** All Get On Your Boots VIDEO Discussion HERE ** (No DL Links Please!)

[AchtungDude]

Seems like the bass is a Epiphone Rivoli after all...

 

[stealthboy]

Yeah, the getty images watermark and this delay...chances are this video is a very well done fake. Which would suck. And if the chances are good that the fake is better than the real deal...they've got quite an issue on their hands.

A well done fake? Umm... that's a stretch. I think the getty watermark is intentional for the following reasons:

1) Seriously, how could you fail to notice it if you're working with these images putting this together?
2) At the 1:57 mark the lady in black moves under the getty watermark (so the watermark text was lifted and put back on the moving image).
3) Maybe it's all a poetic piece to show how everyone sees all the problems in the world through stock imagery fed by "the media". Maybe the backgrounds have a feeling of collections of stock photos for a reason.

 

[Headache in a Suitcase]

BTW - The "You don't know how beautiful you are" part is a shout out to ALL women everywhere.
Great message for a lot of girls and women who don't ever feel good enough/pretty enough.

i will say absolutely not... and i will add that if the point of that lyric was a fastball, not only did you just swing and miss, but hte bat flew out of your hand, went straight up in the air and came down and hit you in the head, knocking you unconscious.

 

[October1977]

How on earth can this be faked?!

yes, they faked the band performing a song that no one has ever seen performed before.

are you nuts?

Haa. Maybe I'm nuts, yes. It would have to be an inside job, obviously - the band performed in front of a blue screen which would allow anyone who has access to that video to put whatever they want behind it. OR, they just want to remove the watermark (probably more likely).

Better?

 

[Moser]

Yeh, this is not a fake. This takes a lot of money to make!

 

[gvox]

Ok well I don't think there's any chance that it's fake. The person would have to have access to all the raw footage of them performing the song for the real video...way too much proper stuff there.

What's most likely imo is that somehow (which is reallllly hard to fathom), someone missed the "Getty Images" watermark and it has to be removed for copyright reasons. Because unless that is a blatant statement, there is no reason to use a watermarked image in a professional video..

BTW...now that I've seen the video, I agree with Headache..the song is growing on me!

 

[U2democrat]

How could someone professional miss that when most of us spotted it in 1 non-HD viewing?


Oh well, I LOVE IT.

 

[subnet]

we are beta testers for the video

we found a bug, need to fix that watermark

you're welcome

 

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

So now we're arguing whether or not the video is real?

 

[gvox]

i will say absolutely not... And i will add that if the point of that lyric was a fastball, not only did you just swing and miss, but hte bat flew out of your hand, went straight up in the air and came down and hit you in the head, knocking you unconscious.

qft

 

[coemgen]

I can't believe the band is delaying the video! Did they forget to take the watermarks off?

 

[October1977]

Ok well I don't think there's any chance that it's fake. The person would have to have access to all the raw footage of them performing the song for the real video...way too much proper stuff there.

What's most likely imo is that somehow (which is reallllly hard to fathom), someone missed the "Getty Images" watermark and it has to be removed for copyright reasons. Because unless that is a blatant statement, there is no reason to use a watermarked image in a professional video..

BTW...now that I've seen the video, I agree with Headache..the song is growing on me!

Probably right. And if it was an inside deal...lawsuit, being fired or trusted in any other job. Not worth it....

 

[gvox]

3) Maybe it's all a poetic piece to show how everyone sees all the problems in the world through stock imagery fed by "the media". Maybe the backgrounds have a feeling of collections of stock photos for a reason.

Point well taken...good call perhaps..

 

[ntalwar]

Wow - great video. Tons of images to digest.

 

[gvox]

They're making us watch this over and over to catch everything! Arrrgh!

 

[coach]

It's not a fake, somebody jumped the gun and released this before band authorization. It's most likely a work in progress, hence the Getty watermarks, and there are some blind frames in between edits..single black frames. So it's not the final product. I'm guessing this is the video that was supposed to air after the one that was going to premiere today.

 

[chrissybaby]

Point well taken...good call perhaps..

Yeah, it has to be. There is no way they would still be looking for clearance hours before the supposed premiere, is there? There has to be another reason for the delay...

 

[Galeongirl]

So now we're arguing whether or not the video is real?

No. There's no argument there because it obviously is.

I do agree tho that it can be delayed because of the watermarks.

 

[purpleoscar]

The screw up makes sense why they delayed the video.

 

[chrissybaby]

The screw up makes sense why they delayed the video.

how can it be a screw up? we need to know where eastlink sourced this video from before we presume it's a screw up. If this was from weeks and weeks ago, okay they were looking for clearance. If it's a leak of what has been sent out to media outlets (likely) then they can't have missed a huge "GETTY"..

 

[adrball]

- video
- watermark
- Fake?

 

[quiv]

https://www.yous endit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=bVlCZFhtcWZsUi9IRGc9PQ

Thank you so much!

 

[gvox]

Is it just me or doesnt is seem there some mole in Spain who always leaks shit?

 

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

No. There's no argument there because it obviously is.

I do agree tho that it can be delayed because of the watermarks.

Yeah, was just wondering... I know the video is real but you never know with some fans.

 

[Headache in a Suitcase]

How could someone professional miss that when most of us spotted it in 1 non-HD viewing?

easy...

"great video chaps... you're going to take those watermarkings off, right?"

ohhhh yea yea yea that's just a temporary thing, a placeholder really... we'll replace that

"ok whew... that would be embarassing"

tell me about it... anyways let's go to happy hour!




i designed a 30 page brochure for my work one time, put my own cell phone number in at one point as a placeholder until i got the real phone number... completely forgot that i had done it, proof read the thing a million times, had a dozen other people proof read it, and never remembered... low and behold the brochure went out with my own cell phone number in it instead of the real one.

i only got two phone calls, which was a relief.

 

[gvox]

Don't backpedal April. You doubted.

 

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

Don't backpedal April. You doubted.

 

[Anji]

Is it just me or doesnt is seem there some mole in Spain who always leaks shit?

So they should! To make up for the fiasco earlier in the year

 

[LarryMullen's POPAngel]

i designed a 30 page brochure for my work one time, put my own cell phone number in at one point as a placeholder until i got the real phone number... completely forgot that i had done it, proof read the thing a million times, had a dozen other people proof read it, and never remembered... low and behold the brochure went out with my own cell phone number in it instead of the real one.

i only got two phone calls, which was a relief.

 

[gvox]

..and in the background, my kids are singing Paramore on RB2