Police had with their latest album and tour from 1983/1984. The band with the title does not lose it until they break up or another band comes along and outdoes the biggest bands latest album and concert ticket sales. Of course, if one does not consider the Police to be a band anymore at that point, I understand and I pointed that out in my post before.
Now on to U2. You claim they have NOT been consistently the most popular band worldwide since 1987 and claim that the to suggest such is "hilarious" and "laughable".
I have plenty of statistics and facts to back up my lists, but I'd like to know which years and what bands you place above U2 from 1987 to 2005?
I did not randomly make this list up from my 5 favorite bands. In fact, only two of the bands would be in my list of favorites. I went through records from Amusement Business on the concert industry as well as album sales data from RIAA, IFPI, CRIA and other organizations which certify album sales for the music industry in various countries and regions around the world. I stuck to a basic criteria which I explained above and used the facts from these sources to create the list.