LMP
Blue Crack Supplier
Night, Pfan.
Like I said to El-Mel, as much as I hate how Screwy said it, I think great superhero stories are almost like pop mythology, you know? Superman's an interesting allegory for Christ and American ideology in the '20s. Batman's a study in duality and madness. It's cool to me how you can wrap adult themes in an entertainment form geared more towards children. Recently, it's taken a more mature slant, but still, an interesting concept and execution and those two characters exemplify that.
I mean, it would be wrong to reject all of the new stuff because you don't like it, you'd be depriving your kids of their own childhood by supplanting your own. Nudging them in your direction would be alright though, you know?
I find it a bit of a stretch to place superhero stories on the level of ancient mythology that permeated socio-religious frameworks, like all the famous Greek stories and the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Old Testament and what-have-you, but I see where you're coming from. And I see how that appeals, even if the simple superheroness makes it a bit too ridiculous and unbelievable for my personal tastes. I do have to wonder how many people are actually conscious of all the thematic layering though, and how many are just "yeah Batman!"
Dr. Seuss, where the fuck did you get your doctor's degree?
Oh yeah; after all, Thomas was brand new when I got into it. And nobody wants to be stuck in the early nineties. But I've always been grateful that my own parents went to some effort to expose me to the great stuff they had enjoyed too - and I don't just mean children's programming here, but music and books and games and all that. I think that sort of thing really gives childhood more depth and diversity.
I saying older people like it because it is a modern mythology. Spider-man and Batman are our modern day Hercules and Achilles. These are stories we will pass down. You should respect that people of all ages care about those characters and stories.
So The Age of Innocence was a damn good movie. Can't say I liked it enough to see it again, but it was incredibly well-made and performed.
Really? I've only seen the first scene in my film aesthetics class, I've been meaning to rent it.
Yep. It's interesting to see Scorsese's style adapted to fit this time period, but it fits like a glove. Thematically, it's the same - a guy wracked with guilt over a decision he has to make, and ultimately has his redemption. The difference here is that all of that violence and angst is internal, and it's Daniel Day-Lewis, so there's that. It's a cool companion piece to Gangs of New York, too: both take place in New York in the 1800s and have D-Day, but while this one focuses on upper-crust society, Gangs is the polar opposite.
I recommend it, but it's a frustrating watch, even if that's intentional.
So, I'm listening to some REM and Shiny Happy People came on. I know it's meant to be some terrible sin to enjoy the song, but fuck it, I do anyway.
It's on the cd at work right now, and I annoy all those around me everytime it comes on, because i do so love that song
That was the naughtiest Gingerbread Man I ever tasted
So, I'm listening to some REM and Shiny Happy People came on. I know it's meant to be some terrible sin to enjoy the song, but fuck it, I do anyway.
If I'm in the right mood, I LOVE the song Shiny Happy People.
It would not make a list of my top 50 R.E.M. songs but, yeah, I enjoy it.