2nd wits video vs. free as a bird video

[U2Man]

2 extremely similar videos.

which one wins?

2nd wits: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F_F4zroP-E

free as a bird: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWtaEwEhM1I

 

[Jeffo17]

I like the beatles one.. I much prefer moving pictures to still ones, also just like the video better too.

 

[xaviMF22]

free bird all the way bitches

 

[Catman]

C'mon... it seems the obvious choice, from a technical standpoint, would be WitS #2. HOWEVER, one must then factor in originality, and for that, I give the nod to Free as a Bird

 

[Lancemc]

Free as a Bird. The Beatles are simply unbeatable. What can I say.

 

[LMP]

It's a draw for me.

I love them both.

 

[Justin24]

Both have there own style. I like Free as a Bird alot. But the U2 one is not bad at all.

 

[BVS]

Was 'Free As A Bird'(video) done by the band?

 

[Utoo]

The awesome 3D effects of WITS-2 win me over.

 

[U2Man]

i noticed them. but the camera is moving more in the faab video.

 

[adrball]

WITS is too fast. It makes me feel dizzy.

 

[BGD75]

I like both of them BUT i would pick #2. As interesting as number 1 video is, I just find it .... overwhelming. Way too many things (people) happening, too fast.

 

[Tiger Edge]

The concept fits the Beatles song better as it looks like a bird flying through all the scenes.

Both are cool, even though I prefer WITS1 to WITS2.

 

[Zoots]

Free as a Bird. The Beatles are simply unbeatable. What can I say.